It makes no sense if you have watched building demolition fails. It's very hard to demolish buildings properly.

An airplane perfectly demolishing a building is like shooting your car to unscrew the oil filter.

>>508537093
Yup that is exactly what would happen if a plane hit the side of a building.

>>508536801 (OP)
reminder the planes literally went THROUGH the building before they exploded

reminder the sprinkler systems were turned OFF for all 3 buildings.

>>508536801 (OP)
Il est incontestable : la machination sous-jacente à cet événement s’est avérée sans équivoque le fruit d’une conspiration. Urban Moving Systems porte une responsabilité directe pour l’implantation des charges explosives dans les bâtiments, hélas, affectés. La conséquence, d'un caractère particulièrement glaçant, a précisément réalisé les objectifs de cette organisation furtive : la constitution d’une machine impériale américaine, troublante dans son caractère, et dominée par une figure, désignée sous le nom de Sion, reposant sur sa colonne vertébrale. Exprimer une légère déception face à un résultat aussi profondément troublant et délibérément conçu serait manifestement insuffisant; il s’agit d’une catastrope d’appréciation et d'une insulte flagrante à la raison et à l'ordre établi.

why do american buildings collapse so easily

>>508538060
Those details aren't important.
Towers 1&2 aren't even important.
Tower 7 is the one that matters.

The problem is that people would rather double down than admit to being wrong or fooled. Don't overload them.

>>508538060
How does a crash from one side of the building destroy all columns evenly?

>>508536801 (OP)
The Mafia cheaped out on steel and concrete. No big mystery.

>>508539381
You want the good goy answer? It dropped down the elevator shaft and heated it evenly.
Yes, this is the official explanation.

>>508539458
Can't tell if serious.
That wouldn't make it burn evenly, but it's better than the official story.

>>508537093
They should have just used jet fuel.

>>508536801 (OP)
anon, most people are stupid, I think we got passed that when covid hit and it was clear that most people are just morons.
Which is why I don't believe in democracy

>>508537093
I love these.

>>508540065
It's pointless to say people are stupid when there is a conspiracy to lie about every fact of information across every media site.

>>508540040
hahahahahahaha

>>508539278
>why
asbestos

>>508540065
The covid paradox: when the people are so stupid for not seeing how the elites are trying to kill them you start to want the elites to hurry up and kill them.

>>508539301
>Don't overload them.
If ANYONE got the full dose all at once, they'd lose their minds. Most of these people will cry when it finally trickles down that it was israel and the US government who did 9/11. Willful ignorance.

>>508540213
Are you the same faggot who attacked me in the last thread because I asked for clarification and you couldn't define the words you use?

>>508536801 (OP)
And this doesn't even get into a "plane" crashing into the Pentagon at ground level and conveniently destroying the offices that were being used to audit the Pentagon, which announced it had $2.1 trillion unaccounted for the day before the "attack"

>>508540213
I remember the reports making no sense at the time. They said that they were going to give up and let building 7 go. Everyone was in shock so no one questioned it.

>>508540065
>Which is why I don't believe in democracy
democracy is fine when the media is unbiased.

>>508536801 (OP)
>>508537093

9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g

>>508539562
That makes all three the first three steel buildings in history to fall from fire.

>>508540423
That's when you say
>"Wait until you figure out the holocaust was fake!"

And when they start to recover, hit them with the moon landing.

>>508540423
Or that the Taliban banned opium production, which the CIA was buying to sell to American citizens, to fund illegal black budget projects.

>>508540718
Moon landing was real. The fake part is all the UFOs they saw, which is why they destroyed the high quality color tapes.

>>508540699
checked, this.

>>508536801 (OP)
events that sort of defy logic and don't hold up to scrutiny by intelligent people can be paradoxically MORE effective at affecting a population through demoralization. when presented with contradictions about these events the middlebrow brain has two options: 1) accept there are powerful factions deceiving the population on a massive scale and the mainstream narrative is a carefully constructed illusion or 2) simply stop thinking about it and accept the narrative at face value

>>508540577
>let building 7 go
PULL IT

>>508540718
Hahaha. I've converted two people so far. Some others were already close, but one of the converts was a pro-vaxx raging Karen bent on hatred for racism and a love of Israel. She's lady Hitler now. I'm so proud.

The down side to not overwhelming them is that they need to see that the facts are OVERWHELMING! This isn't ten conspiracy nuts spreading disinformation. These are professionals who saw a travesty and couldn't stay quiet about the lies.

>>508540887
Well the footage is fake. My per together l theory is that the 3 guys who died in the training accident actually went and their bodies are still up there. They got fried by the Van Allen radiation so NASA burned and buried 3 whinos to cover it up. This is what they don't want you to see and why the site has to be a no fly zone.

>>508540887
Hey, how about the flowing molten metal that was reported by dozens of first responders? "The jet fuel WEAKENED the steel!" Well, it apparently turned it into a liquid. How about the fact that the official report includes zero eyewitness accounts of the explosions heard in audio recordings that day?

>>508541194
I'd believe it. The crew was silent on their public debrief either because they knew they didn't go up, or they saw tons of aliens.
>>508541221
There was also the firefighter for building 7 that walked in a little late, got a phone call that they were "blowing the building" and to get out.

>>508537093
use jet fuel it causes pic related.

>>508541341
I recall seeing footage of firefighters running and telling everyone to get back before one of the towers fell, too, yelling"get back! Run! It's coming down - like a minute before it happened.

>>508540966
It's so bad, an entire nation of battered spouses in denial.
The biggest con was getting people to think of sorts fandom as acceptable masculinity and being knowledgeable as grounds for ostracization.
>REAL MEN DON'T KNOW PHYSICS, HISTORY, AND CURRENT EVENTS! NOW GO OBSESS ABOUT YOUNG MEN IN TIGHT PANTS AND STOP BEING A FAGGOT!

>>508541452
I like you can even see the central structure collapsing slightly faster, because they ran the charge order to start on the inside.

>>508539903
stay stupid
moron
how long till u die of clot shot, shitbag

>>508540926
That piece of shit needs to die.

>>508536801 (OP)
people think what the TV tells them to think

>>508540915
3) worldwide revolution, all elites impaled on pikes and left to die in misery that can't possibly equal their greed. They'd need lifetimes of suffering to repay what they've caused, but they'll get that in hell, if it's real.

>>508541729
I've got such a surprising feeling that this piece of shit will outlive us both

>>508541696
It makes me sick, too. And the participants just accept it. That's only one small example, of course. Everything you see, provided it's been monetized, is a distraction from reality masquerading as reality intended to make you feel fulfilled knowing and doing nothing useful.

>>508540718
Well-poisoning retard, there are conclusive shots of the moon landing that absolutely could not be faked, things like the zero-g dust floating around and the continuous shots of lifting off from the surface of the moon and going all the way into space. There was some definite fuckery about the moon missions, and Kubrick did admit to filming fake footage just in case something happened to the real mission, but we definitely went there. Any asshole can still see shit on the moon at the exact spots today with a strong enough telescope. Stop with your flat-Earth bullshit, you make the rest of us look fucking retarded.

>>508541811
This is a bit off topic, but I figured that this is why the bongs were so scared of the daleks in Dr Who but they look ridiculous to Americans. It's because their heads are tank turrets and they were all traumatized by the newsreels where the scary German or later Russian tank turns it's barrel towards the camera.
The screen programs our fears and our expectations.

>>508542009
He's 96 years old. He already got away with it. Unless he's found and tortured to death, we have to rely on hell to do the job, and I'm not confident such a place exists.

>>508540558
or wtc7 where the SEC was compileing the evidence of insider trading the days before the wtc attack, which was destroyed and it's unknown who was shorting all the airplane companies for some reason.

>>508542251
The state can always seize the assets of his foundation/trust/family since the money is the proceeds from criminal activity. Insurance fraud is a crime, and no new laws are needed.

>>508536801 (OP)
No evidence of explosives being used

>>508542365
Guaranteed most of his wealth is hidden, and his family would escape to israel.

>>508536801 (OP)
>strawman
The plane went all the way through the building. Not all the supports needed to fail at once. Obviously that last remaining supports preventing catastrophic failure failed, and then catastrophic failure occurred and the whole thing collapsed. BTW, they didn't fall neatly.

>>508542172
Watch this then come back and apologize.
https://youtu.be/KpuKu3F0BvY?si=hfg_9jaZA8G4gnlO
He calls out flat earth in the first fucking frame. The footage is absolutely fake.

That same channel has a 3 part 911doc that's really good.

>>508542427
TONS of evidence for thermite.

>>508542172
>the footage is real
>flat earth
based anti moon landing black propagandist

>>508542507
You really think it's an all-or-nothing scenario, don't you? The ONLY way all three buildings could fall directly into their own footprints is controlled demolition. A single undamaged beam would cause all three of the structures to topple to the side.

>>508539381
>destroy all columns evenly?
It's not necessary for all columns to have been destroyed evenly by the plane and fire. There was enough structural damage that the whole thing failed.

>>508542427
>No evidence
Eyewitness testimony, molton steel days after the event, material ejected from the windows before the collapse.
Why are you lying?

>>508542172
flat earthers only do it to annoy people
no one can be that stupid

>>508536801 (OP)
9/11 is the issue that made me realize that rational debate doesn't actually work on most people. If you watch building 7 collapse and can't solve this puzzle then there's really no hope for you.

>>508542499
>hidden
Not to the government. They know exactly where it went, even if it went out of the country. They can also put leins on his foundations and organizations. It's simply the government refusing to enforce the law.
>>508542724
Not how it works. Any partial failure would set the building falling sideways. Watch a documentary on building demolition. It is an extremely precise science.

>>508537093
This is something Ive tried explaining to people who don't understand physics. Buildings resist their own collapse. That's why demolitions require multiple timed explosions at key structural points. All the strength that keeps a building standing in the first place also slows down its collapse, which in real world leads to tipping. Newtons Third Law.
The idea the towers collapsed into their own footprint because of some failure at the top is retarded.

>>508542724
Are you stupid or a liar? If they are uneven the building doesn't fall straight. Stop.

>>508539278

>>508542751
Don't forget that the wreckage was till 1200 degrees Fahrenheit a month later. Slower continuing thermite reaction would do that.

Have we considered that maybe they control demolition it to avoid it from falling sideways into other buildings, doing so after the plane hit and was already bringing it down

>>508541633
That wouldn't confirm anything wouldn't be hard to see that the building was about to come down

>>508542716
No, you think it's an all or nothing scenario. They didn't fall directly into their footprints. A single undamaged beam can't provide a pivot for the building to rotate.

>>508542751
All debunkable

>>508542869
The rich own the government, have since the beginning. John Hancock was a smuggler crimelord. This country has been astroturfed from day one.

>>508542869
You have a lot of faith in the government. What if he bought gold with it from his friends after converting it to cash and taking a private yacht to Israel? Also, this was decades ago, before widespread computerization. I worked at a dealership; we still used paper work orders and hand wrote everything.

>>508542224
it does. and soon, most humans will be AI-generated this way. what a world that will be!

>>508536801 (OP)
Hundreds of fire fighters, police and FBI died of related deceases because of 911. The same zogbots that support the system would be sacrificed.

>>508543090
Correct. Jews organized the French Revolution through the Freemasons and Jesuits, then founded America. It was supposed to be the original Israel, but their plan failed. The American Civil War was ran by Freemasons/Jesuits in the south to attempt to get the US to rejoin the UK, but it failed.

>>508543112
It's possible to track. It's called investigation. Nothing is completely hidden.

>>508543015
That's just a word you're using. You said there's is no evidence and there is. You're already wrong. Please stop and if you're a paid shill, kill your boss. Right now. Go stab him in the neck with a pencil until he stops moving.

>>508542869
>Not how it works. Any partial failure would set the building falling sideways. Watch a documentary on building demolition. It is an extremely precise science.
It depends on the load distribution, but once enough of the structure fails then the whole thing falls down. Partial structural support isn't enough to make the building rotate. The entire weight of the building is going straight down. Maybe you have unbalanced explosives that tilt the building, then gravity does the rest, but if the building hasn't tilted then it's going to fall directly straight down.

>>508543282
Your chronology is backwards.

>>508542927
Do you remember it?
1. no steel buildings in history had ever fallen from fire, and both towers were engineered to take multiple impacts from the biggest domestic passenger plane at the time, a 707, fully fueled. It showed 0 signs of coming down, and the expectation wasn't there. There were still firefighters inside. He ran telling people to get away because they told him they were going to pull the building. A controlled demolition takes a team of experts, tons of gear, wiring and the actual explosives themselves, which was thermite this time, not explosive, though some charges were used, as they were recorded being set off in sequence on video tapes. Controlled demolition could not have been a last-minute decision.

>>508543012
We're at an impasse, because I'm intelligent enough to understand this stuff, and you're just a retarded Bruce who knows nothing. Good bye. I don't have patience for you. You're talking to the fucking 9/11 encyclopedia, and you're an ignorant little kid who can't grasp physics.

>>508543350
>once enough of the structure fails then the whole thing falls down
Then you should tell this building to behave. Kind of a counterexample to your absurd claim. I'd say make a static forces diagram, but we all know you're arguing disingenuously
>>508537093

>>508543350
>once enough of the structure fails then the whole thing falls down
Sure, and it will look like >>508537093 Watch a documentary on building demolition. An airplane perfectly demolishing a building is like sharpshooting an oil filter off a car, or using a sledgehammer to remove someone's braces (without injury.)

>>508543410
You're right. Still the same players and people doing the same thing.

>>508543350
>it's going to fall directly straight down.
Until it hits the rest of the building under it, of course.

>>508543012
>They didn't fall directly into their footprints.
100% they did.

>>508543015
You're wearing a little hat right now, aren't you?

>>508543012
Yes a single undamaged beam would cause a pivot point. Low speed pivots amplify as the collapse continues throughout time. That's why timing of explosives is so critical in demolition.

Look at building 7. >>508541452 You can literally see the interior parts collapse sooner due to explosive timing, because that's proper building demolition methodology.

>>508543282
When someone takes cash and doesn "something" with it out of view of everyone, there isn't enough investigation on earth to discover it unless he wanted it to be discovered. I'm not sure you understand the power that piece of shit has.

>>508543350
Here you are spouting your dumb fuck theory again. "If enough of the structure is damaged, the rest gives up and falls as if it wasn't even there. My mom told me."

>>508536801 (OP)
That;s not even half of it
>The plane that crashed on the Pentagon was obliterated to nothing, leaving a tiny hole
>no footage of said plane, lmao
>they stopped bringing dogs that find explosives about a week before the attacks for no reason
>they found one of the hijackers because his passport fell into the streets below, yet no blackbox survived
>you can clearly see in videos molten metal fall from the tower
And there is countless more.

>>508536801 (OP)
If the 9/11 conspiracy includes a real plane doing very real damage to a building, why would explosive charges be necessary to "even it out"

Would the destruction of a domino tripped building be insufficiently impressive or leave too many witnesses?

>>508536801 (OP)
You can look at buildings actually hit by real drones and aircraft and missiles...

They don't collapse like the twin towers.

>>508544232
-sigh-
The twin towers were EACH designed to take MULTIPLE impacts from the biggest domestic passenger jet at the time, which was the 707, fully fueled.

>>508536801 (OP)
The "what would actually happen" is the official story, that's what actually happened

>>508544232
Because the towers were actually designed to be able to withstand large commercial aircraft smashing into them.

>>508544582
The towers were designed to withstand the impact if large aircraft which they did pretty well. The subsequent fire was not adequately prepared for

>>508544915
That's retarded, of course they could. Do you think the engineers didn't think of the fuel burning? That the plane would magically teleport into the building with empty tanks?

>>508544224
The passport being found in rubble really insults my intelligence how could anyone believe that was possible? How is that explained

>>508545150
Yeah it was pretty retarded. They did not adequately model the effects of a jet fuel fire and missed the fact that their impact resistant design actually made the towers MORE vulnerable to collapse from fire

>>508542905
>reddit doge meme that assumes the jewish narrative is correct

>>508545271
No explanation, some paper survived the ordeal but blackboxes, some of the most resilient shit ever created did not.

>>508545474
stop replying me until you get more than 2 braincells rubbing together

>>508544915
You mean despite the main structure being coated with asbestos still? Yeah, it was coated with a few inches of fire retardant/heat retardant asbestos coating. It was part of the reason why the building was such a pariah. One of them. We won't get into the leaking foundation.

>>508545640
Cry more nigger, your fantasy doesnt make sense and never did. Even if it was a false flag the planes knocked down the towers

>>508545640
They should make black boxes out of old passports.

>>508536801 (OP)
Your misunderstanding comes from not knowing the design features which made the twin towers unlike other buildings.

The old buildings (including the empire state building which had a plane hit it in 1945) were built using the steel frame method; where each floor is a series of interconnected boxes.

One of features advertised with the twin towers was their open floor design, which added millions of square feet of floor space; and was achieved by moving much of the support members to the outside walls.

Meanwhile, the method of construction of the wall sections used a series of sections which were welded together; with the floors attached via the industrial version of an L bracket.

Unlike the 1945 accident, when the jet hit, it knocked out such a large percent of the outside walls (especially at a corner), that it caused the floors above to first tilt, and then snap off (just like your image says should have happened.

As for the reason it collapsed... here we go back to the design difference. As the weight of the top floors started to fall, it hit each floor blowing out the brackets which attached both the floor and the wall sections.

The net effect (and if you look closely in slow motion you will see), that the building didn't collapse like a traditional building, but peeled like a banana

>>508545675
Yes, it was nowhere near enough to resist a jet fuel fire combined with the structural design and damage

>>508545474
You must be trolling. No one is this stupid. You are on another level. Did your mom bring you in for extra vaccines when you were a kid? Maybe you grew up in a house with lead paint, which tasted good? Maybe a childhood bout with syphilis of the brain?

>>508545934
Nope, you're too stupid. I'm going to bed. I pity you. When you finally wake up to reality, don't commit suicide; a lot of people are stupid. It's not just you.

>>508545973
I'm sorry reality is not as satisfying as your fantasies, but in real life this kind of oversight is common as fuck, especially when there is a financial incentive not to notice something

I can't remember the full story, but Richard Feynman was curiously playing around with a type of plasmoid device, basically another one of those over unity machines and it disintegrated metals like aluminum and steel.

I think a similar type of device was used on the towers.

>>508545818
why then did it turn to dust as it fell?

>>508545934
How was the passport retrieved iyo. Thrown from the plane? Or was that part planted but the building falling was legit

>>508546381
No idea. I can believe it was planted

If it wasn't done by terrorists then how do you explain the terrorist passports they found in the rubble? Dumbass conspiratard.

>>508546252
It didn't turn to dust. Meanwhile, if you look at the damage, you can see what I was talking about, in regards to the peeling.

>>508536801 (OP)
Boomers aren't people

>>508545818
And it's just a coincidence that both collapses happened to look exactly like controlled demolitions. And that Larry Silverstein didn't show up to the WTC that day. And Tower 7? Just very poorly built, I guess, seeing as how "debris" caused it to collapse

>>508546252
That's something most people don't realize. Scalar wave weaponry. Nikola Tesla invented it. The CIA admits this. They used scalar inferometers to vaporize it as it fell.
Scalar wave inferometers are also what cause havana syndrome. Using it to listen to peoples' thoughts or inject thoughts, but it was too high a power level. Inception is soft disclosure of their technical ability, and also how mkultra generally works (convince people to want to do what you want done.) They blame microwaves because it's publicly disclosed technology.

You don't think all this AI tech is cutting edge, do you? It's decades old. Old Julian Assange video interviews on par with Veo3 show signs of AI generation, from early 2010s...

>>508546523
I'm willing to believe Bush gov would plant so.ething like that in order to quickly direct attention to someone to pin the tragedy on. Far as the building going down I'm skeptical but not really sure which side I stand on but there's s lot of fishy details.

>>508546645
Neither looked like controlled demolition. Both very obviously begin above the impact point, neither falls at free fall speed and neither collapses neatly into its footprint

Imagine still being a Truther in 2025.

>>508546645
> it's a coincidence that people who demolish buildings take advantage of the same physical forces that happens when a building collapses due to damage.

Also, if you watch this video, you can also see what I was talking about with it peeling. When the top portion snaps off; it slaps into each floor, one at a time, snapping off the side members, which detaches the floor, causing it to also continue down to the next floor. And because the top floors weighed so much, the weight along (verses inertia) was enough to cause a cascade failure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eI6bAjbLtsU

>>508546877
A better video showing the peeling effect:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-762hehbTEU

>>508544528
>>508544582
Why didn't the dumbies who set the charges make then cause inconsistent damage to make the top fall over and not look like a controlled demolition?

>>508546790
Imagine believing the government in 2025

>>508546766
I can believe it was a flash flag or allowed to go ahead or whatever mich much easier than I can believe it was a controlled demolition because it looks so mich like an uncontrolled collapse. Actual planes clearly did actually hit the buildings so why even bother with the whole concept of ALSO precisely setting up a controlled demolition to look like an accidental collapse, and somehow getting your explosives and timing mechanism to survive being hit by a plane

>>508546935
The same reason the Titanic didn't sink. The older Olympic is what sunk. The Titanic was sold to Europe. (((money)))

>>508546935
jews and our government have very little respect for the intelligence of the average citizen. And they just call everyone who questions them "conspiracy theorists" and think that'll end the conversation

>>508546935
Because if even one of those buildings were to fall sideways in the middle of Manhattan the levels of destruction would be beyond imagination.

>>508546935
The top does fall over and the collapse does not look controlled, so if it was planned they DID do that

>>508547139
What's a Jew doing in New Zealand? Shouldn't you be going back to Israel to help defend your country?

>>508547084
Yes. They think if they repeat the official narrative enough it we'll all believe it. But once you see through one of their false flags you can see through all of them much easier.

>>508547267
Have you ever even watched a video of the collapses? Go and look

>>508543638

Do we know what Larry Silverstein did with his insurance payout? Has he done anything with it overtly?

>>508536801 (OP)
hey
how much would it cost to rebuild a exact 1:1 replica of the oldschool wtc and also buy one of the planes that flew into the building, rig the plane to become a unmanned drone ( airforce did this in the 1950s already btw ) and fly the plane into the wtc replica exactly like on 9/11
just for the lulz at a safe location without any humans being harmed of course

>>508539301
Tower 1 and 2 was a masterfully created operation, that was before the competency crisis.
7 was always a fuck up. They could only get away with it thanks to the first two. The same goes for the Pentagon, that was a lousy stuff.

>>508548538
If we take the price of each tower and adjust for inflation, it would be around 3.5 billion per tower which is about as much as the new Freedom Tower cost(4 billion), perhaps another billion of the rigged plane? So about 8+b I would wager.

>>508547742
It all went into building the new world trade center and didn't even come close to paying for it all

>>508547742
Don't listen to the retarded kiwi, he has payed exactly 0 bucks for One World Trade Center. He payed for WTC 2,3,4 and 7.

>>508537376
werent the towers designed to fall vertically in case of attack?

Wtc7 still makes no sense to me

>>508539381
theres a couple of vids where you can see frame by frame how its a specific side that gives in first, so the top part actually is inclined. The sustain at the broken floors fold inwards, like bending inwards, and then the inclined top part of the building seem to put so much weight on the weakened bars that it starts collapsing the floors bellow one by one

>>508537093
Listen you don't understand. It would have cost like $500,000 a floor to get all of the asbestos out of each of those buildings and you have to realize that's a lot of money. Also, the actual ground zero was worth more without the buildings on it and it was also very expensive to heat it in the winter and to cool it in the summer because of its size. Also it was made to withstand an attack like that. Yeah we know but like that's pretty much the point. You don't need to go into it deeper than that

The engineers themselves made it so that it could handle that kind of an attack. They even said this much

at the very beginning of thid vid you can clearly see how the top gets inclined
https://youtu.be/qhyu-fZ2nRA?si=V-aSVvEh5mr9o8ns

this man single-handedly fucked your conspiracy bussies up

>>508536801 (OP)
Americans had their own gov kill thousands in 9/11 false flag and Americans even though fully armed are not doing violent revolution against them

>>508550186
>yeah bro, the low oxygen fire burning in the open reaches temps to weaken all the steel beams and frames at the same time
There is a reason he disabled comments. Just remember guys: No other steel framed high rise building has ever completely collapsed due to fire before or since 9/11.

>>508550186
>makes the same argument that heated steel has less tensile strength than cold steel
Good job bro, you ignored the fact that it takes a controlled demolition to make a building collapse into its own footprint.

I want to see him make a building out of 4 steel rods with a big block of concrete on top. Then make the biggest fire/blowtortch he can and get it to fall straight down.

>>508537093
Both of these are collapsing from the bottom failure not from the top falling down on it.

The obvious demolition of WTC 7 is the most damning thing. But there were plenty of other fishy things. Like the attack on the pentagon that looked way more like a missile

>>508550689
Yeah. Those two are the ones I really find strange :/

>>508550689
There is some choppy video footage. No plane was in the video. It was a cruise missile. You would expect the strike site to look like a junkfield with ground beef everywhere.

>>508536801 (OP)
Naw the FBI tried blowing it up with bombs in the 90s, it turns out the WTC was built all retarded and all the structural elements were in the walls, so the feds needed to try another approach. Bombs just blew out a few floors and failed to cause it to collapse.

>>508550689
Yeap, you'd also have to believe that not only did the plane vaporize to nothing, or that the freaking pentagon has no clear footage of the event, but that the pilot of the plane, who was known for not being able to fly for shit somehow did an aerial maneuver that even the most experienced pilots wouldn't be able to do with certainty.

>>508550454
>>508550467
kek
niggerbrains get assblasted
u both have aids and suck dirty ass

>>508540597
but the the media is biased so whats your point retard
god what a stupid post

>>508537093
This is what happens when you don't use "Urban Movers" to do you demo's kek

>>508536801 (OP)
jet fuel can't melt steel beams

Wasn’t Bin Laden supposedly in a cave during 911, when he held up a finger just before tower one was hit, or was it before it collapsed? He repeated the gesture, holding up two fingers just before the second plan… I could have sworn I remember that, but ChatGPT is saying that never happened.

Wait, it was before it was hit… he claimed that he was in fact surprided the buildings collapsed. I wonder if he ever figured out that the buildings collapsed because of a little help from.mossad: they were his silent partner.

>>508539278
Jews

>>508540558
Leaving zero plane wreckage as well

>>508543644
Those buildings remained intact and tilted at the base, so they acted as giant levers with the fulcrum at the base. The twin towers failed near the top or near the middle, so only the upper fragments would be tilting against the plane impact points. Only the upper fragment could have rotated (assuming it had enough structural integrity to rotate as one piece). But the impact site isn't a good fulcrum because the tower below the impact site has a small amount of flex. And the tower above the impact site was burnt all through by the fires of the jet fuel, so it wasn't acting as a solid lever.... the fires descended below the impact points too, due to the jet fuel leaking. Anyway, the floors pancaked and the towers broke apart. If you look at some videos, maybe the part above the impact did rotate slightly as it broke apart, but all the weight was pushing straight down on the tower below. Even if the upper fragment, which was breaking apart, had some torque, it wouldn't be enough to tilt the lower part of the tower. The whole thing just broke apart. Gravity points straight down and there was no lever action. Comparing to a building with a bungled demolition that tilts where it meets the ground (with the entire building intact, acting as a lever) is really disingenuous.

Neither fell straight down though. I definitely remember the part above the plane crash being at an odd angle. And a lot was spewing outwards as the thing collapsed, to the point of damaging other buildings. If it had been controlled it would fall all at once. It collapsed because it was of American design and American build quality.

>>508548538
You could just simulate it if you had access to the building plans, probably got destroyed in the terrorist attack too sadly.

>>508536801 (OP)
It's shit cheap 1970's construction.
I'm just surprised it didn't collapse sooner.
t. architect

>>508542251
>He's 96 years old
Goyim foreskins are quite rejuvenating it appears

>>508560764
if it is so cheap and shit, how did it have the ability to pulverize steel and concrete

>>508545818
>peeled like a banana
yumm