Thread 508621230 - /pol/ [Archived: 894 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: QI36NNiMUnited States
6/24/2025, 10:48:10 PM No.508621230
untitled
untitled
md5: 2ee890a133fe482bcd3979072bed60fd🔍
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/23/well/the-ick.html
https://archive.is/poF5H
Replies: >>508621878
Anonymous ID: BrHFAqsHUnited States
6/24/2025, 10:49:27 PM No.508621371
1750710714670600
1750710714670600
md5: 6c13a58a6dba6d6fc12ecc6b996b3a42🔍
Anonymous ID: BqsrRHs+United States
6/24/2025, 10:49:28 PM No.508621374
I'm so glad I married a woman who responds to the concept of "ick" with
>that's fucking dumb
Anonymous ID: mDAIXZECUnited States
6/24/2025, 10:54:37 PM No.508621878
>>508621230 (OP)
>(((experts)))
Why do they still use this knowing no one takes that word seriously?