>>508352091 (OP) > /k/ ban Dont take it personal, its a default ban board. Targets only are allowed to post there.
AnonymousID: QxGqvI4h
6/22/2025, 7:13:19 PM No.508352908
>>508352091 (OP) President Trump stated that the strikes were carried out to plan and were absolutely successful.
AnonymousID: TV2VybfV
6/22/2025, 7:14:24 PM No.508353032
>>508352091 (OP) no it was a wasted 9 killstreak trump hoped to get to 25 kills quickly but he missed because he's unskilled
AnonymousID: SmPYfA9Y
6/22/2025, 7:15:16 PM No.508353132
>>508352091 (OP) you see is a Schrรถdinger bunker it was destroyed and is intact at the same time until we check it out
AnonymousID: YPFjo3Y6
6/22/2025, 7:15:17 PM No.508353133
>>508352700 Yes. The question is if they really destroyed all irans nukes/nuke building material sites or if those were all locations, if their nukes/materials really were in those targets. But the tech appears to have worked, else you wouldnt have the depressions indicating something had caved in.
>>508352091 (OP) >I tried asking it on /k/ but they banned me Not surprising, they are an eglin board. They even have regular 'Military Enlistment General' threads, as a matter of fact they have 2 on the catalog right now.
>>508352091 (OP) >Did the B2 strike actualy do a ything? It's impossible to know because of how the bombs work. They detonate underground and don't breach the surface. You can see this on the satellite images of the bombed site, 50 bombs were dropped and it doesn't look like anything happened at all, but when you zoom you can see all the entrances are caved in and buried with dirt.
>>508353252 Arbitrary technicality. Israel and Iran are at war, and we've not only chosen a side, but have begun conducting attacks for them. We are involved in this war and are officially open to be being attacked by the opposing side, whether that gets "declared" or not.
AnonymousID: wR8McJcm
6/22/2025, 7:19:30 PM No.508353574
>>508353351 wouldn't there be radiation leaking in the air, if they actually struck nuclear sites?
>>508352091 (OP) nobody really knows. apparently, no official images have been released and the ones floating around seem to be from before attack took place.
AnonymousID: vHljJcJB
6/22/2025, 7:21:51 PM No.508353849
>>508352700 Unlikely. But unless you visit the facility you aren't going to be able to get an accurate answer.
AnonymousID: LS0pAp/n
6/22/2025, 7:23:44 PM No.508354064
>>508353582 Im autistic i need to know. >>508353351 What are rhe chances it just caved the entrances in and didnt do anything else?
AnonymousID: RTqodq2h
6/22/2025, 7:24:22 PM No.508354140
>>508352091 (OP) the highest iq take ive read here is that if nothing was blown up they would just say it was blown up and continue riching uranium once everyone forgot.
>>508352700 No. Even Boeing's marketing material indicates it would not be suitable for this mission, and that's before even taking into account specific countermeasures Iran certainly took in designing the bunker. Nothing has emerged to indicate that the bombs were miraculously much more effective than they should have been.
>>508352091 (OP) Next time say, "did the B2 strike do anything to help Ukraine?"
AnonymousID: ZKXdlyCs
6/22/2025, 7:35:05 PM No.508355439
>>508354803 oh well if Boing-Boing says it then it's settled
AnonymousID: HVNJwOdB
6/22/2025, 7:41:54 PM No.508356187
>>508352091 (OP) highly doubt it did much. If they are lucky they got 30 meters penetration and the relevant facilities are like 80 meters deep and encapsulated in high grade concrete... The entrance was damaged but that will be easily fixed