>>508354181one more thing to mention to help you, but youre probably already aware. when you click on the passage in the talmud on sefaria, the bar on the righthand side shows references to other liturgy about that passage (commentaries, halakha, jewish thought, kabbalah, etc). at the bare minimum, the commentaries are a required read to understand the context of the passage. you need to understand the context to be able to pilpul the jews who will say "thats a misunderstanding, goy"
>>508357073it still hallucinates, it cannot be trusted. it is not just a search engine, it WILL give false results, or straight up lie to you. ESPECIALLY about the talmud. ive had it tell me blatant contradictions, or tell me the "goy version" of what the article means. then i give it another tractate to show its being a pilpulling kike, or ill copy the hebrew of some tosafist's commentary and it will say "ah well yeah uh.. i guess it is viewed like that uh well i was wrong.. in that context yeahhh but blah blah" and then chatgpt deletes the response because it starts to analyze the talmud and says naughty words.
you need to have it cite its sources. you need to confirm what "modern" halakha says about it - specifically in regards to orthodox/ultra orthodox/hasidic interpretations. you need to have it, preferably, attempt to analyze the original hebrew/aramaic itself, instead of using the censored english translations.
its the jews, and they lawyered the shit out of their liturgy. it is not easy to study the talmud and be able to, beyond the shadow of a doubt, be able to argue against the "thats a misunderstanding, goy!" inevitable argument. ketubot 11a/11b for example - those tractates cant be used in good faith for the 3yo claim. that one is just jews jewing about what a 3-12yo would get for a dowry, and if she had wood used on her beforehand for some reason, then she can still get the full dowry. it is weird that they talk about it yeah, but thats all you can say there.