After a year of research (applied autism) I finally cracked the code!

Juilus Caesar's real identity was Ptolemy XI Alexander II, Cleopatra's uncle-husband. He also used the regional aliases of Asander, King of Bosphorus. Cleopatra took on the Bosphoran identity of Dynamis, queen of Bosphorus.

In the name Asander (his Bosphoran alias), “Asa” means “lord” in Thracian and Celtic, and “andros” means “man” or “son of man” in Greek. Jesus is referred to as “the son of man” 81 times in the four canonical gospels. Asandros can also be interpreted as “son of the lord” or “son of Asa, the lord”. The Thracian version of Zeus was Asa, the Celtic was Esus/Hesus (Esus becomes Aesus pronunced ah-soos. There was no J in ancient Latin so Jesus was pronunced ah-soos was well). The Etruscan word “Aesar” (also spelled “Aeser” or “Aisar”), where Asa could also derive from, means “god” or “divine”. Asandros can also translate to either “son of god”, or “son of Lord Aesar”. The Greek language often added the prefix “K” to words borrowed from other languages, so Aesar (“god”) -> Greek Kaesar -> Latin Caesar. He was the first "Jesus" and then his descendants took that title as an avatar.

Mark Antony's real identity was either Ptolemy of Cyprus, a brother of Ptolemy XII Auletes (Cleopatra’s father) aka Mithridates Chrestus aka king Herod or else he was Cleopatra's father Ptolemy XII Auletes/Ptolemy X Alexander I, king of Egypt (she was also married to two of her brothers. This is how incestuous this family was).

Rome in Italy was built in the Middle Ages, at the same time as the rest of Europe. The Egyptian Ptolemaic empire didn't die at the founding of Rome, Ptolemaic Kings just moved to the Bosphorus and then took on regional aliases. They eventually moved to Italy.

Read more here:

https://hereticalbooks.com/the-origins-of-christianity/

This is some absolutely abhorrent historical "research" with no references or bibliography or body of research to support it.

>>508140159
>https://hereticalbooks.com/the-origins-of-christianity/
This is not a "body of research"

>>508139950 (OP)
funny coincidence i have a youtube video in my queue that explains the theory that Jesus was Titus.

>>508139950 (OP)
Lol.

~ May IHVH and his Son, Jesus Christ, bless all of you here on 4chan. Amen. ~

~ Let's all love Lain! ~

>>508140201

As a historian I am admittingly in uncharted territory and I have discovered things that no other historian has, but there are a few historians who have come to the same conclusions as me in one way or another: Anatoly Fomenko, Charles N. Pope, Laurent Guyenot/The First Millennium Revisionist

https://www.unz.com/author/laurent-guyenot/
https://www.unz.com/author/first-millennium-revisionist/

>>508139950 (OP)
the ptolemaic family tree is something truly fascinating

>>508139950 (OP)

die you child raping jew

>>508140159

jew

>>508140201

OP is a kike and he spams this board 24/7. hopefully iran will bomb his house soon.

>>508140787

Start with this book by Charles N. Pope:

https://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Among-Julio-Claudians-Charles-Pope/dp/B08XL7Z118

Then this one. It proves that Philo of Alexandria was a woman/grandson of King Herod:

https://www.amazon.com/Following-Philo-Paul-Fathers-Christianity/dp/1798635593

Then Ralph Ellis: Jesus: the Last of the Pharaohs:

https://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Last-Pharaohs-Ralph-Ellis/dp/0932813119

Then finish up with Anatoly Fomenko and Laurent Guyenot/The First Millennium Revisionist

It makes sense when you realize the Greco-Ptolemic elite used aliases to control their empire.

I am de-facto the first personto identify Asander of Bosporus as Julius Caesar's regional aliases, and Tiberius Julius Saurmates II as his grandson! Anyone reposting my theories better give me credit for this!

>>508140787
Your claims contend that one of the most well documented figures of western history and an entire Empire that arose from his actions are somehow displaced in time by over 1000 years. This isn't something you can balance on some sub-referential hypotheses from a handful of sources that were never even really taken into serious consideration for debate.
The Eastern Roman Empire has a lot of Ptolemaic and Selucid ties due to the regional governance of Macedonia and strong dependence on legal claims to lands established under the Diadochi of Alexander, it was considered the highest legal claim to be able to claim ancestry and legal rights reaching back to the Diadochi Wars or before....and for a place as corrupt as the Byzantine Empire became....these claims were regularly fabricated and pressed under dubious circumstance on the regular to justify and validate all manner of ridiculous inter-empire squabbles and to even elevate entirely unqualified people to the Imperial throne at times.
You're not finding something no one has ever seen before, you're peering back into an era dominated by liars obsessed with legal claims that would fabricate them on a dime to make something work for the era/time they were in.
There are inordinate amounts of bloodline claim to the Diadochi and even to the Julian line that come out of that part of the world and almost all of them are falsified.

>>508142007

We don't know anything about history before Renaissance (even from that point onwards is iffy because all history was filtered through the Vatican).

Josphus Justus Scalinger is the Jesuit who "discovered" 80% of the history books we use today (usually on demand).

Look up another Jesuit named Jean Hardouin, he was the librarian for the king of France. He said that a 14th Century conspiracy forged practically all literature traditionally believed to have been written before that era. His book is called Prolegomena.

>>508142643

Laurent Guyenot/The First Millennium Revisionist addresses this:

https://www.unz.com/author/laurent-guyenot/
https://www.unz.com/author/first-millennium-revisionist/

>>508139950 (OP)
or, Jesus was who the emperors were pretending to be for centures. dipshit. just like what 'baal' means.. you are confusing names and titles.

>>508142694

Specifically these articles:

https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-roman-antiquity/
https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-church-history/
https://www.unz.com/article/how-long-was-the-first-millenium/
https://www.unz.com/article/twin-events-and-phantom-centuries-in-late-antiquity/
https://www.unz.com/article/the-constantine-hoax-and-the-forgery-of-western-history/

Then move on to Anatoly Fomenko.

>>508142643
>We don't know anything about history before Renaissance
We absolutely do. The history of the Roman Empire is extensively documented through so many sources that its very timeline is beyond debate. You cannot tell me that "The Vatican" has fabricated over 100 different accepted historical sources that were concurrent or near to current in that time simply to make up some kind of bullshit to obscure the fact that Gaius Julius was somehow the Son of God....that would be ridiculous. Why would they assign that to a Syrian carpenter when they could literally claim blood rights from GOD HIMSELF by validating Gaius Julius as the literal Son of God?
There is no logic to the "the Vatican" hiding this at all. It would give them effective religious cause to claim dominion over the entire Christian world....which to be fair they mostly had in the Middle Ages anyways, and never had to make such a claim.
The Pope wouldn't have needed Charlemagne if the Vatican could claim legal appointment or descent from the Son of God, the office of Pontifex Maximus was the literal office Caesar held prior to the beginnings of the war against the Senate....there is simply no way the Catholic Church would "hide" their direct mandate from the Son of God himself if they had it.

>>508143280

Everything we know about ancient Rome comes from two sources: Herodotus (aka The Father of Lies), and the other half from Cassius Dio.

Tacitus was proven to be middle ages forgery. See Laurent Guyenot above.

EVERYTHING we know of history was filtered through the Jesuits.

Any Julius Caesar was deified in two religions: The Flammen Dialis Cult, and Cult of Divine Julius after his death. He was the "Pontix Maximus"in these religions.

Somebody has already written a bvvook about this. Julius was also the same person as Adolf Hitler. All great leaders are

>>508143669
>Tacitus was proven
By who? You're obviously pulling information from completely unvalidated sources and there are lot more Roman historians than just Herodotus and Dio....Caesar himself was one of them. Much of what we know of his life comes from his very own writings, he was a shamless self promoter and used his literacy as a way to establish his historical image even before he became a historical figure...this is well known and well established in all historical circles.
You mention Herodotus without even mentioning Livy or Sallust, Cicero himself is a well established historical source and has many accepted and validated pieces of writing on issues of the time. Plutarch and Quintilian and those are just CONTEMPORARY historians and doesn't even go into the raft of post Caesarian era historians that wrote about the rise of the Empire. And it completely ignores Hellenistic sources and Egyptian contemporary sources as well.

I'm sorry but you're having to play a really complicated game of twister here to even make this work and all you're doing is continually referencing the same invalid materials.