Kek

>>508117723 (OP)
good.
Hes often foolish but mainly hes sincere and has an "American citizens first" agenda
very respectable

>>508117951
His love for his country is genuine

It's because most of the GOP—apart from a tiny ~ dozen or so 'Freedom Coalition' of hard maga—in United States Congress are RINO lying corrupt grifters that will say and do anything depending on the day's weather to advance the uniparty corporatist-Zionist agenda.

>>508117723 (OP)
if us elections werent gay he could run and win

>>508117951
>>508118084
both true

>>508117723 (OP)
Holy shit. Him going against israel is just unreal. He maybe a spook but holy shit that was bad ass.

>>508118104
Tucker doesn't want to be in elected office.
He's discussed and mentioned this extensively, also he wouldn't be suited in that type of role by his own admission.

>>508117951
Fippy bippy.

>>508118204
he's also a cia asset as confirmed by putin on vision

>>508118398

A fundamental problem with democracy is that people will vote for who they like, they will like people they have been exposed to, and they will be exposed to people who are in the business of exposing themselves and not necessarily to people who are competent to hold office.

>>508118204
>Tucker doesn't want to be in elected office.
>He's discussed and mentioned this extensively
complete opposite

>>508117723 (OP)
He finally exposed Fox and Axel Springer as wanting to do the bidding of the Likudniks. Good on him. Remember when the twin towers were blown up by mostly Saudi nationals and we invaded Iraq that had virtually zero Al Qaeda presence? It was all down to those cucked AIPAC assets in the media and Congress selling us the need for "pre-emptive" occupation and remodeling of the Middle East

>>508118513
>exposed
In modern industrialized / west nations the corporate mass media controls any exposure.
'Competence' is easily able to be concealed and faked by corporate mass media as evidenced by the 2021-2024 Biden administration (that was purportedly "voted in" to office Nov 2020 based on their supporting electorate satisfied that Joe Biden was "competent")

Has nothing to do with persona or 'competence' of the candidate itself.

>>508118504
this a picture of oyu? idgi

>>508117723 (OP)
says more about the low IQ of Repubicans than it does about Tucker.

https://genius.com/General-wesley-clark-seven-countries-in-five-years-annotated

>So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” -- meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office -- “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”

>>508118620
>Germany flag Two Posts By This ID
Wrong.
Tucker does not want to be in politics itself, he viscerally despises it.
He has discussed this at length, for many years, in his speaking events and interviews with his guests.
As already explained, he also does not think he would be suitable in a government role. (At best he could and perhaps ? would serve in an administration as some sort of advisor or speechwriter)
Tucker does not, ever, plan to run for elected office.

>>508117951
He can also admit that he was wrong about the Iraq War. He's also not sycophantically loyal to Trump.

>>508117723 (OP)
Political run when?

>>508118888
wasted digits shillbot Poland flaggot 3 pbtid

>>508117723 (OP)
TUCKER 2028

>>508117723 (OP)
>Over 60+% of Republicans trust Tucker Carlson over any elected Republican!

Which is why (((they))) may try to get him to run for president. (((They))) could use another actor president, like Reagan.

>>508119105
>when
Never.

>>508119046
>Axel Springer
lol im a moron. I thought your original post was saying the opposite

>>508117723 (OP)
Shit before miga kikes took over /pol/ a lot of anons wanted Tucker to run for president

for now.

>>508117951
>>508118084
>Press X to Doubt
Never trust a media talking head. If they wanted him silenced, he would be. He's a useful tool, so they are letting him have just enough rope to hang himself.

>>508117723 (OP)
Based if true.

>>508118098
Or are Bush Republicans.

>>508118204
>wouldn’t be suited
But Trump, AOC, etc are?

>>508117723 (OP)
Tucker would make for a good first Emperor of the United States

>>508118204
He'd make a good sec of state or VP. Trump needs someone in his ear who's not a ziocon war monger

>>508119140
TUCKER MASSIE 2028. Dare the jews to kill both of them.

Massie and Ron Paul are the two politicians I trust. Rand Paul cucked out during the 2015 Republican primary debates and I will never forgive or forget that. I appreciate all the covid shit he has done and continues to do. I just know he's not strong enough to stand by his principles if he were ever president.

As far as Tucker goes, I don't trust him. I agree with most of the stuff I hear him say. I admire him for admitting he was wrong about Iraq. But I saw one debate he had with some retard (I think it was Piers Morgan). Even though I largely sided with Tucker during most of the debate, he was getting destroyed by a retard. Tucker could not defend his points.

>>508119278
ok Hans.
I agree with your fp that Tucker, sometimes, makes foolish remarks.

>>508119480
>sec state or vp
Nah he wouldn't like it. He could be someone in Trump's ear, but remember that—in somewhat of a parallel way to Trump—Tucker has his own audience. I simply think that TC will continue doing the type of journalism and interviews he has been doing since covid, independent of the corporate mass media Zioblob.
Maybe ?? he, and a few others (Glenn Greenwald? idk) team up to create a real alternative news network to the establishment swamp MSNBC/Fox

>>508119465
>hurr durr
Tucker himself—who also has never run for elected office—specifically says out of his own mouth that he would not be 'suited' or appropriate for elected office.
Did AOC or Trump ever say those words about themselves?
Tucker also despises >>508119046
politics, esp. D.C. swamp politics overall

daily reminder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_nFI2Zb7qE
cucker is a millionaire funded by billionaires