Anonymous
ID: Ud97mPCY
6/21/2025, 11:03:51 AM No.508177179
>North Korea gets nuke
>Does nothing
>Iran tries to get nuke
>WW3
Wtf it doesn't make any sense.
>Does nothing
>Iran tries to get nuke
>WW3
Wtf it doesn't make any sense.
Replies:
Thread 508177179 - /pol/ [Archived: 1033 hours ago]
Anonymous
ID: x9aAke4l
6/21/2025, 11:24:41 AM No.508178209
>>508177179 (OP)
one is a monarchy who just wants to be left alone to maintain its power, the other are death cult radicals who are overt about their intentions top wipe out another country.
Does that clear things up for you?
one is a monarchy who just wants to be left alone to maintain its power, the other are death cult radicals who are overt about their intentions top wipe out another country.
Does that clear things up for you?
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: s/3VV9cC
6/21/2025, 11:27:01 AM No.508178318
Israel is only within striking distance of Iran.
Anonymous
ID: GHsRN25X
6/21/2025, 11:27:34 AM No.508178353
>>508178209
>monarchy
LOL
If fatty and his sister were killed the top brass would be infighting over who gets to be dictator next
>monarchy
LOL
If fatty and his sister were killed the top brass would be infighting over who gets to be dictator next
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: q0vAQvjx
6/21/2025, 11:29:00 AM No.508178434
>>508178209
He typed Iran not Israel.
He typed Iran not Israel.
Anonymous
ID: AskEeyTI
6/21/2025, 11:29:05 AM No.508178439
Bruh, I think someone is trying to bamboozle us!
Anonymous
ID: hZ1+WPww
6/21/2025, 11:29:33 AM No.508178457
Are they real though?
Anonymous
ID: 8pob1ckm
6/21/2025, 11:29:45 AM No.508178472
>>508178209
>the other are death cult radicals who are overt about their intentions top wipe out another country.
But Israel already has nukes, OP is talking about Iran.
>the other are death cult radicals who are overt about their intentions top wipe out another country.
But Israel already has nukes, OP is talking about Iran.
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: x9aAke4l
6/21/2025, 11:31:45 AM No.508178559
>>508178353
>monarchy
>LOL
>If fatty and his sister were killed the top brass would be infighting over who gets to be dictator next
typical
>monarchy
>LOL
>If fatty and his sister were killed the top brass would be infighting over who gets to be dictator next
typical
Anonymous
ID: T845X2og
6/21/2025, 11:36:22 AM No.508178806
>>508177179 (OP)
The jews are a paranoid people
The jews are a paranoid people
Anonymous
ID: x9aAke4l
6/21/2025, 11:50:44 AM No.508179560
>>508178472
if israel was a death cult they'd have used their nukes already, checkmate
if israel was a death cult they'd have used their nukes already, checkmate
Anonymous
ID: 9yvbibGS
6/21/2025, 11:55:51 AM No.508179797
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: HuOWYspJ
6/21/2025, 11:58:24 AM No.508179942
>>508177179 (OP)
I agree, there shouldn't be a monopoly or a restriction on what weapons a country or a person owns or wishes to use.
I agree, there shouldn't be a monopoly or a restriction on what weapons a country or a person owns or wishes to use.
Anonymous
ID: jbsCw0ZQ
6/21/2025, 11:59:12 AM No.508179977
>>508178472
>>508178209
Regardless of Israel's history as a state sponsor of terrorism, which I agree with you about, Iran has been uniquely willing to arm radical non-state groups that then go on to use those arms in attacks on civilians and commerce.
No nation on earth is as likely to give a nuke to terrorists as Iran, not even Israel, and certainly not the Norks. Both of those nations have a history of belligerence, but not the reckless wanton belligerence of Iran.
Iran attacked the US Embassy in Tehran, a violation of about the only "sacred" thing in Diplomacy.
Iran attacked Athletes at the Olympics.
Iran supplies the Houthis missiles to attack random container ships because a jew looked at them once. ignoring the fact that the crew, the ones actually being attack are flips or w/e, a good chance even that they are Muslim flips.
No one is worried about Kim giving a nuke to some lunatic who will use it to make a political/religious "statement" by vaporizing a few thousand innocents.
Kim will use his nukes to secure himself against regime change, and that is a reasonable thing.
I am NOT in favor of War with Iran or US involvement, but to compare Kim to the Ayatollahs is legit unfair to Kim, none of the Kim's have been half as unhinged as the succesion of religious crazies that run Iran. If their nuke program gets obliterated by whatever means I will feel relief for the random innocent people that it will now never kill.
Israel getting nuked is not a good enough payoff to allow Islamist radicals to have nukes.
>>508178209
Regardless of Israel's history as a state sponsor of terrorism, which I agree with you about, Iran has been uniquely willing to arm radical non-state groups that then go on to use those arms in attacks on civilians and commerce.
No nation on earth is as likely to give a nuke to terrorists as Iran, not even Israel, and certainly not the Norks. Both of those nations have a history of belligerence, but not the reckless wanton belligerence of Iran.
Iran attacked the US Embassy in Tehran, a violation of about the only "sacred" thing in Diplomacy.
Iran attacked Athletes at the Olympics.
Iran supplies the Houthis missiles to attack random container ships because a jew looked at them once. ignoring the fact that the crew, the ones actually being attack are flips or w/e, a good chance even that they are Muslim flips.
No one is worried about Kim giving a nuke to some lunatic who will use it to make a political/religious "statement" by vaporizing a few thousand innocents.
Kim will use his nukes to secure himself against regime change, and that is a reasonable thing.
I am NOT in favor of War with Iran or US involvement, but to compare Kim to the Ayatollahs is legit unfair to Kim, none of the Kim's have been half as unhinged as the succesion of religious crazies that run Iran. If their nuke program gets obliterated by whatever means I will feel relief for the random innocent people that it will now never kill.
Israel getting nuked is not a good enough payoff to allow Islamist radicals to have nukes.
Anonymous
ID: jbsCw0ZQ
6/21/2025, 12:02:19 PM No.508180135
>>508179797
that threat hasnt been valid for a while now, modern counter batter is effective enough and fast enough that that artillery would be silenced quickly, since obviously part of the plan would be emplacing enough counter battery to suppress that threat.
Its not like the US and RoK have just been sitting there waiting to be barraged for 70 years. They have their own artillery in place and have problem spend the last seven decades autistically mapping out every position within 50 miles of the border that its even vaguely possible to place a gun. Not like there a helluva lot else to do when stationed there.
that threat hasnt been valid for a while now, modern counter batter is effective enough and fast enough that that artillery would be silenced quickly, since obviously part of the plan would be emplacing enough counter battery to suppress that threat.
Its not like the US and RoK have just been sitting there waiting to be barraged for 70 years. They have their own artillery in place and have problem spend the last seven decades autistically mapping out every position within 50 miles of the border that its even vaguely possible to place a gun. Not like there a helluva lot else to do when stationed there.