So I want to start this thread by highlighting the Christian virtues.

Now the first above all is love
>37Jesus declared, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’e 38This is the first and greatest commandment. 39And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’f 40All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”
What we learn here is that everything else in the commandments and law is an expression of love and a guideline on how to express love in a healthy and prosperous way, an effort to not harm those we love.

the next big one would be truth and honesty for
>6Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
If Christ is the truth, and the Christ is God, then subsequently God is the truth, meaning that truthfulness is equal to worshipping God.

Subsequently rightousness comes forth from the truthfulness
>15Surely judgment will again be righteous, and all the upright in heart will follow it.
>16Who will rise up for me against the wicked? Who will stand for me against the workers of iniquity?

And to uphold the rightousness we must be strong and coragous
>24Be strong and courageous, all you who hope in the LORD.

But never the less be gentle and work solely for the good of all and not for your own satisfaction or glorification
>5Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth
Which means to care for your people
>7Give these instructions to the believers, so that they will be above reproach. 8If anyone does not provide for his own, and especially his own household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.
And those in need
>40And the King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of Mine, you did for Me.’

>>508341614 (OP)
In the same sense forgiving others their errors that they may improve themselves, and allow for peacemaking rather than keeping meaningless and pitty grudges
>14For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive yours.
Which must not mean to enable anothers sin
>11Have no fellowship with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.

And to end it we are to remain humble in our deeds
>23A man’s pride will bring him low, but a humble spirit will obtain honor.
And not become boastful
>3Do not boast so proudly, or let arrogance come from your mouth, for the LORD is a God who knows, and by Him actions are weighed.

All I have on Christianity, the teachings, morals, philosophy, law, history, origin etc.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/442494416

Some more specific parts
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/493495206/

Some older thread that includes some stuff i had to cut out due to space reasons
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/392101355

>>508341614 (OP)

All christkikes are monkeys who created globohomo.

All christkikes love jews.

>>508341614 (OP)

Historical Timing — “In the Fullness of Time” (Gal. 4:4)
"But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son..."

Everything was divinely aligned:

Roman Empire: Crucifixion, a Roman method, fulfilled Psalm 22—prophesied before it even existed.
Pax Romana: Peace and roads enabled Gospel travel.
Greek Language: A common tongue (Koine Greek) helped spread the message.

Prophetic Precision
Jesus fulfilled 300+ prophecies:

Psalm 22: “They pierced my hands and feet.”

Isaiah 53: A servant suffers for sins.

Zechariah 12:10: “They will look on Me whom they have pierced.”
If He died by stoning (Jewish method), these wouldn’t be fulfilled—it had to be Rome, and it had to be the cross.


Jewish Calendar Alignment
Jesus died during Passover, becoming the true Passover Lamb (1 Cor. 5:7).
At His death, the Temple veil tore (Matt. 27:51)—access to God was opened.

Free Will + Divine Control
Judas betrayed Him. Pilate caved. Leaders schemed.
Yet Acts 2:23 says: “This man was handed over...by God’s deliberate plan.”
Even evil choices fulfilled a perfect design.

Symbolic Geography
Jesus died outside the city (Heb. 13:12), like sin offerings.
Golgotha, the “Place of the Skull,” echoes death and sacrifice.
Some believe His blood reached the hidden Mercy Seat below.

Every Detail Mattered
A different day—no Passover.
No betrayal—no arrest.
No Romans—no cross.
No silence—no sentence.
Yet every thread was perfectly woven. History held its breath.

>>508342348

Next I want to point out that the only universal aspect about the Christian faith would be the offering of forgiveness and and salvation to all, as well as to whom the moral laws apply to (as opposed to jewd who claim you can lie to, steal from or kill a non jew as it all doesnt aplly to them, being deemed cattle).

People being up Paul saying
>There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither man nor woman, there is neither slave nor master, for you are all one in Christ Jesus
alleging that this is egalitarianism however is retarded. some other veses Paul
>5A woman must not wear men’s clothing, and a man must not wear women’s clothing, for whoever does these things is detestable to the LORD your God.
or
>34 Women are to be silent in the churches. They are not permitted to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says.
a clear difference is mentioned in how faitfull women and men should act, in line with previous established customs, showing that Galatians doesnt revoke those
another
>12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; she is to remain quiet. 13For Adam was formed first, and then Eve.
Or here, on class instead of gender
>5 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear and sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.
So when class and gender are not abolished, though they are one in Christ, why then should we abolish race as a concept and ignore the other laws around that (pic related)

As a result it clearly means all can be saved regardless of gender, ethnicity or class, and that Christ came for all, not that we are to abolish these concepts

>>508342348

>>508341614 (OP)
>truths
In biblical narratives, marriage is more than just a social contract but a profound metaphor for divine truth. As the the Church represents the bride of Christ.

[Jhn 14:3 KJV] 3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, [there] ye may be also.

Now let us take a look at the jewish customs and the talnmud

https://www.vice.com/en/article/qbe8bp/the-child-rape-assembly-line-0000141-v20n11
Probably the only article worth reading from vice

Also
Ketubot 11b6:
>Rava said that this is what the mishna is saying: An adult man who engaged in intercourse with a minor girl less than three years old has done nothing, as intercourse with a girl less than three years old is tantamount to poking a finger into the eye. In the case of an eye, after a tear falls from it another tear forms to replace it. Similarly, the ruptured hymen of the girl younger than three is restored. And a young boy who engaged in intercourse with an adult woman renders her as one whose hymen was ruptured by wood. And with regard to the case of a woman whose hymen was ruptured by wood itself, there is a dispute between Rabbi Meir and the Rabbis. Rabbi Meir maintains that her marriage contract is two hundred dinars, and the Rabbis maintain that it is one hundred dinars.

>>508344134
This is Also the reasons that idoltry is often refered to as prostitution or adultery, as they are unfaithful in their spiritual marriage to God and whore around, prostating them before other "men", gods for some cheap money/weak blessing.
In example in Ezekiel 23 the 2 sisters are representive of Judah and Israel, which prostituted them in egypt by taking up their gods and then later for the assyrians as well.

>>508345203
Avoda Zarah 26a
>The mishna teaches that a Jewish woman may not nurse the child of a gentile woman. The Sages taught: A Jewish woman may not nurse the child of a gentile woman because in doing so she is effectively raising a child who will engage in idol worship. And one may not allow a gentile woman to nurse the child of a Jewish woman because she is suspected of bloodshed; this is the statement of Rabbi Meir.
Jews are to neglect gentile children because they would become idolators either way

>Abaye said to him: It is prohibited to raise a gentile from a pit even in exchange for payment, because one can say an excuse to him, such as: My son is standing on the roof and I must go use this ladder to help him down from the roof. Alternatively, he can say to him: A time has been appointed for me to appear in the courthouse [bei davar] and I must attend to this matter. Since the Jew can provide a legitimate excuse for refusing to aid the gentile, there is no need to extract him from the pit.
Just leave the goyim to die and make an excuse why you cant help him

>The Gemara discusses the subject of assisting or receiving aid from a gentile in the context of circumcision. The Sages taught: A Jew may circumcise a gentile for the sake of making him a convert. This is to the exclusion of circumcising a gentile for the sake of removing a worm [murna], which is not permitted, as it is forbidden to heal a gentile. But one may not allow a gentile to circumcise a Jew in any situation, because gentiles are suspected of bloodshed. This is the statement of Rabbi Meir.
A jew must not give medical assistence to a goy
Additionally the whole religion is centered around celebrating the murder of an innocent man

>>508345203
>2 sisters are representive of Judah and Israel, which prostituted them in egyp
And that is why Jesus hung out with prostitutes and went to the "lost house of Israel". He will save them, but they will be last, the end of time.

[Mat 19:30 KJV] 30 But many [that are] first shall be last; and the last [shall be] first.

i want to put attention to some details in the Eden story.

The term for serpent itself has multiple layers. the word for "serpent" is "nachash"
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/5175.htm
which is the same word and thus probably a pun for "enchanter" or "wizard",
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/5172.htm
its also to money lender
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/5377.htm
or to deceive
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/5378.htm

Also there is a class of angel is called "Seraph"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seraph
>A seraph (/ˈsɛrəf/, "the burning one"/"serpent";
A class of angels being refered to as "serpent" so its not just a random snake there.

applying this we see how the early chapters of Genesis can be used as an allegorical warning of usury and money as a whole through the use of puns
Its a story of how making up our own morality away from God lead to evil and suffering womans proximity to earthly things leading to distress when left unchecked, something we find mirrored in the north american myths
Beyond that we see the story of 2 persons growing up, living in naive innocence, in paradise, but then wake up towards evil.
We find even some evolutionary lessons, like the snake losing its legs (being cursed to crawl on its belly) or the woman being cursed to give birth in pain which we dont see in other animals, caused by the babies big heads, needed for the big brain coming from the knowledge that cursed us
Not to mention the inherent narrative regarding sexuality

>>508346259
Well, God is autistic and the last is technically Satan.

>>508346359
the snake or satan is mostly interested in bringing the people of God to be spiritual adulterous.
he has Mammon, a fallen angel, for the monetary deception.
satan is more interested bringing you away from the realization that Jesus Christ is God who defeated satan. his best weapons nowadays is the new age movement which says all religions lead to heaven and that you can be like God with a spiritual awakening, ie law of attraction and being the god of your own future, use of psychedelics, SUNday worship etc.
as long as its not Jesus Christ youre good to go in the eyes of satan basically. leads back to the garden of eden and sowing doubt in God, "Did he REALLY say..."

pic related, case for a creator with the qualities the Bible acredits to Him, based on scientific observations.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil_(cosmology)
radiation patterns show earth is in a special position with special alignment and seems to not at all be random. this implication of higher meaning opposing the nihilistic atheism is then dubbed "axis of evil"

>>508346259
Makes it funny that the jews tried to shame Jesus for hanging out with a prostitute when that symbolized that even the jews can be saved, making them once again testify against themselves with their own mouth which likewise is a theme in the bible
>6Your own mouth, not mine, condemns you; your own lips testify against you
Or
>16For David had said to the Amalekite, “Your blood be on your own head because your own mouth has testified against you, saying, ‘I killed the LORD’s anointed.’”
And probably most notably
>25All the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!”

>>508346359
"The love of money is the root of all evil"

it's that filthy lucre, worship of the male phallus ect..

>>508346984
I think Satan is best explained on the example of the book of Job with Job taking the role of humankind.
Mankind/Job was loved by God, and he was rightouss. Then Satan said that Mankind/Job just loves Him for all the good things God gives them, and that he/we would stop caring when things would go south. So to prove Satan wrong he is allowed to take our good things away, to tempt us and try and make us fall from faith. He brings poverty, illness, famine, natural disasters just so that in the end Job/Mankind is still there and praising God.

Now one may ask why God tolerates it, but this way He proves to all in existence that Satan is wrong, God is right, while using our own wickedness to create the right struggle to make us stronger through preserverance, like hammering iron in the fire

I would add that we see the story of eden and the battle of satan and michael in many cultures, where sometimes satan isnt malicious but incompetent, kind of like the gnostic demiurge

What is a Jew?
There are multiple, at times conflicting definitions around, and let us look at everyone of them

The ethnic modern jews:
According to this definition its simply the modern ethnic group of jews. To note here is that the best case to make is that they are of edomitic descent (pic related), excluding the Israelites from this definition

The followers of judaism:
This defines jews by their adherence to judaism. To understand here is that judaism descents from phariseeism which Christ denounced as hypocritical heresies. So at least as Christian one can not hold that the prophets, the forefathers or (most of) Israel or Christ were jews.

The descendents of Israel/Jacob
According to this everyone is a jew that descends from Israel, however here we need to understand that this again excludes the modern jews, descending from Jacobs twinbrother, Esau, who fornicated with the canaanites.

A descendent of Judah
This is basically the same as the previous, only that it excludes the other 11 tribes as well. But here again the modern jews for the same reason.

A citizen of the state of Judea/Judah
This is what the term "Ioudaios" or "Iudaeorum" commonly in the Bible translated as "jews". At the time of Jesus a multitude of people were inhabiting Judea due to the babylonian captivity, the conquering of edom, and rome conquering Judeah and thus be regarded is "Ioudaios", or Judean in modern term.
This is the only definition that includes Israel, Christ as well as those we call jews today alike.

in current discourse, and especially by shills its always assumed and claimed these are all interchangable

>>508347975
>where sometimes satan isnt malicious but incompetent, kind of like the gnostic demiurge
dont underestimate him. he is the most crafty one.
Jesus never ridiculed or downplayed the ability of satan. he prayed for Peter to not lose his faith when satan asked to sift him like wheat. but what is also interesting is that satan could not enter Judas until Jesus Christ allowed him to.
John 13
“Lord, who is it?” 26 Jesus answered, “It is he to whom I will give this morsel of bread when I have dipped it.” So when he had dipped the morsel, he gave it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot. 27 Then after he had taken the morsel, Satan entered into him. Jesus said to him, “What you are going to do, do quickly.” 28 Now no one at the table knew why he said this to him. 29 Some thought that, because Judas had the moneybag, Jesus was telling him, “Buy what we need for the feast,” or that he should give something to the poor. 30 So, after receiving the morsel of bread, he immediately went out. And it was night.

also the gnostic teachings is another of satans tricks to lead you away from Christ. the underlying focus is that you can become like god and leave this cycle of "reincarnation" and be like God, which is nonsense. humans need a savior.

>>508349181
Yes, of course. I am of the Bibles oppinion that Satan is a lying murderer. I just wanted to add others accounts to show its not a story exclusive to the bible but something recorded by many people.

I also am of the oppinion that Satan takes multiple roles in a single myth, so satan fits the role of cronus, typhon and prometheus iE. Appearing in various forms to trick people.
And of course gnosticism i hold as bullshit as well.

However ido see satan as a kind of tragic figure, being full of beauty, knowledge and power, and yet, due to mere pride, falls and becomes a grotesque carricature of a creature, the ugly face of sin itself and a testament of corruption.

>>508350145
>I also am of the oppinion that Satan takes multiple roles in a single myth, so satan fits the role of cronus, typhon and prometheus iE. Appearing in various forms to trick people.
Paul described foreign gods or deities as demons, basically the minions of satan. so saying they are a picture of satan is not wrong. calling a false god satan is not wrong since they are under his authority anyway doing his deeds.

>satan as a kind of tragic figure, being full of beauty, knowledge and power, and yet
you have no idea how fucking corrupt and evil he his. when he commands Herod to kill all newborn just to ger one baby Jesus or establishing child ritual sacrifice right in front of the place where israel worshiped the Lord you get a basic idea how twisted he is.
he is nothing else but a child killer, thats how low he is to destroy the imagers of God. dont pity him even for a second, God doesnt either.

>>508350766
>calling a false god satan is not wrong since they are under his authority anyway doing his deeds.
Yeah, i wondered if the Bible compiles the work of satans brood simply as the work of satan, or if satan indeed takes on many roles to deceive the people. I tend to believe the later.
Also consider there are many satans, enemies and accusers, but only one Ha-Satan, The Satan.
As for the foreign gods it seems a bit more nuanced to me, as the angels and their works were seen and worshipped as much as that of the fallen angels, the rebells and demons. Now worshipping of angels obviously is still wrong, but we see with Paul and Barnabass that the people saw their acts and instantly tried to worship them as zeus and hermes, contrary to their desires. Similary i see it happened to the angels i believe

>>508341614 (OP)
virtues of a shitskin.
why should a white man worship a brown jewish manlet subhuman from the middle east?

>>508351492
I highly recommend you to watch the "Unseen Realm" lecture by Dr. Michael S. Heiser to gain more insight over the gods or angels over other nations. its highly interesting in understanding where they come from and why.
tl;dr after the rebellion at babel God split the nations after Noah and assigned Sons of God over each one who all became corrupt over time. God chose one nation, Israel with Abraham for his own.

>>508352352
Thats mostly my believe too, though i dont believe all became corrupt. Zeus iE seems to correlate with Michael which didnt rebell. The pic in >>508347975 explains my view in detail on the pagan gods and angels, it even includes some bit of Heiser

>>508352664
>Zeus iE seems to correlate with Michael which didnt rebell
doesnt make much sense to me. zeus claimed to be head over all other gods, more like satan. zeus was also a degenerate mating with humans, europas origin, reminding of fallen watchers.
Michael is the angel that is at war in the heavens with these false agents of satan. he doesnt have a place on earth aside from being the guardian of the chosen by God.

>>508353110
Read the pic. Zeus defeated Cronus, the titan that ate its children, symbolizing time and death. He defeated typhon the evil serpent. He chained down prometheus for bringing mankind fire (like the fruit of knowledge) where through a woman all evil was released. Christ tells us "i saw satan fall like lightning from heaven", being defeated by lightning. We know michael defeated satan and lightning is zeus thing

rome collapsed because of Christianity.
Rome had a lot of issues going on but their biggest one was their expansionism beyond any reason. It made it impossible to effectively rule the empire, and much worse to defend its borders. Whenever some tribes thought they could reclaim their lost land all battles would be over before roman armies would get there, and in the meantime 2 different fronts opened up of people seeing their chance to reconquer their old land. this chipped away from the empire slowly.
To negate this they hired barbarian mercenaries, but they costed so much they had to engage in fiat money practices not much different than our monetary system today, and that of course invites catastrophe.
This paired with rampant hedonism and egoism resulted in neglection of their people and rampant degeneracy, and eventually it caused the collapse.
simultaniosuly this neglect for their people allowed Christians to convert people through their care and love
according to Rodney Stark
>he [Emperor Julian] complained in a letter to the high priest of Galatia in 362 that the pagans needed to equal the virtues of Christians, for recent Christian growth was caused by their ‘moral character, even if pretended,’ and by their ‘benevolence toward strangers and care for the graves of the dead.’ In a letter to another priest, Julian wrote, ‘I think that when the poor happened to be neglected and overlooked by the priests, the impious Galileans observed this and devoted themselves to benevolence.’ And he also wrote, ‘The impious Galileans support not only their poor but ours as well, everyone can see that our people lack aid from us.’”

Likewise it wasnt Christianity that let jews into rome, they lived free in rome long before, without any laws against them, which only were stript of their right by the Christians after.

>Another prophet hinted at this when he said: "Israel is as obstinate as a stubborn heifer". And still another called the Jews "an untamed calf".

>(6) Although such beasts are unfit for work, they are fit for killing. And this is what happened to the Jews: while they were making themselves unfit for work, they grew fit for slaughter. This is why Christ said: "But as for these my enemies, who did not want me to be king over them, bring them here and slay them". [Luke 19:27] You Jews should have fasted then, when drunkenness was doing those terrible things to you, when your gluttony was giving birth to your ungodliness—not now. Now your fasting is untimely and an abomination. Who said so? Isaiah himself when he called out in a loud voice: "I did not choose this fast, say the Lord". Why? "You quarrel and squabble when you fast and strike those subject to you with your fists". But if your fasting was an abomination when you were striking your fellow slaves, does it become acceptable now that you have slain your Master? How could that be right?
-John Chrysostom

>>508356452
John Chrysostom
>(2) Since there are some who think of the synagogue as a holy place, I must say a few words to them. Why do you reverence that place? Must you not despise it, hold it in abomination, run away from it? They answer that the Law and the books of the prophets are kept there. What is this? Will any place where these books are be a holy place? By no means! This is the reason above all others why I hate the synagogue and abhor it. They have the prophets but not believe them; they read the sacred writings but reject their witness—and this is a mark of men guilty of the greatest outrage.

>(3) Tell me this. If you were to see a venerable man, illustrious and renowned, dragged off into a tavern or den of robbers; if you were to see him outraged, beaten, and subjected there to the worst violence, would you have held that tavern or den in high esteem because that great and esteemed man had been inside it while undergoing that violent treatment? I think not. Rather, for this very reason you would have hated and abhorred the place.
>(4) Let that be your judgment about the synagogue, too. For they brought the books of Moses and the prophets along with them into the synagogue, not to honor them but to outrage them with dishonor. When they say that Moses and the prophets knew not Christ and said nothing about his coming, what greater outrage could they do to those holy men than to accuse them of failing to recognize their Master, than to say that those saintly prophets are partners of their impiety? And so it is that we must hate both them and their synagogue all the more because of their offensive treatment of those holy men

>>508341717

>>508343452

>>508356979
>Göbbels diaries
Lmao

Reminder:
Almost all the anti christian standpoints of Hitler come from tabletalks or göbbels diary, both being fake in at least part
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13507486.2018.1532983
https://web.archive.org/web/20200315030200/http://www.nobeliefs.com/HitlerSources.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20190827005529/http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com/2011/01/goebbels-diaries-are-fake.html

everything he said openly was pro christ, even if anti church, so the question is was Hitler honest or lying like a kike he hated so much?

>Without a doubt the chancellor lives in faith in God. He recognizes Christianity as the foundation of Western culture
-Cardinal Faulhaber

As for the Jews, I am just carrying on with the same policy which the Catholic Church has adopted for fifteen hundred years, when it has regarded the Jews as dangerous and pushed them into ghettos etc., because it knew what the Jews were like.
>I don't put race above religion,
but I do see the danger in the representatives of this race for Church and State, and perhaps I am doing Christianity a great service
-Hitler

Mein Kampf
>And the Founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of His estimation of the Jewish people. When He found it necessary He drove those enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God; because then, as always, they used religion as a means of advancing their commercial interests. But at that time Christ was nailed to the Cross for his attitude towards the Jews; whereas our modern Christians enter into party politics and when elections are being held they debase themselves to beg for Jewish votes. They even enter into political intrigues with the atheistic Jewish parties against the interests of their own Christian nation

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler
>I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.

>>508341614 (OP)
you're a brown disgusting shitskins subhuman

>muh King of the Jews
It should be noted that Christ never called Himself such, and only others called him so.
I would also argue this is a heavy mistranslation. The original read
>>INRI
>Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum
>Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Judeans
Iudaeorum or the greek Ioudaios, that now get translated as "Jews" refers to the citizens of Judah >>508349121. Judah at this point was heavily multi racial after the babylonian conquest and captivity, the integration of the edomite (which are the root for those we call jews today) to the point that Herod the king at the time was an edomite, as well as the roman conquest of Judeah all caused that the actual Israelite descendents are but a fraction of the citizens. We have an assyrian tablet talking about how all of samaria was replaced with a foreign people. Yet fates, much like governance usually are tied to the location, the land and cities.
Christ came to Judeah, and was the rightful king of its people, of which "jews" are but a fraction.

In fact the the sign "INRI" states His crime, being to be the king over Judeah. Which is why the jews even demanded the sign to be changed as this sign legitimizes Christs authroity mocking the actual jews
>19Pilate also had a notice posted on the cross. It read:
>JESUS OF NAZARETH,
>THE KING OF THE JEWS.
>20Many of the Jews read this sign, because the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and it was written in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek. 21So the chief priests of the Jews said to Pilate, “Do not write, ‘The King of the Jews,’ but only that He said, ‘I am the King of the Jews.’”
>22Pilate answered, “What I have written, I have written.”

>>508359580

I want to propose that YHWH may not be the correct name.
a) Christs name would be Yahushua, meaning "Yah Saves/is salvation".
2.:Likewise its HalleluJ-AH, not Yahweh, or Yehova.
III: YHWH is יְהוָֹה God introduced Himself to Abraham as הָיָה
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/1961.htm
"Ha-Yah"
now the prefix "Ha" is a definitive article, like we here when God is called Ha-Elohim (THE Elohim) or how Satan is called Ha-Satan to distinguish from the many small satans. So here it would be "The Yah",
4th the greek script renders the tetragrammatron as "ιαω", or IAO", y, j, and i generally being the same phoenetically being Yao, or Yaho.

Now why does the Bible render YHWH as God? After Christs death the jews thought about how they can deny Christ as Messiah, and thus altered the script creating the Masoretic Text we know today. On effort the made follows that the Messiah is High Priest in the order of Melchizedek, to deny Jesus they then claimed that Melchizedek is Shem and that thus his priesthood is the levite priesthood of which Christ cant be part of, being of Judah and not Levi. But Abraham met Melchizedek and so they had to live in the same time period when Shem lived a thousand years (ca.) before, and so jews removed the lifespan of the descendents from Shem to Abraham by a 100 years each so that Shem and Abraham can live at the same time. In the greek Septuagint iE the original ages are still preserved.
Likewise the virgin that gives births as a sign for the Messiah is now turnd into simply a "young woman"

The theory goes that in the same time where they rewrote the scripture to deny Christ, that they also altered the name of God