U.S. does not know the whereabouts of Iran’s stockpile of near-bomb-grade uranium
NYT reports that it is growing evidence that the Iranians, before the US attacks, had removed "400 kilograms, or roughly 880 pounds, of uranium enriched to 60 percent purity".
That is just below the 90 percent that is usually used in nuclear weapons.
https://x.com/Osinttechnical/status/1936920529979707402
>>508394559 (OP)I have it. Nobody will expect it here.
apua
md5: 85d01b7c66f0f2615a21a093f7436a50
🔍
>>508394559 (OP)They quickly rushed to the toilet and flushed it down.
>>508394559 (OP)So what? 5 bombs worth? 60% nice, from 60 to 90 is 1 week to 10 days work.
How many days has the amount of 60% purity enriched uranium been at 400 kilograms, or roughly 880 pounds?
Three days? Four?
>>508394559 (OP)https://odysee.com/@Das_Syndikat:3/Aryan-man-defends-Europe-from-shitskin-invasion-5000-BC:5
>>508394559 (OP)Good thing the lads got all that tunnel warfare training a few years back
>>508394559 (OP)>near-bomb-grade uraniumyou guys are worse than jews
It is probably being loaded into rockets as we speak. Even if they are shot down, the radiated material lands all over Israel.
>>508394559 (OP)The only group this fear mongering actually works on is the boomers.
>>508395508Kek
A “dirty bomb” is one type of a “radiological dispersal device” (RDD) that combines a
conventional explosive, such as dynamite, with radioactive material that may disperse when the
device explodes. It is not the same as a nuclear weapon. If there are casualties, they will be
caused by the initial blast of the conventional explosive. The radioactive particles that are
scattered as a result of the explosion cause the "dirty" part. The explosives in such a bomb
would still be more dangerous than the radioactive material.
