lmao

>An early US intelligence assessment indicates that the US military strikes on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities last week did not destroy the core components of Tehran’s nuclear program and likely only set it back by months, CNN reports, citing three people briefed on it.

>>508614273
>>508614252 (OP)
assessing my ass, unless they are there they can speculate on whatever

Iran was not pursuing a nuclear weapon, but it will taken its 80% enriched Uranium to 100% now. Expect a successful nuclear test by the end of the year.

>>508614451
reminder: they can build bombs with what they've got already

>>508614252 (OP)
That is classified, delete this immediately.

>>508614252 (OP)
4D'D

>>508614525
Dirty bombs, not nukes. Also, if Israel or America gets dirty-bombed, it will be by Israel who actually can make nukes.

kwab

Then strike it again, this time harder.

>>508614252 (OP)
So, total Iran victory after all?

Mountain bases like that are literally built to withstand nukes, anyone who thought a bunker buster was going to do shit was deluding themselves.

>>508614525
No, they purposefully never made 100% enriched U235 or plutonium. But you can expect a plutonium breeder reactor to go up pretty soon.

>>508614653
Nah you can make actual nukes with uranium enriched to a way lower grade than the 80% they've got now, but the warhead would have to be pretty big and would not fit in their ballistics. It's Miniaturized warheads that need 90% enriched uranium.

>>508615302
Bunker busters go much deeper than nukes

>>508614252 (OP)
>fake news

>sources say
cringe

>>508615458
Bunker busters are designed for bunkers built in ordinary dirt or concrete, they aren't built for solid mountain

>>508615491
>downloading a .pdf from 4chan
Whoever does this deserves what they get. Your PC finna glow brighter than the sun.

>>508614653
>>508615332
you don't need 100% U235 to make a bomb

>>508615343
the warhead wouldn't even be that big

>>508615915
You certainly need more than 80%
90% is the minimum, and it would not be a great bomb. For a serious warhead you want >95% or even better, >99% U235.
Or else just get Plutonium 239 or Uranium 233, both of which are actually easier to do than the old fashioned U235 stuff. Really not sure why countries still bother with U235 bombs.

>>508614410
Why do you think a bomb can collapse a mountain, then?

If you can’t understand the scale of geological time correctly, maybe you should stick to reality TV or Netflix.

>>508614252 (OP)
Israeli propaganda. This is just an excuse to bomb you more you retarded brownoid scum. That's unless you like being bombed.

>>508614252 (OP)
These morons are trying to fuck up the lie. It's supposed to establish that iran is dealt with now so isreal can fuck off for a bit, regardless if iran has anything or not. Fucking kike media is trying to reignite war like always.

Again, The default position of people correctly educated in Geology: A bomb cannot break a mountain.

>>508615887
bahahahah
>>508615491
Better believe the kike anon.
He means well keeeeeeeeek

>>508616196
I like it when oil prices are high and the stock market is uncertain. I also like paranoid Jews who can’t live their lives comfortably because Iranian rockets are coming at them.

Jews are only 8 million in that area. Persians and Azerbaijanis (valids) are 70 million at least.

>>508614252 (OP)
Oh, so “zIoN dOn” didn’t actually help Israel in any way? Tell me how that’s a bad thing, again.

>Source : Jew York Times

>>508616337
Have a gneiss day

>CNN

>>508616708
I think it’s great. Only thing missing are dead American troops. But with each successive round of conflict, the opportunity arises.

>>508616739
I shale.

It's in Israels best interest to say the strikes were ineffective. NYT will always serve Israel since 90% of the editorial staff is Jewish.

>>508616172
Because the instructions they stole say to use U235. Nobody outside of the US knows how to develop nukes from scratch. So they have to use stolen blueprints and instructions and they don't have the knowledge to veer away from said instructions.

>>508614252 (OP)
Uh oh guess we gotta keep bombing them!

>>508617052
It's 80 year old technology, everybody who cares knows how to build them.

>>508616172
no you don't you retard, look at the table
the critical mass of 70% U235 is plenty small enough to fit in a missile

>>508617119
Proof?

>>508617052
You are mistaken. A U235 bomb could not be simpler. It's literally picrel. You think I'm joking but I'm not.

>>508617324
it's so simple to make a U235 bomb that they literally didn't even bother to test it before dropping one on hiroshima

>>508617302
You should need proof for my statement if you have proof of yours, faggot.

>>508614252 (OP)
>>508614273
>An early US intelligence assessment indicates that the US military strikes on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities last week did not destroy the core components of Tehran’s nuclear program and likely only set it back by months, CNN reports, citing three people briefed on it.
>>508615207
>>508615302

LOL
LMAO EVEN

>>508617463
US is the only country to develop nukes. We used them. I don't need proof of common knowledge. Now you prove that other countries have built a nuke. I'll wait.

>>508617242
It's not only about weight, mango. You want density of fissile material. If you have U238 mixed in with your U235 it's analogous to having wet black powder. U238 will absorb your neutrons instead of contributing to the detonation.

>>508617881
>US is the only country to develop nukes.
What? Are you a schizo?

>>508617881

>>508614273
>and likely only set it back by months
Wait, if the plants weren't destroyed, then how could they be set back by months? Are they implying they managed to at least damage something important?
Seems like mutt cope so far

We could always just bomb them again. NEXT!

Trump sucked kike cock and gloat about it in the faces of his own supporters for nothing

>>508617984
it's in the critical mass table you fucking mongoloid, 60% uranium will go bang just fine

>U238 will absorb your neutrons instead of contributing to the detonation.
also wrong, it will fission, but won't propagate a fission reaction
a lot of the energy in bombs can come from the depleted uranium tamper

>>508614252 (OP)
Oh no no no! Goyim you have to strike them again you just have to!!

>>508618130
>and likely only set it back by months
>Wait, if the plants weren't destroyed, then how could they be set back by months? Are they implying they managed to at least damage something important?
Being forced to dismantle equipment and evacuate it, then set it up somewhere else is a setback I guess

>>508618130
It's entirely cope. They admitted right away they didn't destroy the Uranium stockpile, but they were implying they destroy the centrifuges and infrastructure for refining U235. And now we find out they didn't even do that much -- they've probably already bulldozed out the rubble and work crews will patch up the archways before the end of the month. The most labor intensive thing they'll probably have to do is build formwork for the concrete arches that were damaged.

>>508614252 (OP)
>sources say
>assessment suggests

>>508614252 (OP)
>(((sources))) say
fuck you, Bibi, you lost, you go to jail now

>>508618225
How are you going to keep shilling this narrative when he denounces jews publicly like he just did?

>>508617881
>US is the only country to develop nukes.
Delusional retard.

It's hilarious thinking somewhere like Iran can be kept from the bomb if they really wanted it. Fucking Pakistan and Indian have them. Your only options are diplomacy or total war.

>>508618000
So you have no proof. The US has video evidence as well as victims. What other country has the same?

>sources tell me the bombs didnt blow up the facility
>okay did they go to it?
>w-well no but..
kek

>>508614252 (OP)

What's an early assessment? We dunno until we've finally assessed it.

Opinion disregarded.

>>508618518
Keep coping, retard. See if you can fall for it 6 million times in a row.

>>508617881
Nigga do you know they tests nukes right
UK, Russia, China, India
A bunch of nuclear countries are nuclear because they've tested and acquired them retard

>>508619208
Video proof of tests?

>>508619044
I don't know if you are a schizo or just retarded, but this is not worth my time. Google it if you don't know what countries have nuclear weapons and what is the evidence.

>>508619208
you don't even need to test a U235 nuke, they're that simple to make if you have the material
the testing is because Pu239 implosion designs are hard

>>508618518
Trump gave the kikes everything they wanted then gloat in the faces of his supporters then after sevicing the kikes on then did he give the tiniest criticism of both Iran and Israel

Worthless goddamn kike cock sucking nigger

>>508619409
I accept your concession.

>>508614252 (OP)
> Rat Id

>>508619206
Substance less post, why even bother posting you tranny?
>>508619620
>Trump gave the kikes everything they wanted
Then why did he demand they return their bombers heading to Iran? I don't know, it seems like jews wanted a war with Iran and Trump cancelled it. What do I know, I live in reality and don't get all my news from leftists faggots and "right wing" grifters