>>508178079>>508178125> When did it start? It seems mid 1880s from my analysis.
> Could we be in a different timelines completely?It seems there's evidence we have about 1000 years (maybe to the year exactly) of made up bullshit history where nothing seems to have changed. They call this the DaRk AgEs, basically.
Your thoughts anons?
>>508178179>Where the mud from?Well, you could melt ice causing first massive climate changes, like rains, mega-river floodings that slowly dissipate and turn into rivers of mud. Oceans/lakes/rivers then remain much higher than before and the wet mud settles out due to gravity, covering things. Or maybe they had some unknown tech that can push and pull different minerals and elements around, kind of like magnetics, using resonance/sounds/vibrations etc.
To me this isn't as important as to whether it happened. The same questions get asked about 9/11. We saw the towers explode in front of our eyes, and we know they trucked it all out to a landfill thats covered under dozens of feet of gravel and cement and has armed guards 24/7, and the steel was all (every ounce) sent to China to be 'recycled.' This is all a fact. But somehow, because the phsyical evidence was systematically destroyed (and very meticulously, for obvious reasons), now the burden of proof is on the trutherfags, ipso facto 9/11 conspiracy is now tinfoil bullshit. Does that change what actually happened on 9/11? of course not.
We need to just examine what once was, where it was, how it was claimed to be built and for what purpose. I really like the "coffee palace of Melbourne (c.1888)"
>picrel
