Zoomer fashion is based on Instagram, Pinterest, and TikTok; they spend 1000% more than previous generations did, all out of desperation for feeling left out of the trend of the month.
Back in the day, while there was very superficial fashion, most dressed based on what genuinely interested them, and even dressed without caring about what they wore (nowadays, it's a sin).
Nowadays, there's no chance of a tribe; everyone is a copy of a copy.
There were entire subcultures born from thousands of different situations.
There are different trends today, but they are short-lived, and are based on status, money, sex, and in the algorithm.
Anyway, it seems that zoomers don't have the chance to choose, nor the chance to not care what they wear.
>>508585414 (OP)That's just cringe 90s clothes... It was never cool. Companies are properly just selling off old stocks for a profit
>>508585414 (OP)There is nothing based about being a consumerist whore.
They will happily do what Bieber did, i.e., sell their butthole to a pack of niggers for something shiny.
>>508585668You are just pissed that nobody would ever offer money for your ass
>>508585852I have screencaps of rich sugar mommies offering me money for my cock.
You are a faggot that worships niggerjewfashion will take niggerjew AIDS shots in your gaping bussy to pay for it.
>>508585414 (OP)Don't forget this. Biggest cancer of it all.
dudes
md5: 6d873d3ab0fd600a0e2f0fd3fbab765f
🔍
I just dress like this constantly at all times for the last 20 years and never change my fashion sense.
>>508586548I bet you don't look anything like those guys though lol
>>508586548Now that is being a rebel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKX95ZcCVL0
>>508586724So should one dress worse if they are not as attractive as those men?
>>508586364He's a hero, he doesn't need to care, and that's good; the thing is that a lot of people today care too much, and aboot clothing that is based on being cute or sexy or sigma or coquette or whatever.
>>508586141wtf is that? Is there a site to pick up old broads?
>>508586935lipstick on a pig, memeflaggot
>>508586935No, that style is classic, it last forever. You won't have to throw a thing. (Maybe that skinny green pants, looks uncomfortable)
It was imperfect and that was good.
This people were more free than zoomers.
And I say it not to insult but to make them see.
>>508585414 (OP)Guys and girls all dress in the same baggy androgynous slop. They're all bisexual social media addicts. I know they got fucked by covid lockdowns but theres no excuse why theyre all autistic and incapable of holding a conversation. Fuck GenX for raising these losers, worthless generation.
>>508588435The can hold a conversation, but one have to aproach them with a camera and a mic, and ask them bar conversations, but on the street, like "Wich Mel Gibson movie is the best?"
Some use to dress without giving an f.
Even were they dressed the same was because of some idea, good or bad, an idea in common. Now the idea is just a jerk off.
>>508587209ok? so what is your point? you would have me dress in hoodies and track pants and trainers?
