>>508111615I’ll spell this out for you since you seem to be having trouble with it: Israel (and the US by extension when acting on its behalf) has never acted in good faith when they invite anyone in the region to the negotiating table. Iran got preemptively attacked after they accepted and were waiting for the scheduled meeting. Now they’re invited again, and Iran should be entitled to proof that Israel isn’t just using it as an excuse to stop the rockets for a few days and reload their own launchers. One such piece of proof is that Israel is abiding by the same agreements that Iran was expected to be held to
Does this make sense or should I bust out the crayons to draw a picture?