Why is consent such a difficult concept for right-wing men to understand? Why are you guys so blatantly pro-rape?

if i were to offer you money for sex or money but you don't have to have sex which would you "consent" to?

>>508575829 (OP)
It gives women all the power and men none of the power. A woman's whims override everything.

>>508575829 (OP)
So the half naked girls in movies didn’t consent?

Women are stupid and it’s pointless trying to squeeze any sense or non-hypocrisy from these solipsistic demons.

>>508575829 (OP)
What you will consent to reveals your worth. Women, it turns out, are worthless garbage if they are allowed to be.

>>508575829 (OP)
An absolutely horrific blackpill to swallow is that as much as you push back against women online, there will always be simps and "u go gurrrrrrrrl" nasty women who validate what they do. Just take away their rights, that is the only solution. Everything else is fluff.
>b-b-but maybe we can find ways to get guys to man up and let women stay the way they are
No. That's never going to happen, that is a tradcuck fantasy.

>>508575829 (OP)
>Why is consent such a difficult concept for right-wing men to understand?
Why is accountability so hard for women to understand?

>>508575829 (OP)
Then explain why these people were all forced to lose their jobs?

>>508575829 (OP)
ask the dumb cunt to define consent and why a regular woman who dresses like a whore is somehow not consenting to being looked at and sexualized.

>>508575829 (OP)
Whoring is to women what fighting is to men

>>508575829 (OP)
>studio porn
>revenge porn
>casting/audition porn
>rape porn
>stolen porn
OH MY GOD I'M GONNA GOOOOOOON

>porn made by the women themselves for which they rake in most of the profits
gentlemen, we need to have a serious discussion regarding the proliferation of adult-materials on the internet. the trend of monetizing female sexuality is a plague upon our society and it needs to be eradicated. it is ruining an entire generation of men and women alike

>>508575829 (OP)
>say it with me now: consent,
>c-o-n-
can you form an argument instead of just using buzzwords?
I have no idea what you're saying or how that word even applies to what he said

>>508575829 (OP)
w-h-o-r-e

>>508575829 (OP)
Men want control and it bothers them that they don't have it hence the constant seething kek

>>508577630
Western society fucked up when it yielded to women on the violence question.
Violence should not be your first choice, but it sure is a good second choice. There is no point in trying to talk something out with someone who is genuinely retarded or arguing in bad faith. If you adhere to the "no violence" rule in a situation like that, you already lost by default.

>>508575829 (OP)

Say paid for Prostitution. It should be criminal. Prostitution is in America

>>508577686
That's also a men thing

>>508575829 (OP)
Woman have no problem giving consent of you give them money

>>508575829 (OP)
>a type 3 roastie

cringe

>>508575829 (OP)
>tranthony
Lol. Lmao even.

>>508575829 (OP)
Sex if paid for cannot be truly consented to. All prostitution and porn is rape.

>>508575829 (OP)
>>508576219
>>508576536
It's already known that right wingers are low in emotional intelligence, studies found.

>>508575829 (OP)
things were better when their immigrants vote left argument had merit

>>508577837
>can you form an argument instead of just using buzzwords?
They can't. Their whole strategy boils down to
>I will vaguely allude to something with positive connotations, and will word it in such a way that any further question about this will be interpreted as you being retarded as shit and not even able to understand the most basic things
You can make them spin free when you just ignore the implicit threat and ask them to clarify anyway. Because they cannot. They'll start spouting some incoherent shit and then just switch gears to personal attacks very quickly.

Women's strategy always has and always will be to just hand you the rope and hope that you hang yourself with it.

>>508577630
Wireless internet should just be fucking annihilated, too many cancerous cretins that invaded the internet since the invention of the iphone who don't deserve to be on here. The threshold to accessing anything online should be having to use a desktop computer and some convoluted process, just to fuck with normies and all these mentally ill faggots that drag down society.
>Muh rights
>Muh ebil normal people
>Muh opression
Its all appeal to emotion and false authority. You can't reason with women because about anything related to these issues because they're so thoroughly brainwashed.
My girlfriend actually still thinks that gays are such fun and trendy people, but if you confront them with the stats they'll be extremely disgusted, if you show them what happens with the "trans" people they'll actually get upset because the cognitive dissonance starts to kick in where they come up with cope excuses.

>>508578239
>emotional intelligence
>not logical intelligence
so leftists feel and right wingers think? Amazing if true

>>508578341
People should have the internet but it should be treadmill powered. So you can say what you wanted to say after the equivalent of a half hour power walk.

>>508577837
It’s funny that white knights and whores started throwing out the buzzword consent as if that just settles the argument even though it makes 0 sense when you really consider it. It seemed to start as the new way to explain why women were so dumb about wearing thong bikinis but got embarrassed about being seen in underwear. The old argument was swimwear uses thicker material that’s not quite as revealing, which was still pretty retarded but at least it was an actual form of explanation. Somewhere in the last couple years the new argument became simply “consent, duh!” When pressed on what this meant you’d see something along the lines of “of course an incel doesn’t get consent”. Like others have said it’s just another bullshit way for whores and simps to excuse women’s bullshit, and you will get absolutely nowhere trying to rationalize it or debate it.

>>508575829 (OP)
Then why are feminazis so anti-porn? How is a woman who supposedly has agency, who enters into a contract of her own free will and is paid for her work - thus consenting - exploited by it?
Either women have agency and are free to make their own decisions, or they don’t and need to have their rights removed for their own protection just like children.
It’s one of the other.

>>508575829 (OP)
>i consent for my pics and videos of my pussy and asshole to be plastered all over the internet
time has repeatedly and consistently proven that this consent is temporary and subject to regret decades later. women are fucking retarded thinking their 'consent' means anything in this world of 30 years late rape accusations and 'i made a lot of money having sex on camera but now that all the money is spent i'm going to sue for more'

>>508578341
>>Muh opression

Ugly men look at those pictures too. This is rape.

>>508575829 (OP)
shitlib women may understand consent, but they certainly don't understand manufacturing consent

>>508578020
>That's also a men thing
Feminized men maybe. Men accept responsibility. This is why women will never be equal to men. It's not in their nature.

>>508575829 (OP)
That's just a cope.
Feminists spewed rhetoric for the past six decades about women not being whores. Then OnlyFans is created, and women stampede to it to be whores.

Thus every chauvinist male who has ever said anything anti-woman has ended up being proven categorically right.

>>508578340
>You can make them spin free when you just ignore the implicit threat and ask them to clarify anyway. Because they cannot. They'll start spouting some incoherent shit and then just switch gears to personal attacks very quickly.
my stepmother was so quick to fall back on that shit. she hated me. i get a new car, my dad and sister rush out to look at it while i remain inside with my stepmother, silently thinking "it's just a car".
the next day my stepmom gives me a huge angry tirade in a text message about how awful i am for not 'inviting' her to look at my car.
i call her immediately and challenge her to describe what it looks and sounds like when i 'invite' someone to do that so i know how to do it in the future. she starts up with the swearing at me and such so i put her on speakerphone for the group of people i'm with and their laughter at her impotent whining followed by her silently hanging up out of utter embarassment is probably a big reason why she was so willing to change our relationship to 'no contact at all' when i decided that finally needed to happen

>>508579609
I should also mention: Nearly all women on OnlyFans don't get paid anything.

But they're still on there. Because they want the attention. And the money.

Something like 20% of zoomettes are on there. It's an astronomical number.

>>508577813
>which they rake in most of the profits
Lmao. Ban all porn and kill all porn profucers.

>>508577813
This is exactly and unironically my stance on the issue

>>508579834
based and correctpilled

>>508575829 (OP)
If consent really mattered to women they would not have voted to punish men for no longer consenting to relationships with their wives, they wouldn't vote to draft us into wars against our consent, they wouldn't vote to criminalize male behaviors or male sexuality without our consent, etc. Also all those school children who can't legally give consent wouldn't be getting molested by female school teachers.

In other words, women don't care about consent of men or boys, why should we give a damn about their consent?

>>508575829 (OP)
>imagine whoring yourself out for money, couldn't you just get a real job?
>I consent to being a whore
Whats your point here? That not getting paid for one night stands and shitty porn vids is rape? Is cleaning, cooking or factory work also rape?

>say it with me now: money
>M-o-n-e-y
They like being sexualized as long as it fills their bankaccount

>>508577813
>NOoooooooooooooo you don't have problem with the other kike kinds of porn only with onlyfans trust me
Kys cunt, ban ALL porn and kill all the kikes that own it.
>b-but how am I gonna construct my low IQ strawman
kys roasty

>>508577813
Yes, porn was a lot better and more tolerable for the rest of society when it was gatekept, classy, and we didn't have whores becoming millionaires then trying to shove their political beliefs down our throats as if we should take them seriously for anything other than being a glorified cumrag. Now we got bitches like Mia Khalifa speaking at universities convincing the next generation of women that they too can simultaneously be both empowered and victims through the one simple trick of prostituting themselves online and throwing out accusations when it suits them.

>>508575829 (OP)

>>508580722
>convincing the next generation of women that they too can simultaneously be both empowered and victims through the one simple trick
Personal accountability hates this!

>>508575829 (OP)
Did other women consent to having to live with walking hard-ons because their sisters want to jiggle their tits for easy money? Consent is just a way to dodge responsibility. I'm sick of living in a neoliberal hellscape where everything is tolerated as long as money exchanges hands and the government can take its cut. I have whore fatigue, bros.

>>508575829 (OP)
>tranthony bourdain
Tranny sisters, we eating good tonight!

>>508577813
Do you really want billionaire whores? Do you want young girls to aspire to be childless fuckholes because it pays? Stupid woman.

>>508575829 (OP)
This is just semantics. She's still saying exactly what the original screenshot said. Women are okay with being sexualized (i.e. they "consent" to it) when they're being paid, but they're not okay and do not consent when they aren't paid. It's the same thing - she just wants to throw in a feminist buzzword to try and make it sound like she has an actual argument when all she's really doing is playing semantics

>>508577630
Women do that because they know that the whore giving it away for the price of a hamburger online will never be competition for marriage with a high value man. Same reason the fat cunt will stop you asking out her hot friend. Women ALWAYS try and fuck with the competition.

>>508581288
Exactly. If women REALLY CARED about the problem of rape and consent, they'd consent to marry their looksmatch and give them pussy sometimes so that 9/10 dudes walking around don't become radicalized incels. Instead they all go to the same colleges, fuck the same dudes, get the same shitty tattoos and nose rings, then blame all men when Glocktavius dumps them for a new side chick.

>>508578167
it also cannot be truly consented to outside of marriage.

Anyways, i am not interested whether you would call it rape or not. It can be argued that rape is a better evolutionary strategy than consensual sex anyways.

>>508575829 (OP)
E-whores aren’t human.
Consent is a myth.

>>508583193
Women will say they are "sex-positive" and use words to describe sex such as "empowering" or "liberating" and then in the next sentence complain about rape and consent. If women were really sex-positive and really felt empowered and liberated by sex, they would want more men to be rapists. By complaining about rape they are really admitting they're not sex-positive, that sex isn't empowering or liberating for them, and they are being very bigoted and judgmental towards men over their sexuality, which makes them actual hypocrites.

>>508578618
Yes. but the nature of reality is such that feelings are more important that logic. this has been proven time and again. you cannot logic a stable system luke a society that lasts 1000 years. And most feelings people have are actually interpretation based on heiristic algorithms that developed over millions of years. In some cases the mind is set to recieve quatum data that acts as if it traveled backwards in time, this data is impossible to interpret logically because logic cannot work out the paradix of time travel.

>>508575829 (OP)
Why are you women so pro-whore?

>>508583424
The cognitive dissonance goes deeper. They always talk about sex being casual and natural and treat it as meaningless. You should have as much sex with as many partners as you can. Yet they also argue that rape is the worst crime and should be taken super seriously by everyone.

It's tantamount to demanding that the theft of some loose change of little value, freely given to anyone who asks, should be the worst crime of all. It's nonsense and simply demonstrates their entire argument as being built on falsehoods

>>508583177
>Glocktavius

>>508583559
Uh huh, and do you truly emote what you just said?

>>508575829 (OP)
Jews.

>>508575829 (OP)
Kek, so many retards missing the point.
Who the fuck said anything about rape, braindead stupid fucking morons??
He obviously meant in like video games and other media. JFC

>>508575829 (OP)

Consent is a social construct.

>>508584428
How is a three year old fit to engage in intercourse? Do they give any reason?

>>508575829 (OP)
I consent to letting other people degrade themselves on camera for a quick buck

>>508578239
Can you please define the metrics that are evaluated for emotional intelligence?

>>508576536
>"Please don't touch me"
>REEEEEEEEE WOMEN HAVE ALL THE POWER!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you retarded?

>>508584715
Uh well if you're a good person you have it and if you disagree with cutting off 4 year old penises you don't so you're a bad person. It's all very simple

>>508584600
>Do they give any reason?
Jews. The reason is "Jews"

>#1 fantasy for almost all women is to be raped (by chad)
>women act like consent matters when they see chud
Just stop listening to women, it’s literally that simple.

>>508575829 (OP)
>>508584109
>>508583612
>>508582190
>>508577600
>>508573836
>>508580511
>>508581574
>>508584041
>>508584819
>>508564407
>>508580163
>>508537142
they're the peoples behind the "hate white women" spam
>>508584649
this is the (((german))) 4chan moderator protecting the psychological warfare every day
>>508584358
(the pilot leaf: femmanon here larp)
>>508583373
he's a known pedophile, sexual predator, cyber criminal yet
no CFIX or FBI or BK to be seen anywhere
oh don't you ever dare make a play on words explaining how shooting Shitwood would solve a problem
but you can be an open cyber criminal and a pedophile and FBI will protect you
those are all threads from the same group
it's state sponsored psychological warfare
the 4chan moderation protect it since close to a decade
that's the pilot leaf
>>508554029
RapeApe is a criminal who deserve to be in jail.
Hiro should be deported back to Japan or beaten to a pulp in paris.
He (((bought))) 4chan to turn it into a psychological warfare weapon.

>>508575829 (OP)
>Onlyfans is proof women have no problem being sexualized as long as they get paid for it.
It's more than that. They also like the excessive attention they get from desperate men, the lack of shame from other people since they work privately and the safety of whoring themselves in their own home behind a camera. It's the perfect job for the lazy, self centered, modern day woman.

>>508585054
>good person

It’s more fun when they don’t consent tho

>>508585665
same for chasing peoples like you and beating them to death
funnier when they don't consent

RapeApe
you're going to jail
and you better hope it's how your storry end

>>508585727
Ok white knight

>>508585727
>>508585782
cope

>>508577837
>>508578340
The point of the OP was that woman on onlyfans is consenting to be seen in a sexual manner, but normal people are not.

Ones fine with being seen naked because they consent to it, and the other does not consent to it.

>>508585848
>>508585853
>my proxy protect me
no it doesn protect you
RapeApe is a cyber criminal helping and abating cyber criminals activities
Hiro is a pedophile facilitating cyber crime organization activities
He, too, will get what he deserves one day
if he thinks no one will ever notice what he does, he's mistaken

>>508586168
>>my proxy protect me
kek

I like paying poor women on places like r/povertyfinance and r/suicidewatch to reluctantly Livestream themselves dancing for me and acting like various animals

It's hilarious and the women have called me a rapist and far worse even though technically it is all consensual

>>508585054
>>508584715
Best definition I could find:
>“an ability to monitor one’s own and others’ emotions, to discriminate among them, and to use the information to guide one’s thinking and actions.”

Metrics being:
>They’re aware of their own emotions.
>They’re aware of someone else’s emotions.
>They’re able to use this knowledge in social situations to their benefit.

Basically stoicism for men + picking up on women's social cues (but not really listening to her words). To say that women are better at manipulating men is hardly new or groundbreaking.
It also has some very shaky scientific rigor. Aka if someone is unaware of their own emotions then how could this be assessed accurately? You're going to mind-read them and pretend to know what they are feeling and tell them they are wrong?

>>508575829 (OP)
> "Onlyfans is proof women have no problem being sexulalized as long as they get paid for it."
> Why is consent such a difficult concept for right-wing men to understand?

Your comment is a non sequitur.

The OnlyFans comment isn't arguing against female consent. It's simply pointing out that women tend to consent to sex based on money, which means that women in general are fundamentally like prostitutes.

>>508586331
>>508584109
this you?
the exact same cyber criminal organization is abusing the 4chan platform with the help of the 4chan moderation and the laws enforcements agencies in the United States
don't you ever dare post anything even suggesting a bullet could solve problems created by mike chitwood
but you can abuse the platform to spam your state sponsored propaganda
promote pedophilia and sexual degenerate
entrap underage
go figure
the CFIX have wrong priorities

>>508583559
Proven with what? :/

>>508586168
Freedom of association is a charter right. So long as you do not commit a crime, or actively obstruct justice you can talk to or about anything you want.

>>508575829 (OP)
what does consent have to do with women being whores on onlyfans?

>>508586573
I am not a criminal and everything I do is completely legal.
You are a schizophrenic conspiracy theorist

>>508586120
these mentally ill roastoids need to accept that they cannot control the way people think.
same way they look at some bald short guy and will think "ew", a man will look at them and will think "would" unless they are fat or dressed in a burqa.

>>508584993
>sperging out strawman
You’ll never be a woman lol

>>508586794
The 4chan moderation is guilty of breaking several US laws.
They just pretend they'll never be caught because some US federal agencies protect them.
They're complicit under the laws.
4chan is a US registered LLC and as such have to submit itself to the US laws.
They break it every days and the only reason why they weren arrested already is that an agency (to not name it the FBI) is very directly protecting them.

>>508579716
> Something like 20% of zoomettes are on there

Source?

>>508577813
>they rake in most of the profits
all that stuff about OF millionaires was fake you know

>>508575829 (OP)
thats a fucking white man telling what women should do woooooooooooooow kill yourself crackers your race is done.

>>508587091
It is called the freedom of speech, leaf. You wouldn’t get it.

>>508575829 (OP)
A lot of men just do not understand the Mythology of Women and how they are used to market things, always seen as objects of flawless perfection and grace.

>>508587290
>muh freedom of speech
Richard Golden didn have any freedom of speech when he wrote a play on words suggesting shooting someone would solve the problems that person creates.
Stating a fact put you in jail for several years.
The 4chan moderation can directly protect and help cyber criminals activities and they're not guilty of anything.

>>508575829 (OP)
I need consent to sexualize someone?

>>508575829 (OP)
What? Consent? Does the ukrainian government currently need their men's consent to drag them to war against their consent, perhaps? Fuck do we need the women's consent for, then? Will the politicians perhaps not drag us all to war against our consent, if the ukraine situation ends up spiraling way out of control? I'm pretty sure they will. But we're men, so fuck us, right? We're clearly not worth anything, while the precious women are dorth everything...

>>508587461
sorry, it just doesn’t work like that

>>508575829 (OP)
Why is it so hard for you to understand that female consent is the last of anyone's concerns?

>>508579716
>Something like 20% of zoomettes are on there.
first, they claimed the girls made millions.
they did that to get more girls to come to their platform
but that got exposed

so now they're trying to normalize it to get more girls to come to their platform

who would do such a thing?

who?

>>508587566
I'm pretty sure it do be like that.
It's easily provable that the 4chan moderation are consciously helping to protect cyber criminals activities.
This thread is a proof of it. Listen, those fucktard decided to turn this shithole into an ideological food fight and abuse their power to help cyber criminals.
Why do you think Hiro or PedoApe never went after 4chan.homosexual?

>>508578239
Nah, they are just belgians. They're their own weird special kind of people.

>>508587461
Prove Golden went to prison.

>>508575829 (OP)
>Why is consent such a difficult concept for right-wing men to understand?
It's not.
>Why are you guys so blatantly pro-rape?
We're not.

>>508587809
I spoke with the person who paid his first bound.
He even posted the papers here.

>>508584993
I was never asked for my consent to allow women to vote, or work.

>>508575829 (OP)
Say it with me now: whore,
w-h-o-r-e

>>508587870
My cat says that is not even his real name.

>>508575829 (OP)
>it's the consent that makes it okay!
No, that just means you willingly made the choice and get stoned to death along with the man.

>>508587974
might be a psyop
so what
the point stand
would be an extremely elaborate one for little to no reason

>>508575829 (OP)
xD
rape is informal consent

>>508577813
Give a woman a cookie and she will end civilization.

>>508588030
>little to no reason
and yet here you are talking about it.

>>508588133
if you even had half the IQ you think you have you would understand why I talk about it
because it trigger very specific laws enforcement filters and drag very specific eyes to the thread
then I can use the thread to tell a story

>>508575829 (OP)
Women will rationalize anything that benefits them, "logic" and "double standards" play no part in their minds

>>508587760
>This thread is a proof of it.
How?

>>508586937
>these mentally ill roastoids need to accept that they cannot control the way people think.
>same way they look at some bald short guy and will think "ew", a man will look at them and will think "would" unless they are fat or dressed in a burqa.
Im not talking about your internal thoughts, im talking about action.

like the difference between being a peeping tom and going to a strip show.

>>508588308
you mean beside the extremely low effort bait of a fake post without link by a 1 post by this ID?
you need a proof this is organized psychological warfare protected by the 4chan moderation every days?
open the fucking catalog memeflag
come back tomorrow
open it again
you're going to see the same threads and the same peoples
that's beside the fact they're really fucking easy to trace

>>508588478
Sounds like any other forum, or every other Saturday with the gentlemen

>>508588608
don't play dumb when you're that dumb
explain to me very slowly why Hiro and the LLC never went legally after 4chan.homosexual after half a fucking decade
usurping 4chan copyrighted names
sell cyber criminals service on the clear net for 5 FUCKING YEARS
is used to conceal the identity of sexual predators and illegal activities
tell me
because beside complicity I can't really understand

>>508586937
Women don't care what you think. They just want you to care about what they think and feel, without judging or criticizing.

30+ years ago this was easy. The number of times politics came up would be insignificant. You could just nod along and ignore it.
Now every other conversation is communist pop-culture slop or anti-white or anti-male or anti-liberty or pro-criminal or all this other nonsense.

>>508588478
I assume these threads are jannie/mod made to see the demographics of the site then influence the retards into other ways of thinking.
I just larp.
depends on the mood.
>>508588608
you guys were dicks for threatening to leak info.

>>508578239
>emotional intelligence
lol oxymoron. kinda like
>women's intuition
there are waay too many single mothers for that to be true.

>>508583708
Because they either are or maybe will be whores, so it's defending their self interest.

>>508587091
OK but I live in Canada and I'm genuinely unaware of such activity. Shit posting on /pol/ is not illegal

>>508575829 (OP)
>consent
Forcing niggers on everyone is anti-consent. Speech police getting between a speaker and a consenting listener is anti-consent. The very concept of inclusion is anti-consent since exclusion must always be the default for consent to have meaning. The logical conclusion of making consent sacred is ancap.

Allowing these people to pretend that they care about consent is a huge part of why they are so effective at entrapping young people.

>>508588814
This is an anonymous message board and you couldn’t understand why would it conceal the identity of its users?

And what do you mean by “sexual predators”? Perhaps people who kill their unborn babies? Like they make sex just so they can summon their prey?

>>508589336
consent only matters if it benefits the famale.

>>508588814
Ever heard of this thing called Facebook or discord? They do all that and more every day. Also Canada has some fucked laws but also some based ones. It's why Bestgore was a Canadian website for years and the law explicitly said it was ok.

>>508588814
the air is complicit with the bullet that killed the innocent victim.

>>508578020
the difference being that unaccountable men won't get anywhere in life and are gerenally losers that other guys will call out. women on the otherhand, are collectively allergic to accountability.

>I don't consent to taxation
>Uhmm that doesn't count.

>>508575829 (OP)
say it with me now:
>C-H-A-D-O-N-L-Y
Incels were right about everything.
Total Simp Death.

>>508589579
>This is an anonymous message board and you couldn’t understand why would it conceal the identity of its users?
Always that fine line between lolbertarian and anarchist.
Love the laws when it fit them and pretend it should exist from time to time.
>And what do you mean by “sexual predators”? Perhaps people who kill their unborn babies? Like they make sex just so they can summon their prey?
I told you about the whole dumb thing plus you didn answer the question. Why.
>>508589789
That's not the point. Even Andrew had more moral than those filths.

>>508575829 (OP)
>Why are you guys so blatantly pro-rape?
Because it's easier than the alternatives. Rape is easy to get away with since it is based on opportunity rather than the usual motivations for crime. There are already so many missing white women as is and the law doesn't care at all unless maybe like some cop is fucking her behind his wife's back or some situation like that.

>>508575829 (OP)

White women wanna rape White men only, and I guess it is fine.

>>508590303
You're saying word salads and accusing people of crimes without evidence and attempting to ruin their reputation. Which is literally slander and is in fact illegal itself. Right now the only person in this thread who could actually be accused of commiting a crime is you

>>508590411
>Because
the op is a strawman and you fell for it.

>>508575829 (OP)
This right wing guy has a hard time understanding a concept in which it's perfectly OK for a barely legal girl to take money through e-whoring but somehow they're being manipulated against their will if they choose to enter a committed relationship with a man they deem to be too old. Seems to me that consent is simply whatever they want it to be to fit their agenda at the time. As long as an 18 year old girl can make $20 million on OF and be applauded, I'm not gonna give a fuck about how salty they get about me banging my 19 year old neighbor. I've had people in my neighborhood call the police on me multiple times when they see her leaving my house in the morning. I guess I'm doing it wrong because I'm not letting her drain my bank account? Nah fuck that, son. You can fuck that sky high. When you figure out what the fuck consent is yourself, then come talk to me.

>>508590515
Shut your retarded mouth faggot I do have a whole lot of evidence and frankly they're very fucking easy to find anyway which led me to believe someone doesn want to find them.

>>508590600
You talk a lot for someone who doesn't seem aware that people are innocent until proven guilty in a court. And that without that finding of guilt to call them a criminal or guilty is in fact criminal defamation in Canada. Further a statement, even if true, made solely for the purpose of damaging one's reputation, especially if published in a public forum, is also defamation. So like I said, the only person in this thread who could be accused of a crime is you.

>>508577813
>it is ruining an entire generation of men and women alike
It isn't. Porn is always a symptom for men, never the root problem. No man would prefer porn to a real woman if there wasn't some underlying issue. I tend to oppose 99% of anti-porn stuff because I see it as an attempt to trivialize these more fundamental issues. When I see people blaming porn for the state of men, what I hear is
>Real problems don't exist
>Every man is a lazy retard with no real problems other than being a lazy retard
and this is just insulting to most men. I tend to side against whoever insults their own audience/constituency/etc. That's precisely why I hate the left. Leftists tell men to respect women etc, but that always results in them becoming boring beta losers, which then results in those men being branded "incels" and getting mocked by the left. White people are the ones who ended slavery, gave women rights, created public welfare systems etc, but white people are the ones leftists want to genocide. Etc, etc. The left hate their own people, so I hate them. Similarly most anti-porn types seem to hate men, because they can't conceive of the fact that porn only becomes habitual when men have already given up hope, and that other bad things need to happen before men reach this point. If porn is the root cause then this is like saying men just gave up hope for no reason, just pure laziness etc, which shows contempt for their own audience/constituency/etc.

>>508577813
>>508592121
You can make analogies with drugs in the sense that people start doing opiates due to other problems, but just because the opiates weren't the root cause doesn't mean they aren't a problem in and of themselves, but the problem with the drugs analogy is that 99% of drugs are not down-and-outers using them to drown out chronic problems, they are privileged party bros/girls fucking themselves up for indulgence. Anyone in this position sexually will just do hookups etc, not porn. Consequently pushing the drugs analogy too hard carries an implicit accusation of privilege, which is going to be interpreted as an insult by 99% of the people it's being applied to.

>>508588822
>sister keeps insisting on bringing up politics
>she's reddit incarnate so it's all stupid commie shit
>keep calmly explaining to her why reality doesn't work that way
>she's clearly embarrassed as fuck very time, her head looks like a tomato
>yet she keeps doing it again anyway the next time we talk
Women never learn.

And yeah, their
>you need to listen to all my opinions
>BUT
>you are not allowed to EVER judge any of them!
is obnoxious as hell.
If they don't want me to judge, maybe they should keep their stupid shit to themselves. I am not telling her about my schizo theories how the next episode of my mystery anime will continue either because I know she wouldn't care and would think it cringe as fuck.

Even worse when they already suspect you think poorly of them but then have to keep digging to try and make you say it out loud, only to have a meltdown when you do.
If she cannot handle it, how about she stops digging? I was polite enough to only think it instead of saying it, she could have accepted that gesture of courtesy from my side.

>>508577630
>Just take away their rights, that is the only solution.
You can't "take" their rights away but it is possible that they would give up the vote willingly. Did you know the 19th Amendment had no major popular support? Neither women nor men wanted it. Referendums passed in fewer then half of the states before it finally got pushed through Congress. Women generally don't care about politics and thus have no actual interest in voting. It's possible that with a big enough advertising budget, that women could be convinced to vote away their right to vote. What we need is a couple of based billionaires to fund the required PR campaigns for women to convince other women that voting is bad and harmful.

>>508591292
>You talk a lot for someone who doesn't seem aware that people are innocent until proven guilty in a court. And that without that finding of guilt to call them a criminal or guilty is in fact criminal defamation in Canada. Further a statement, even if true, made solely for the purpose of damaging one's reputation, especially if published in a public forum, is also defamation. So like I said, the only person in this thread who could be accused of a crime is you.
Love the laws when it fit them. You're an anarchist RapeApe.
Live up to it until the end.

>>508593179
>gibberish word salad
Have you ever once even glanced at the criminal code?

>>508575829 (OP)
ℕ ∈ a therefore ℕ = a so ℕ = ℕ and ℕ is ℕigger

>>508593323
You're going to jail RapeApe. You're a criminal. Blowing the whistle on criminals activities isn illegal.
Tell me now, how much did you make from the /r9k/ fags and the 4chan.faggot sevices

>>508593575
Madness

>>508575829 (OP)
Because women shouldn't have rights and men should be strong enough defend their family from rape.

Rape is only problem when you flood your country niggers and moral degeneracy anyway.
Something only possible with women allowed rights.

>>508594039
Why are you guys refusing to take legal actions against 4chan.faggot?
Why is Hiro repeating the same pattern as when he owned 2ch?
Namely facilitating criminals activities and protecting criminal organization who abuse his user base?
Who trained him?
Who is he even working for then?

>>508575829 (OP)
Incels arent right wing in any regard.