Anonymous
ID: Jj5uE6Rj
6/22/2025, 3:49:46 PM No.508330603
It is overall good for humanity that the Iranian nuclear program has been destroyed.
We have had nuclear weapons since 1945 and so far 9 countries have acquired nukes. You might say that mutually assured destruction prevents anyone from making a nuclear first strike. However, nuclear annihilation close calls have still happened nearly every decade, mostly due fo faulty systems and human error.
It's clear that nuclear weapons are not going everywhere, since there is not going to be a worldwide denuclearization effort and defense systems to destroy nukes mid-flight will never become 100% effective. Therefore humanity will have to deal with nukes for the next 10,000 years.
The question is - how does humanity survive? It seems pretty clear to me that the only way to decrease the risk of nuclear annihilation is to minimize the amount of countries that have access to nukes. Every new nuclear power adds an additional point of failure - more countries that could fall under a regime crazy enough to conduct a first strike, more nuclear weapons that could get captured by terrorist groups, and more unpredicatable chaos in case the country balkanizes. A lot of the nuclear material the Soviet Union had stored in Kazakhstan still remains unaccounted for.
I wholeheartedly support this strike. Humanity should set a precedent that every state that tries to start a new nuclear program has their facilities immediately glassed. In fact, this should have happened with North Korea too. I don't give a shit about Israel but this is the only action that makes sense for humanity's long term survival.
We have had nuclear weapons since 1945 and so far 9 countries have acquired nukes. You might say that mutually assured destruction prevents anyone from making a nuclear first strike. However, nuclear annihilation close calls have still happened nearly every decade, mostly due fo faulty systems and human error.
It's clear that nuclear weapons are not going everywhere, since there is not going to be a worldwide denuclearization effort and defense systems to destroy nukes mid-flight will never become 100% effective. Therefore humanity will have to deal with nukes for the next 10,000 years.
The question is - how does humanity survive? It seems pretty clear to me that the only way to decrease the risk of nuclear annihilation is to minimize the amount of countries that have access to nukes. Every new nuclear power adds an additional point of failure - more countries that could fall under a regime crazy enough to conduct a first strike, more nuclear weapons that could get captured by terrorist groups, and more unpredicatable chaos in case the country balkanizes. A lot of the nuclear material the Soviet Union had stored in Kazakhstan still remains unaccounted for.
I wholeheartedly support this strike. Humanity should set a precedent that every state that tries to start a new nuclear program has their facilities immediately glassed. In fact, this should have happened with North Korea too. I don't give a shit about Israel but this is the only action that makes sense for humanity's long term survival.
Replies:
