https://subspecieist.com/archaic-hominins/africans-ape-like-genetics/
https://subspecieist.com/subspecieist-definitive-guide/
https://www.sci.news/genetics/west-africans-dna-archaic-hominin-08123.html

>>508154526 (OP)
>Keep seeing this
>Don't have the ape jaw

>>508154526 (OP)

>>508154738

>>508154526 (OP)
some kinda ape, probably.
mixed levels: niggers > east asians > hWites
we're the purest humanoids, making the rest LITERALLY subhuman

>>508154710
Prognathism it's called and yes they do

>>508154831

>>508154917
I work a facility packed with Subsaharans, some do, but i've seen plenty that don't

>>508155046
so u sayin niggers are animals

>>508154738
>be soviet mad scientist
>mix human and chimp DNA
>make niggers
????

>>508154526 (OP)
>i know a seeeekrit!!!
>but i'm not telling!!! tee hee!
Faggots.

Fucking faggots and their coy pussyfooting around. Just fucking say what kind of ape it is.

>>508154526 (OP)
They still look like this

No shit.

Humans evolved from monkeys and started out white, not black. Black humans were a side split and turned into modern africans. The true humans are the ones who built the pyramids and colosseum

>>508154831
Most likely a surviving later version of Homo Erectus.

>>508154526 (OP)
literally the biblical demons, Djinns.

>>508155903
It’s pretty much proof they don’t know it, kids do it all the time

>>508154526 (OP)
The worst thing about this is that they were human once. Into Africa theory is the truth and it gets worse. In the fossil record you can see the humans that traveled there once had large brains but something happened and these creatures are the end result.

>>508156220
The missing link

>>508156416

Go ahead and try to prove that blacks are a different species than whites. To conclusively prove it you'd have to be able to demonstrate that whites and blacks can't interbreed to produce fertile offspring, that might be a big ask though.

>>508154526 (OP)
A retarded chimp

The DNA was close enough for niggers

>>508156220

>>508154526 (OP)
The secret is homo habilis.

>>508156733

When, long ago, the Gods created Earth,
In Jove's fair image Man was shap'd at birth.
The beasts for lesser parts were next design'd;
Yet were they too remote from humankind.
To fill this gap, and join the rest to man,
Th'Olympian host conceiv'd a clever plan.
A beast they wrought, in semi-human figure,
Fill'd it with vice, and call'd the thing a NIGGER.

Some shitty monkey obviously

>>508156942
he do be erect knowatimsayin

>>508157034
>pick up the soap

>>508156714
The genetic distance between Caucasians and sub-Saharan Africans can be as large as 0.2%, yet they can interbreed with fertile offspring. The genetic distance between Homo sapiens sapiens and Neanderthals is less, (<0.08%), so they could very likely interbreed as well.

Many people believe that if two animals cannot interbreed they are different species and, conversely, if they can interbreed they are the same species. If two animals cannot interbreed they are always classified as different species. But if two animals can interbreed, they may or may not be classified as different species. There are many examples where taxonomists have classified two animals as different species even though they can and do interbreed. Even most dictionaries will not define “species” as populations that are incapable of interbreeding. Indeed, one dictionary specifically states, “… related organisms or populations potentially capable of interbreeding … “ Many “species” can interbreed, but typically do not. For example, many species of birds, such as the pintail (Anas acuta) and the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), can interbreed. The wolf (Canis lupus) and the dog (Canis lupus familiaris), the coyote (Canis latrans), and the common jackal (Canis aureus) have different species names (lupus, latrans, and aureus), yet they can all interbreed and produce fertile progeny. Even the two species of orangutan (Pongo abellii from Sumatra and Pongo pygmaeus from Borneo) can interbreed, despite having different chromosome numbers, 5 and so can the two species of chimpanzee, the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo chimpanzee (Pan paniscus). So the fact that all human races can interbreed to produce fertile progeny does not mean that they should be classified as a single species.

>>508156714
that hasn't been the definition of species for 50 years because more and more exceptions kept popping up

>>508154526 (OP)
It's called a chimp-out for a reason.

>>508154526 (OP)
>ghost hominid
Is not an actual ghost, it's just a hominid that's unidentified. The pop science jive threw you off because you're gullible
>Subsaharan Africans
It's just West Africans though. You're being very Jewish

Homo Sapiens have been around for 300,000 years. How many earth changing events happened during that time and humans had to start over from scratch. I understand how a car works but I can't mine the minerals to build one.

>>508154917
They also tend to have hyperdontia, born with too many teeth
>>508156714
Biologists claim distinct species for animals that breed in captivity but not in nature. In nature, whites and blacks do not interbreed because they are separated by geography, customs, and pheromones. But we're living in the zog zoo, and the natural order is forced to take a back seat.

>>508157414
Thanks einstein, refer to this post:
>>508154831

Here's an article on this subject. It appears to be a small brained pygmy population.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/the-ghosts-of-africa/

>>508157617
Steve Sailer is Jewish controlled opposition.

>>508156093
>>508156416
Man originated from the region where the Mediterranean Sea is now, and modern Europeans are the direct continuation.

Everyone else is some kind of simian-sapien hybrid, but I guess Asian chicks and Latinas are a special kind of White man's sex monkey.
Modern Africans are some kind of devolved ape that ate whatever the missing link (or links) was.

>>508154526 (OP)
I think the ghost hominid is a nigger.
If all the other DNA makes Caucasians, Jews and Chinese people, then the niggerness must be the ghost hominid. Even though Jews are the niggers of civilisation, ghost hominid is the nigger of niggers.

>>508156714

You can breed many different species. Some offspring are sterile, or one resulting gender usualy, but not always sterile, but if you keep breeding the fertile ones eventualy they are mostly fertile and can breed back into the species they started from. Then everyone is a hybrid that mostly resembles the same species.
Scientists have said humans are the same type of thing a combination of various things not just some linear evolution.

If africans started breeding with a homo erectus or chimp like ancestor they would have regressed backwards. And people breeding with the result would also be a regression.
Africa has some populations that even with education and a nutritional diet top out around 50 iq average. That is dumber than many trained animals.

>>508157617
From 2019 unfortunately, need something from March 2025 or after

“We do know that African populations derive some small fraction of their DNA, possibly as much as 5%… from archaic lineages that we haven’t discovered… there is some sign of some archaic lineage that’s contributed to some populations. What we don’t know is the identity of that lineage… It could be Naledi?”– Dr. John Hawks, lecture Oct 2017 Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison

According to Harvard professor of genetics David Reich, Africa has “the greatest human diversity in genetics in the world.” Genomics Prof. Sarah Tiskhoff agrees, “when studying African populations… you’re going to see they’re very genetically diverse within and between groups.” (UPenn lecture, Jan. 2020)

As human geneticist Robin McKie notes, “Neanderthal DNA is absent in people of African origins because they remained in our species’s homeland.” (The Guardian, 2018). However, very recent genetics studies suggest some mainly upper Continental Africa tribes like the Yoruba and Fulani might have tiny traces of Neanderthal, up to .3%. This came largely via introgression by back-migrating Euros with Neanderthal DNA. (Science Mag 2020)

Less clear are genetic markers from ghost populations in the Afro-genome. As genetics magazine Helix notes, “The genetics of Africa and a mysterious human population,” 2018: “Current research indicates that between 2-7% of the DNA in some modern African people may come from this unknown archaic human group.”

Svante Pääbo on a possible archaic mix: “I think there’s good reason to think that they mixed with other forms inside of Africa. There’s some indications of that in the genomes of present day Africans.” (UCTV 2018).

>>508158124
His colleague and friend, Pascal Gagneux, Dir. of the Center for Anthropology at UCD-San Diego, conference June 8, 2019 agrees: “They [Africans] do not have that 2% of Neanderthal. They have some other archaic introgression, which is super interesting.”

Òscar Lao, principal investigator at the National Centre for Genome Analysis (CNAG-CRG) Phys.org, 2019: “What has surprised us [on] genetic diversity found in African populations today, the presence… of an extinct archaic African population, with whom anatomically modern humans would have mixed,” he adds. This result indicates that not only were there archaic populations different from the sapiens lineage outside Africa… but that within this continent there were sub-populations with which anatomically modern humans who remained in Africa had offspring.”

The identity of the African admixture is still unconfirmed. But researchers seem to be closing in. Arun Durvasula and Sriram Sankararaman from the University of California in Los Angeles have described the ancestor as a “ghost species” or quite possibly Homo naledi a “small-brained hominin” on the “African plains 250,000 years ago.”

John Hawks has suggested Homo naledi as the source of the African admixture on a number of occasions, including a 2013, “Ghost and Hybrids” lecture, “Naledi lived among our diversified species. Signatures within African populations show that there were contributions within Africa from groups that are different from each other as Neanderthals and Denisovans are from us… we have ghost populations inside Africa… something like Homo naledi might represent that ghost population.”

But there’s another contender: “Homo heidelbergensis was a more advanced hominin living in Africa circa 200,000 years ago and a more probable contestant.”

>>508157414

Are they related to the Ghost of Kyiv somehow?

>>508156714
>you can't prove they're a different species because they can still racemix
Yet felinidae and panthera can breed just fine from time to time.
It's odd how this antiquated classification is pulled out of the 19th century closet the moment it becomes useful, when it usually is relegated to the racist past.

>>508158193
Lindsay Barone of Cold Harbor Springs Inst. in NY explains (YouTube) that Heidelbergensis, Homo naledi and Homo sapiens were all roaming around Africa at the same time 300,000 years ago. “About 325,000 years ago there were anatomically modern humans, there were Homo heidelbergensis, and very soon after that a later species called Homo naledi.”

Peter Frost (NatGeo) suggests, about 13% of the African genome comes from these archaic “paleo-Africans” who “lacked something modern humans had” putting them at a disadvantage. Frost writes this might explain the “limited capacity for symbolic thinking and social organization.”

Very recent fossil finds suggest “a little-brained shadow lineage was lingering on from a much earlier period,” at the same time Homo sapiens roamed the African plains.

Omer Gokcumen, prof. of biology at the Univ. of Buffalo believes “This unknown human relative could be a species that has been discovered, such as a subspecies of Homo erectus…” (BigThink.com 2018).

Gokumen has done extensive research on the “important mucin protein called MUC7 that is found in saliva.” What they found, “a group of genomes from Sub-Saharan Africa presented a variant of MUC7 that was extremely different to versions observed in all other modern human populations.” This strongly suggested “ancient hominim” introgression into modern Africans. (AncientNews.net, 2017)

Note – Homo erectus spread worldwide over 1 million years ago. Homo ergaster is considered by some to be the African branch of Erectus. Heidelbergensis is believed to have emerged from Ergaster/Erectus. (Smithsonian). Late Heidelbergensis is putative Homo rhodesiensas.

Still, another possibility for modern African admixture, could be Australopithecus sediba, first discovered by Dr. Lee Berger (and his son Matthew) at a cave in Malapa in 2008. Did Sediba survive much later than originally believed?

>>508158216
The Ghost of Shieee

>>508157465

She looks so cute I want to pinch her cheeks :^)

>>508154526 (OP)

Homo criminalus.

>>508158274
From ScienceNews.org, April 2020, archaeological dig at the Drimolen cave in SA: “Researchers previously determined that two Australopithecus species, A. africanus and A. sediba, inhabited nearby parts of South Africa approximately 2 million years ago. The South African H. erectus fossils may be slightly older than those of A. sediba, but a controversial proposal that A. sediba was an ancestor of the Homo genus remains in play, [Texas A&M paleo-anthropologist Darryl] de Ruiter says.”

Berger, Resident Explorer at National Geographic believes Africans’ admixture could be with his newer discovery, “primitive… tiny brain” Homo naledi (NatGeo 2015), and adds moderns and archaics lived side-by-side and may even have interbred: “You can imagine how disruptive that might have been.”

https://subspecieist.com/subspecieist-definitive-guide/

>>508157252
>The genetic distance between Caucasians and sub-Saharan Africans can be as large as 0.2%, yet they can interbreed with fertile offspring. The genetic distance between Homo sapiens sapiens and Neanderthals is less, (<0.08%)
What's your source ? AI says 0.3 for Neanderthals and 0.1 for blacks.
>Inb4 AI is shit
I know. What's your source
>There are many examples where taxonomists have classified two animals as different species even though they can and do interbreed.
Maybe taxonomists fucked up and thought bears can't interbreed for example and then later neglected to revise the taxonomy.
I mean, define species.

>>508158124
Here's another article from Lan 2025 that points to homo naledi.
https://www.unz.com/article/race-realism-vindicated-archaic-human-dna-found-in-black-africans/
Author is Spencer J. Quinn. This was the article I was looking for.

>>508157531
What about it ? Le "ghost" could be a completely unknown hominid or the one that's known but the DNA is unknown
The point is
>West Africans have it
>East Africans don't
>Are W and E Africans different enough to presume the unknown hominid admixture made a significant impact
>>508158216
The Ghost of Helsinki

>>508158583
>What's your source ?
Something in this book/PDF. Hyperlinks/sources don't work
https://files.catbox.moe/4uqc7z.pdf

>>508157465
I don't remember but the first one involved the rainbow serpent.

Another was probably the neolithic collapse. This is where you get the giant myths.

Another was the collapse of the first civilizations.

>>508157465

>>508154526 (OP)
Homo naledi

A late early hominid species

>>508159180
>It's just West Africans though. You're being very Jewish
You're just arguing semantics. Not the point..

Anyways..
>Here’s a clue: sometimes the map is the territory.
What do you make of that clue?
https://x.com/shroktoad/status/1905670800683798970

>>508160131
Or?

>>508156922
Checked. Habilis went extinct too far back. It has to be a more modern species. Erectus, or possibly an intermediate we haven’t discovered yet. We keep finding new ones.

>>508160258
>Habilis went extinct too far back. It has to be a more modern species
>>508154831
Don't know how accurate this table is but what do you think?

Dude niggers are the missing link between apes and humans. It’s so fuckin obvious

>>508159765
Niggers hate the phrase homo habilis or habiloid a lot more

>Not having monkey DNA
>Feels good man

>>508159390
So a patent attorney and an amateur composer wrote a book in 2008 even though the Neanderthal genome had "high coverage" in 2014 and Homo Erectus DNA hasn't been sequenced to this day.
Sounds like a shit book but can you give me the page where he says it
>>508160131
>You're just arguing semantics.
Not at all, I'm saying that the huge populations of Africa don't have it.
Are you at the end of the rope anon so you reach for more kike dialectics ?
Why won't you address the argument ?

Most primates do not form hierarchies. They gather spontaneously around the nearest fertile female and beg for attention. Instead of forming strata they chase away the younger offspring. The natural tendency among lower primates is to exclude or dispose of the younger offspring (particularly male) to maintain dominance hierarchies. This behavior towards young males is only balanced by the social organization implemented by primates proficient in communication. If communication is but a tool for pointing with words, it is easy to understand why the upright primate, which is the tool wielding species, will utilize language to establish order among communities.

>>508158299
>she
That's a man.

>>508157465
>How many earth changing events happened during that time and humans had to start over from scratch.
We're pretty good about detecting the aerosol output of even fairly primitive industry, so if there were successive collapses, they probably were for societies that never got much farther than bronze age farmers.

>>508161473
>https://files.catbox.moe/4uqc7z.pdf
Page 354

>>508161201
Erectus lasted long enough to be a possibility, but they split off so far back from homo sap that successful interbreeding is probably iffy. Naledi is possible since the papers suggest they could have coexisted at the same time.
It’s really hard to say with any degree of certainty, though. The error margin in dating is large, and identifying a given fossil as a particular species is often very iffy.
They’ll likely figure it out eventually. Not that it will make any difference to the “one race” crowd.

What are the political implications of Africans being a different species because they fucked monkeys after humanity first existed?

>>508162241
If they’d gotten that far we’d have dug up their pottery. Ceramics lasts forever unless you grind them to dust.

>>508162368
Paragraph 20 says "we share at least 99.5% of genes with Neanderthals"
So he's just throwing around random numbers.
Either way
>He made those claims before the Neanderthal genome was mapped so he couldn't have possibly known
>The current estimate is 0.3% distance Homo Sapiens to Neanderthal and 0.1 black to white

>>508162241
My suspicion is we retain a little of our knowledge with each collapse and we've never been more advanced than we are today. I'm sure there are things we've forgotten that we still haven't rediscovered yet. We are currently technologically advanced enough that I think we will come out of the next disaster relatively unscathed. If I'm gonna go schizo conspiracy, we have near free energy, but they are waiting to bust it out after the disaster when the oil infrastructure is gone. It would be a real good tool for control.

Homo Erectus is an aquatic ape. Uprightness is an adaptation to swimming and living a semi aquatic life. It is intuitively obvious and provable that the actual speciation which occurs among higher apes is the ability to swim and stand upright. When I say swim I do not mean dog paddle like Michael Phelps, but as a method obligated to a fully upright resting posture. There is nothing incorrect or pathological about the appearance of Akhenaten. He is a good example of an upright ape. He is the ape that swims and walks with his legs to free the hands for tool use as he is correctly depicted. What we call Homo Erectus is more correctly identified by the event we point to in which the ape survived by standing upright. Uprightness is the most robust configuration for optimal cognitive function. He who stands upright does not use his hands to walk. His brain, which evolved for balancing on two legs, is equally useful for abstraction. If communication is but a tool for pointing with words, it is easy to understand why the upright primate, which is the tool wielding species, will utilize language to establish order among communities. It was made possible therefore to use language as a recursive extension of his cognitive domain. The dominance hierarchy for the upright primate was able to extend beyond Erectus alone.

>>508154526 (OP)
You can tell something is up because there is no mention at all of blacks in antiquity. No Roman or Greek sources, no legends. Nothing. There aren't even medieval mentions.

They first appear in London in I think the 1530s as an object of intense curiosity brought back by sailors. This in one of the world's most important ports and well connected cities where every nationality was long known amd hundreds of years after the first Jews.

My guess is they are what the Golem legend is about and are the result of a slave/weapon breeding program by post-temple quasi-Jews of the 15th Century. Part ape, part Jew. The Blacks themselves also do claim the similar, saying they are the real Jews. From Nigeria to Zimbabwe. Descended from, at least.

Not totally correct to equate a Middle Ages proto-Jew with them today. Much less culturally and ethnically distinct then and non-Christian scripture was not written down and became the Talmud much later.

>>508162740
Potentially, but if they were built around river deltas and generally lowlands closer to the sea, most of the land would have been swallowed by glacial melt water. You wouldn't find their clay artifacts, except when accidentally dredging them up while fishing.
Doggerland in Europe or Sundaland in South Asia, for example. I've seen it hypothesized, albeit without a ton of evidence, that the Sumerians were such a group, that came North into the Mesopotamia region being pushed by the rising seas in the Persian Gulf - that being why they spoke such a language isolate and why they had myths about arriving from the sea.

>>508154526 (OP)
Why did you screenshot these retarded fucking tweets

>>508156714
Lions and tigers produce fertile offspring. If a tomcat could hold down a lioness there is a good chance they would be fertile too.

>>508157966
lmao why didn’t I think of this before. Occam’s razor

>>508158216
>Are they related to the Ghost of Kyiv somehow?
Same use to wider society. Also niggers.

>>508154526 (OP)
The neger

>>508162241
74kya: Toba Super-Eruption
42kya: Laschamp Event: Earth's magnetic field reversed
41.5kya: Kurile Fissure Eruption (Kamchatka)
40kya: Neanderthals extinct
30kya: Aira Super-Eruption (Japan)
- 27kya: Oruanui Super-Eruption (New Zealand)
26-20kya: Last Glacial Maximum:
- Global temps 6-8°C (11-15°F) colder than now
- Sea level 125m lower (410ft) than now
- Glaciers covered northern America & Europe
14kya: Meltwater Pulse 1A: sea level ≈ -110m-80m
13kya: Meltwater Pulse 1B: sea level ≈ -80m-60m
12.9-11.7kya: Younger Dryas: colder Europe
11.7kya: Meltwater Pulse 1C: "the deluge" -60m-55m (fast)
11.7-7.7kya: Sea levels rise -55m?-5m (last 5m takes until today)
10kya: Eifel Eruption (German/Belgian border): VEI 6
10.4-9.9kya: Grimsvötn Volcano (Iceland): 500 years of eruptions
Saksunarvatn Tephra: geological term for 500 year ash mixed layer
8.2kya: massive Lake Agassiz drains into Hudson Bay
8.2kya: 8.2-kiloyear event: sea level rises 2m; temps dip 2°C for a bit
8kya: Vesuvius "Mercato" Eruption (Italy): VEI 6
8kya: Black Sea Deluge: Mediterranean burst Bosporus
7kya: Crater Lake Eruption (Oregon): VEI 7
7kya: Kikai-Akahoya Eruption (Japan): VEI 7
3.8kya: Vesuvius "Avellino" Eruption (Italy): VEI 6
2.6kya: Santorini Eruption

>>508154526 (OP)
Blacks are literally and unironically a different species.

>>508154526 (OP)

This has been proven by geneticists, but isn't something that's openly discussed. As I recall, there are 3 distinct lines; Asian, Northern European, and African.
You can go on to argue that two are advanced and the third isn't, but that's a volcanic discussion to have.

>>508154526 (OP)
I believe the "ghost hominid" is the subsaharan Africans themselves. The original theory is incorrect. They don't share 20% of their DNA with an unknown hominid. They themselves are 100% the unknown hominid and are not members of the same species as whites.

>>508163272
Because they're all popular accounts in the "racist", "right-wing", HBD (human biodiversity), BAP "sphere", you stupid fucking nigger. They have no reason to lie about something like this

>>508158583
> AI says
retard

>>508155292
Thats due to hybrids. Most american variants are hybrids and carry about 20% human DNA.

>>508167657
Fucking imbecile

>>508154526 (OP)
Gigantopithecus