>Israel-Iran war LIVE: Iran Parliament approves plan to block major shipping route as Tehran ignores Donald Trump's warning
https://www.gbnews.com/news/world/israel-iran-war-latest-donald-trump-benjamin-netanyahu

>REVEALED: How US took Iran completely by surprise as Pentagon shares secret plan
https://www.gbnews.com/news/world/revealed-how-us-took-iran-completely-by-surprise-as-pentagon-shares-secret-plan

>Three football fans dead and at least 70 injured in Algeria in stadium disaster
https://www.gbnews.com/sport/football/three-dead-algeria-stadium-disaster-2672413445

>>508410123
>gender has almost everything to do with sex and non binary is often used as an answer to the question "are you a man or a woman?"
gender and gender identity are two separate things
gender identity is based on gender but is not gender itself
gender is based on your biological sex, gender identity is based on personality traits that overlap your gendered traits. some personality traits can overrule your gendered traits that naturally manifest from your gender and sex
its a tri-fold dynamic. fundamentally rooted in biology but as you move up the ladder it becomes more about psychology, which is more complex and nuanced
>tbf it is not that confusing but it is pointless and redundant.
well yeah, to you it will be because its not relevent to you
>are you a man or a woman?
sex = male
gender = man
gender identity = non-binary
sex = biology
gender = traits based on sex
gender identity = personality traits overlapping with gendered traits but not stemming solely from them and sometimes stemming from things in counter to them

>he wants to write gay content for children to read

>>508410957
alright this completely different to the way the last person described it to me, a tranny no less,
and you've made it way more complicated than they did, Seems like you're singing from a completely different hymn sheet, but then again that is to be expected of something so recently made up, there's nothing concrete about it. Ironic considering the subject.
>well yeah, to you it will be because its not relevent to you
of course it's relevant to me, why would it not be? I am also a human being just like you.
what's useless about it, as I described earlier, is that everyone accepted the fem/masc balance in people before this terminology sprouted from no where. "she's a girly girl, he's a mans man, she's a tomboy, he's in touch with his feminine side" etc.

>>508412613
>alright this completely different to the way the last person described it to me, a tranny no less,
>and you've made it way more complicated than they did, Seems like you're singing from a completely different hymn sheet, but then again that is to be expected of something so recently made up, there's nothing concrete about it. Ironic considering the subject.
no the issue with trannies is that they're not balanced. they're in active denial of their natural inclinations and polarise in the opposite direction then come back around (ironically)
thats why their view on it is simplified too
they have no conviction, they don't understand their own minds, they don't understand their own positions. because they're running from themselves
thats the core difference
I've embraced and accepted myself inside and out
trannies don't
transgenderism is the complete opposite dynamic of what I'm describing
what I'm talking about is spiritual, and what they do is take that spiritual dynamic, flip it on its head and make it worldly and physical and all about ego. hence why it becomes dysfunction and imbalance instead of function and balance
>what's useless about it, as I described earlier, is that everyone accepted the fem/masc balance in people before this terminology sprouted from no where. "she's a girly girl, he's a mans man, she's a tomboy, he's in touch with his feminine side" etc.
>idealism over reality
>if people did this or that it would be different
yes I agree but as mentioned above you're basically dismissing reality for the sake of idealism
when idealism is only practical when you acknowledge reality of things
ideally everyone would take this approach and be balanced
but in reality most people won't and it will always be that way

>>508412613
>>508413147
so yes, in your ideal world where everyone had achieved balance in gender dynamics internally it would be a useless term
but right now where only a minority have and ever will its not useless at all. you need to be able to differentiate
especially considering how I just showed you the two polar opposites of this dynamic too
how transgenders are not what they claim to be. they claim to be embracing one thing but are in fact running from something else which is a completely different dynamic. same with most non-binaries too

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B34WgDI718
he's so provocative and cringe I just can't stop watching this shite.

>>508413314
that wog's pretty cute ngl

>fatty slaphead still talking to himself
Any day now

Only a bert/pol/ namefag would continuously post here during a stint in rehab

brb avin a baff

>>508413147
>ideally everyone would take this approach and be balanced
sure I encourage people to do that myself, I don't disagree with what you're describing, but I think it's a flawed way to go about it. You've hijacked terminology originating from trans people and are now using it for your own purposes.
a person who describes themselves as non-binary is all over the places and expects you to treat them differently based on the mood they woke up that morning.
>dismissing reality for the sake of idealism
I don't think I am
>>508413198
no, the problem is it's counter intuitive, niche and requires too much explanation. What do you think people think when you describe yourself as non-binary? because in most cases you'll be filed as - tranny.
this concept never used to be a problem until all the trans language showed up.
Buddhists deal with this stuff very well.