>>508635203 (OP)>RTthat was ONE assessment that was given low confidence- it was leaked for political purposes. they purposefully didn't leak the other assessments. they were asked in a worst case scenario where ferdow wasn't destroyed, how quickly they would be able to make a bomb.
>https://x.com/DAVIDHALBRIGHT1/status/1937617920508531159?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw"We saw the reports on the leaked DIA report, and have a few comments. The aspects raised are addressing a narrow question, albeit an important one, namely how quickly could Iran make a nuclear weapon in a worst case assessment post-attack. With residual stocks of 60 percent and hidden centrifuges, Iran retains an ability to breakout and produce weapon-grade uranium. We agree, but this is an on-going process, where it is necessary to continue hunting down these items or make a deal where Iran has to give them up."