>>508112900 asbestos wasn't even banned completely in the US some of it isn't even bad are you just dumb nigger or something who gets all your info CNN
>>508112900 >people if you consider the orange taco nigger to be human KEK https://www.newsweek.com/trump-rolling-back-asbestos-ban-sparks-warning-lives-risk-2088221
AnonymousID: KD/bmKAz
6/20/2025, 8:21:26 PM No.508113310
>>508113144 The rise of plywood townhomes directly correlates to the drop in asbestos usage
>>508113370 Those (((people))) could very well just be glowies attempting to muddy the waters of our ideas. Keep that idea in mind whenever reading threads.
>>508113310 I don't care, nigger. I walk barefoot and drink raw milk.
AnonymousID: uf7ACilo
6/20/2025, 8:26:08 PM No.508113702
Why didn't they ban this kind of asbestos until 2024 if it's so bad?
AnonymousID: D8URhE2l
6/20/2025, 8:26:45 PM No.508113760
>>508112662 (OP) covid forced normies online around the same time that cheap chinese smart phones let third worlders flood the internet, neither of these populations have the mental discipline or presence of mind to handle being exposed to a torrent of horseshit
AnonymousID: Adck2XZr
6/20/2025, 8:27:48 PM No.508113845
>>508113144 Okay then buy some asbestos and breathe it in document your daily inhalation of asbestos particles and I will believe you in ten years if you donโt get mesothelioma
>>508114066 But my dna chart says 50% Irish and the rest is Scott and wales. Wdym? I donโt have a single relative from Mexico and I was born in the United States after my grandparents migrated from Ireland to alaska and my fathers side was military from Texas.
>>508112662 (OP) I'm going to be honest, a lot of those "FUTURE!!!!" concept art pieces look really fucking dystopian. There should be a better way to visualize prosperity.
AnonymousID: Je8wtr1Z
6/20/2025, 8:36:18 PM No.508114556
>>508112900 Yeah the USA never fully banned it. Theres long been a lot of business interests pushing for the restrictions to be removed. Russia didn't ban it either. But they argue its safe if you don't allow it to fragment and their limited legislation reflects that.
AnonymousID: Xq8fAJeR
6/20/2025, 8:37:23 PM No.508114661
>>508114039 Are palisades unhealthy for you? They don't hurt you unless you fall onto them. According to your retard logic they objectively are unhealthy for you.
AnonymousID: 3s5O0Gmr
6/20/2025, 8:40:04 PM No.508114880
>>508112662 (OP) You really wanted to live in that bowl of spaghetti dystopian hellhole? I guess that's what you are imagining "progress" to look like I guess. Man has to go back to the land eventually.
AnonymousID: wHknWyPh
6/20/2025, 8:40:54 PM No.508114939
>>508112900 Miggers are now saying asbestos is fine because trump wants to legalize it or some shit
>>508112662 (OP) Besides the health issues isn't asbestos by far the beat insulator and fire proof building material we have?
AnonymousID: uf7ACilo
6/20/2025, 8:43:31 PM No.508115157
Still waiting for an answer to my question. Six threads so far and nobody can explain why this asbestos wasn't banned before last year if it's so dangerous.
I liked what my dad said. The future is either going to be super cool and advanced like some star trek film. Or a apocalypse. There's no in-between. Either we humans figure it out and things become cool and advanced. Or we don't and things start to fall apart.
AnonymousID: wHknWyPh
6/20/2025, 9:03:40 PM No.508116909
>>508115157 Are you retarded? There is tons of toxic shit that dont get banned literally hundreds of manmade chemicals that you are in contact with everyday that destroy your testicles and cause cancer. If youre lucky it only takes 50 years from finding out a chemicals inherent toxicity until the government bans it
>>508116909 >There is tons of toxic shit that dont get banned literally hundreds of manmade chemicals that you are in contact with everyday that destroy your testicles and cause cancer. So one more won't make much of a difference? Glad we agree.