Greetings!
As the conflicting interests in this world grow more and more complex and intertwined, the perspective of finding sustainable solutions seems to become more and more impossible. Some of the environments in which discernment and judgment on key global policies are formed and justified are known to me in some detail. I have decided to use my knowledge and anecdotal experience (as subjective and limited as it may be) to bear witness and to provide as much of a one-to-one map of these conflicting realities.
You can ask me any questions you would like, except for those that I might deem too personal.
For starters, I consider the conflict between the Israel and Iran entities to be the most crucial and important conflict in our lifetime. In order to truly understand the nature of this conflict, one must look at the epicentre of modern history, which is the late 1970s.
Between 1976 and 1979, a split occured between two environments that are in a profoundly naive way believed to be effectively identical by many political observers. This split however is deeply ingrained in the political coordinate system of the 21st century.
Environment 1: "Technocratic Neo-Feudalism" (a continuation of the Rhodesian British ImperialTradition): Institutions: CFR, Trilateral Commission, UN, European Union, Pilgrim's Society, American Security Council, Le Cercle-Pinay, Bilderberg Group. Prominent proponents: David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Arthur Schlesinger, Alvin Toeffler, Zbigniew Brzezinski. It operates under the framework of a misanthropic realism as an"ideology of no ideology". It operates under a geostratecic zionism as a means of maintaining hegemony over the eurasian land bridge. Manifestos: "The Crisis of Democracy" (1975), "The Alchemy of Finance" (1987), "The End of History" (1992).
Environment 2: Identitarian Zionism
Ideology: Rejection of liberal enlightenment and "globalism". Straussian mysticism/symbolism and jewish eschatology.
(Part 1)
>>508122768 (OP)The first crack of major importance between these two environments became visible during the Yom Kippur-War in 1973, where not only many jews in the US considered the diplomatic response by US (represented by Kissinger) to have been too weak and leniant towards soviet interests. Those in the know understood the connection between the Oil Crisis and the establishment of the Petrodollar system that succeeded Americas decoupling from the gold standard. Much has been written about these rather complex causal relationships, so I will not go into too much detail.
What led (at a base level) many jews across the world which were known to be harbingers of liberal or even communist "cosmopolitanism" to a shift into the interventionist right, served for the more "active" and "elitarian" elements as a means to change the geostrategy of Israel into what became known as the "Yinon" plan: The destruction of the hostile Baathist regimes of Syria, Libya, Iraq and finally Iran and the ethno-religious fragmentation of the entire Middle East.
>>508124280Iran at that time was (in its monarchical form) indeed less of a threat to Israel as it is now, and there are multiple reasons for that which I cannot go into at the moment. This scenario mustn't be confused with the "Clean Break Scenario" of the 1990s, in which Iran directly appeared as the upcoming final hindrance to regional domination by Israel.
For the first time during these years, the First Environment became branded or designated as hostile to the well-being of Israel and its long-term ambitions by this new forming Israeli right wing.
During the presidency of Ronald Reagan, much of this conflict was being swept under the rug because of a formal agreement, with both sides sneakily bringing their own influence to the table in a never-ending power struggle. The First Environment accepted the influence of the Second Environment because many jews that operated under it bore the same identitarian connection to Israel, others justified the growing influence of the Second Environment by the geopolitical use of Israel as an asset in the Middle East. The creation of Hesbollah and Hamas on the other hand has its sources in the Second Environment as a means towards the "ethno-religious" fragmentation as laid out in the Yinon strategy. After George H. Bush, who had served as kind of a mediator between these two environments, was not reelected in 1992 and many agreements and concessions were made under Clinton to the palestinian cause (the promulgation of Yasser Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin as the "peacemakers" was one of those scenarios) the response was a direct breakthrough and infiltration of the US in 2001.
bump
finally someone who knows what they're talking about, instead of being content shitflinging twitter-sized insults all over the place.
how we got here is trivial
if you cant predict the future what use are you?
OP I know we are living in crazy historical times. But how high do you think bitcoin will go i read bretton woods 3 by zoltan poszar
>>508122768 (OP)>>508122768 (OP)>I have decided to use my knowledge and anecdotal experienceWho the fuck are you? Why should we be interested in your opinion?
>>508122768 (OP)you sound like a faggot and your shits all fucked up.
Also I didn't bother to read any of that.
>>508126079In 2001, through George W. Bush, the Second Environment, or even its most consequential, extremist part, had, for the first time ever, direct control over all US american resources and used them in its global "War On Terror" against the enemies of (Greater) Israel. On an ideological/meta-political level, the idea of universal liberalism first had to articulate itself in a radical defense (instead of an offense, as it was historically used to) as an answer to pre-modern realities such as islamic terrorism. This led to the precarious situation (which was explained in detail by Peter Thiel in his essay "The Straussian Moment") that the enlightened West had to defend itself via totalitarian pre-modern means which leads to an inward contradiction that cannot be resolved and must therefore remain a secret.
The First Environment, which had used universal liberalism as a means to reproduce itself within the intellectual, political and scientific elite, could not answer the threat that this new environment posed in an effective manner; the only medium-effective response it could produce was the controlled demolition of the economy in 2008 and the "Coronavirus" situation in 2020 and its chief ideological expression in the "Great Reset" or "Fourth Industrial Revolution" paradigm that became common knowledge after 2020.
>>508122768 (OP)>>508124280>>508126079>>508127206Quick question, Mr 300 IQ
Pardon my French but why would anyone give a fuck about some proxy conflict that won't lead to anything other than Media PR?
>>508127206In the meantime, the "Arab Spring" created a shift in the Middle East, where only Syria and Iran remained as serious (state-actor) enemies to Israels regional hegemony. On the other hand, the First Environment, which always gave Eurasian affairs precedence over Israeli affairs, regarded the Syrian question as inextricably linked to the Ukrainian question, as they hoped that the russian intervention in Syria would weaken their aggressive response to the attempted US/CIA takeover of Ukraine in 2013.
Thus, making the conflict bilateral (with Syria and Ukraine as the nodes of russian and US collision) served as a way to strategically weaken Russia.
>>508126797>>508126999Don't bother.
>>508127834It is not only Media PR that has been involved, but, as I have made clear, real foreign policy interests, mainly of Israel.
This very quick rundown served to show the basic structure of this existing conflict which sits very deep in the elite.
It is, one could say, a direct continuation of the Zionist/Bolshevist dialectic of the early 20th century, where many cosmopolitan/communist jews stood in opposition to the Zionist idea out of fear of estrangement from gentile societies and possible persecution.
I want to move on, however, to say a few words about the developments since 2020 in the light of what I have just outlined.
The scenario of the "Coronavirus" served symbolically as the "poisoned crown" of globalism. What this means is that the same way that globalism once "spread" like a virus via the supply chains, it is now being "revoked" in the same manner; in an esoteric code, globalism is being "crowned" with a poisoned crown.
