Which religion do the most generous people follow /pol/? And not generous to their church or pastor, I mean the downtrodden.

Jesuit Catholics

>>508552234 (OP)
Catholicism

>>508552368
>>508552404
No, the ACTUAL downtrodden, not the fakers.

>>508552234 (OP)
i am the downtrodden. one small step down and i'll be back to being a hobo again. all i'm asking for is some crumbs from the table.

>>508552234 (OP)
>DEUS VULT

>>508552484
Yeah, Catholicism

>>508552544
Ok. If /pol/ says so, but I have some deep misgivings

>>508552234 (OP)
feet

>>508552234 (OP)
A type of hybrid European Pagan Zoroastrianism with Woden as the allfather also known as Horo

>>508552618
>I have some deep misgivings
That's a (You) problem
Captcha: Y00

>>508552234 (OP)
>no weed smokers
fake pic

>>508552618
I got free food all the times from going to church. People there just love to share stuff.

>>508552830
I don't think you understand just how cheap food is compared to the wealth these people/orgs have.
You are picking up pennies in front of a steamroller if you make character judgement this lightly.

>>508552234 (OP)
A few years back, an old Norwegian lady got scammed out of her life savings, bank refused to reimburse and someone started a spleis (similar to gofundme)
A couple hundred thousand donors and not a single foreign name on the donor list so i think it`s safe to say it`s not muslims
At least not here

>>508552234 (OP)
How do I convert to the Nice Feet religion?

>>508552234 (OP)
depends on what we mean by generosity. is giving money generous if an unjust socio-economic system is the reason for one's homelessness? if the reason is due to mental ill health, does generosity take the form of listening, befriending and incorporating the person into our culture in a way that rehumanizes them? or does it mean slip them a sandwich? is the very idea of being generous to the homeless reinforcing a power dynamic that says "I'm ok, you're not, I give, you take" which only serves to eliminate dialogue and keep two human beings in seperate boxes from one another? Or am I talking like a fag and my shit's all retarded?

If you're just looking for denominational brownie points, my questions still matter. PC(USA) gets high ranks for trying to address the othering of the needy, Catholics get high ranks for material provisions, Sikhs get high ranks for feeding the hungry, Atheists get high ranks for trying to find new moral reasons to be kind and generous.

>>508553821
The bare minimum, and I think the point of religion, is to get all the freaks, retards and social rejects a fresh start in a productive environment where they can help others. Not just a traveling circus

>>508552234 (OP)
secular people (agnostic/atheists) vote for parties that strongly support social programs the most often, globally

>>508554088
That is the point of certain religions, for sure. To bring it to an even more fundamental definition, religion says people can and should change. Religions then say why they need to, how they can and what they get for doing so. The idea that people can change is the magic though, given how many (and, sadly, how many religious people) believe no one can change and human nature is set.

I make this distinction because there are always two forms of major religions: the prophetic form and the state form. The state form says there is an ideal narrative, an ideal citizen, and all the freaks who aren't that need to follow x religion to become the ideal. The prophetic form doesn't typically prescribe an ideal citizen of an earthly polity and is less concerned with shaming non-typical humans and more concerned with their spiritual/moral/whatever you choose to define the part of you that transcends' growth.

>>508552234 (OP)
Did someone drop an entire wallet into the "nice feet" bowl?

>>508554365
>giving away other people's money
>generous

>>508552234 (OP)

$100 for nice feet

>>508554365
I am sorry, are you somehow implying "vote for parties that strongly support social programs" is a good deed?
Outsourcing "social programs" to a faceless but self-perpetuating bureaucracy leads to the perverse dysgenic incentive structure that is now killing the west.
I.e. it becomes adaptive for losers to shit out as many children as possible to gibs-maxx, and your system additionally attracts free-loading immigrants like flies, while the people who uphold society become infertile because they have to pay for all the dysgenic spawn plus immigrants.

>>508554696
>free-loading immigrants like flies
Agreed. Whatever policy attracted this freeloading pedophile needs to be repealed.

>>508554365
>>508554633
>giving away other people's money
>generous
this, kek
it's like saying communists are generous for stealing money from gentiles and giving it to jews
generosity is also not kikes donating billions of stolen money from Whites to further jewish interests like push for multiculturalism in White countries and NGOs shipping shitskins and niggers to White countries

generosity is giving out money that you have earned with your own labor, or donating your own time and labor to help for example in a soup kitchen

>>508554822
I thought we were talking about "social programs"? I don't dispute that big players can be a danger too, but it's a different issue.
A raging elephant in your kitchen is a different problem than a termite infestation. Both are problems, but the elephant requires a targeted measure, while the termites require stochastic measures. Going after each individual termite with an elephant gun would be just as retarded as trying to spray insecticide on the elephant.

>>508552234 (OP)
Nice feet bowl always gets a chuckle from me.