>>508465048 (OP)I think the difference here is that, when you look at all the other nations with nuclear warheads, they all communicate in no uncertain terms that they have these as a deterrent and would only use one as a last resort where their existence is threatened.
Iran has communicated in no uncertain terms that they are developing nuclear weapons strictly as a first-resort aggression tactic and that they will immediately use the weapon to kill their neighbors as soon as possible. They are unconcerned with their own possible destruction because they think if they die then they will just go to Heaven. Their country is full of empty palaces meant for the Messiah.
France has nuclear weapons. Britain has nuclear weapons. You don't see France making cringe AI videos every day showing them using these weapons to kill everyone that disagrees with them. Russians aren't in the street chanting "DEATH TO POLAND" every single day. India isn't going around building palaces to home the Messiah for their battle at Armageddon.
I think it would be a different situation if Iran was more normalized. If it had a disposition more akin to Turkey or Greece I doubt they would get the same kind of opposition.
You can hate me but it doesn't make me less correct.