How is legacy media still alive? How can anybody still believe their bullshit?

>>508461865 (OP)
Legacy media was reigning king until less than 2 decades ago. It hasn't been that long.

>>508461865 (OP)
That's wolf blitzer

>>508461865 (OP)
It's subsidized by billionaires who value their grasp on public discourse more than they value a few hundred million here and there.

Every guest they have on is pro israel for the first few days, especially prime time.
Beyond softball interviews, they don't push back at all they just let them spew blantaly false propaganda.
When they have a democrat or mid east "expert" come on to provide counter point they are always jewish.

Wolf Blitzer takes cover in Israel
https://youtu.be/YOulrBXgmfU
https://youtu.be/Atd-vVc_gpI

>As the interview was wrapping up, Bakart asked Blitzer, who's been in the region for nearly two weeks, if he feels safe.
>"I feel very secure," Blitzer said.
>"You want to make sure that's on television?" Bloomberg quipped.

https://youtu.be/fThNQyCDkLo

>>508461865 (OP)
>How is legacy media still alive?
Comcast makes it cheaper to buy a cable+internet package than to just buy internet alone, basically the charge you extra if you just want internet without cable.

>>508461865 (OP)
boomers

>>508461865 (OP)
the advantages of exploiting the legitimacy of soverignty to sidestep the spirit of the law

>>508461865 (OP)
Look at /pol/ and you have your answer, the ones who were to defeat them have turned into the same and worse.

99% of people are NPC's

I never listened to this shit...

>>508461865 (OP)
the same people who own internet media publications also own legacy media, they need to preserve their presence within television, radio, the internet and newspapers in order to ensure for control of political narratives.

the most recent adaptation that our media owners have made is to purchase prominent influences in online spaces like tiktok and instagram because young minds will only follow trends set by other young people - they will ignore or be revolted by trends send by people who are older than themselves.

>>508462464
Yeah, he's a hardcore zionist pretending to be a neutral talking head.

>>508461865 (OP)
There are no alternatives allowed.

Look what happened to Anglin and the Daily Stormer, if they're willing to do that to some irrelevant schizo imagine what they'd do to a normal opposition media

>>508461865 (OP)
80 to 90% are so fucking stupid that they got an experimental gene therapy, why wouldn't they believe legacy media?

yeah we should get our news from twitter faggots instead

so much better amirite