I want a visual confirmation of the collapse. Of the "complete obliteration". Trump is a proven liar. You should never take at face value anything that he says. Also, Iran evacuated the facilities yesterday. The enriched uranium wasn't destroyed.

Going by the FIRMS data, he didn't even hit the fucking thing

>>508270084 (OP)
it's about 45m of hard stone under the ridge of that hill, maybe 55m if they tunneled at a slope. Even with the 12 ton MOP, that might not make it to the centrifuge hall.
>drop another bomb down the same hole
doesn't work like that

Yes, I'm not believing anything until I see the official damage assessment report and more aerial/sat imagery.

>>508271644
>hard stone
checked, hard rock anon. But yes we know what you meant
Also, the GBU-57 won't penetrate that much granite. It is reported that a total of six (6) of them were used on Fordow, presumably ? they were used at the less-emplaced tunnel entrances in goal of making the site into a virtual sarcophagus.

None of what has been reported thus far about "a total crater" or "demolished" makes any sense or is verifiable/believable.

>>508270528
Interesting. The other two nuclear plants were already hit by Pissrael and Grumf hit them with tomahawks. Fordo is the only one that matters.

>>508272168
>>508271754
His claims seem unplausible and he was have a religious psychosis during the press conference, kek. We really have to wait and see. Also, I want an analysis from Russia or China.

Quick question....wouldn't blowing up the nukes make the nukes blow up? Doesn't this prove that Iran didn't have nukes?

>>508273961
I don't know if you've seen the recent declarations. But USA announced Iran since yesterday they will attack the nuclear facilities. Iran evacuated all personnel and anything that mattered.

>>508273961
no, but the waste would go in the ground, poisoning the water underground and everything around it... that's why neighboring countries dont want nuclear powerstations hit.

You're fucking retarded

>>508276017
who cares

>>508276017
So if you bomb a nuke, the nuke blows up into the ground instead of the mushroom cloud?

tactical nuclear weapons inbound

>>508270528
you dont get it anon
B2 is stealth bomber
You cant see impact of bombs

>>508276017
Hence, why it's against international laws to bomb nuclear facilities. Trump broke international law and completely unprovoked against a sovereign state.

>>508276946
Kek.

>>508276946
I was about to tell you how much of a retard you are. Then I got it.

>>508270084 (OP)
nothing collapsed, they bombed the entrances to facility, thats it

>>508276946
Very good

>>508270528
It's 3.25 km away too. Trump should have told them to double tap.

>>508277339
Holy shit Iran nuclear program set back 2 weeks.

>>508270528
I apect a thorough bda, not whatever the fucking garbage you just posted.

>>508271644
No, it does work, it's basically the homosexual 'pile driver' but with high explosives

>>508277339
Has the Kremlin said anything yet ? Because bombing nuclear facilities is against international laws and Putin really cares about those for some reason.

>>508276998
not so sovereign

>>508277832
I pile-drive my gf. How the fuck is it gay?

>>508276793
A nuke wouldn't because there's not enough material to sustain a nuclear reaction without some help, a reactor could cause a runaway reaction and a meltdown if the facility is damaged (Fukushima)

>>508270084 (OP)
Frado was always the odd one

>>508277946
Russia has gas, Iran has gas.
Are you retarded ?
Putin gonna be rich in the next months... your stupid nafo troon will get hit with your new tax rates + the increase in gas prices.

...Romania is going to collapse in the next year.

>>508273961
the claim wasn't that Iran had nukes, the enrichment is the ability to get a nuke. so at 60% they are not far off from having enough enricheeched and then closer to the goal of having it enriched enough to make nukes. the bombs themselves are not difficult, it's the enrichment that is basically the difficult part

>>508277989
Still sovereign. Let's see all the fuckers that cried for Ukraine and imposed sanctions because Russia broke international law are gonna do/say now.

>>508276793
you've got to be trolling, but i'll answer anyway. no, you retard. the nuke wouldn't blow up into the ground, it would just leak the radioactive material down into the ground.
a nuclear bomb's primary explosion must be completely contained within the bomb, so if something else blew it up, all the force that was meant to go into the nuclear material would instead be dispersed, and no ignition would occur.

>>508277583
I wonder if this means they were shot at and they panic dropped

>>508278776
So if you launch an ICBM at a nuke, it makes the nuke harmless upon contact?