Thread 508636796

yeah, we’re fucked

>>508636796 (OP)
I mean it’s a cringe post but AI is gonna take over the world
Remember craiyon when it was just black and white blurs a few years ago and now we have veo 3

>>508636796 (OP)
He did pretty good for drawing it upside down

>>508637102
veo 3 is dogshit too, and ai images are still easily identifiable from the thumbnails alone. just because it's "better" than it was a few years ago, AI shit is still terrible

>>508636796 (OP)
>I suck at exercise
>Im great at Ozempic

>>508636796 (OP)
Yeah man, we're fucked because luddites like you refuse to move on to the next stage.

Increasing art and capability to the masses is a good thing and snooty "artists" like you are mad you can't charge people $80 for a shitty drawing of their OC anymore.

>>508637356
lmao

>>508637469
I agree with you for the most part. I feel different on one thing though, imagination.
I want a picture with my specific thoughts, I'm sure AI would do a great job. Same with AI music.
You can say, "Van Gogh style", or what have you, but then you'll end up with an assembly line style akin to Andy Warhol.
I think true genius in art will still come from human artists. This will hopefully separate the wheat from the chaff.

>>508637369
Ozempic works by punishing you with severe diarrhea if you eat too much garbage food at a time.

>>508637263
is that a clip on lav?
a chain for your chain. a joint clip to hold your roach in the shape of a Cheeto for the munchies. and a bong pipe for your bong. air going out has to be matched by air going in

the flag jersey and tattoos are on point

>>508638683
as it should. restoring the default

I love AI art, I go beyond standard setting and use artists like Bisley, Elmore, Tim White, Matthew Rodney, Moebius. Mix styles an input. It really helped with my depression.

>>508638394
they're reading your brain waves. they can already recreate images you're only focusing thought on.
hoping to record dreams. look into that. it's spooky but already here

>>508639599
I'm not an artist, so it doesn't affect ne personally. I work in the trades and the only thing they'll see in my brain is a deep deep hatred for jews.

I have se suspicion that a lot of AI enthusiasts are just people with no ability to picture things in their mind. They can finally put into an image the thing they were thinking about and feel like it is a revolutionary technology.
Look at what a lot of AI spammers create, the image equivalent of a single sentence. For anyone with the ability to imagine these images are severely lacking and offer little value, but for a lot this is the first time they can mimic imagining a photo realistic apple in their heads.

I'm not against AI image generation, but I see it as the invention of the typewriter, having access to it does not give you the ability to create a great novel; AI image generators can create actual art, but only when used by people with the capacity to create art, for everyone else they are just slop machines.

>>508639929
>I have se suspicion that a lot of AI enthusiasts are just people with no ability to picture things in their mind.
peak irony coming from a retarded 90Iq mexican, lmao

>>508636796 (OP)
You're drawing the lion upside down

>>508640091
Paisano...

If you can't put in the work to forge your own skill you are admitting you are lazy and a coward afraid of his own failure

>>508639929
More eloquently put than my take on it. I don't understand how anyone cannot just visualize number one. Just think about it. I'm sure people cannot, but it just blows my mind. It's a fucking apple, you've seen them, or pictures of them, for a long time.
Try it with a blunt, or a 40 oz. of malt liquor, can the "usual suspects" do that?
You know how a nigger and an apple are alike?
>they both look good hanging from a tree

>>508636796 (OP)
>me making AI “art”

>>508636796 (OP)
It takes effort to make genuinely good AI art though. If you are a real artist and not some capitalist dog you shouldn't give a shit what happens to all the artist jobs. Those jobs were to produce objectively worthless shit anyways like Disney movies and Fast and the Furious sequels.

>>508640497
I can make picture the number 1 in my mind, and then make it into a flesh creature with only an asshole and I can repeatedly fuck it in my mind and I can picture it’s goosebumps as we both climax

>>508639929
It should be more and more detailed versions of imagining Israel on fire.

>>508636796 (OP)
So whens AI taking over? This hype has been going on for a few years already and I fail to see any results. And no creating pictures with prompts isnt going to revolutionize anything.

>>508639929
I think it's the opposite. It's people with no genuine imagination capacity of their own that are upset that AI is coming for their jobs. Jobs that shouldn't have existed in the first place. Now everyone is free to pursue art for art's sake alone, and the liberal weeps.

>>508640690
You just made me visualize that. Fuck. Not that I'm complaining of course, but fuck.

>>508640771
Remember when computers were only for nerds? I do.

>>508640921
I miss when this was a place, a place that you had to physically go to, and not just Reality 2.0.

>>508639929
I have imagination so vivid I imagine my own porn to jack off to, but I can't draw worth a damn.
Eventually we will have brain to image technology so I can goon harder.

>>508636796 (OP)
kek , humanity is going to get niggerjeeted into the stone age so who cares?
GIBS FURRY PORN NOW

>>508637219
>Upside down! Upside down!

>>508641072
same. I always goon to a cute teenage girl i once knew. SHe's now 20, but i still goon to her 16 year old self

>>508636796 (OP)
>great at typing words into a box
kill every single AIcel

>>508639929
you sound like a homosexual

>>508641054
You should come to one of my cookouts.

>>508640497
If I knew how to draw I would try to make a little cartoon about it
>A man pictures a beautiful apple in his head
>Draws it and does not look as good as he wanted
>Gets angry
>Meanwhile another man pictures a suggestion of an apple shape
>Generates an image
>It surpasses everything he could ever imagine, still inferior in many ways to what the guy drew
It will be so fucking meta to do it in AI

>>508640582
I've seen people use AI's struggles with spaces and 3D space to create a very distinctive style and feel, but most importantly they actually convey emotions and ideas that go beyond the prompt

>>508640849
It will only kill smut furry artists, actual artists are not in any trouble. But yes, Art should not be the business it is today

>>508641300
Cousin, don't run from me

>>508641228
I do the same to a girl that I used to work with.

>>508641072
I think once you get over the first hurdle, drawing isn't too hard. Getting the anatomical proportions right is the first step

>>508641559
A comedy about a white supremacist, who due to some shenanigans now has to deal with a spic who thinks they are related. Movie ends with some L.A. gang getting tricked into killing all black people and being recognized as honorary whites, meanwhile our protagonists learns about the meaning of family

>>508639929
Wrong.
Legit just a no artistic talent sort but with an overactive imagination to the point of synethsesia. The problem is I put hand to paper and all I see is garbage which doesnt even come close to what's in my head. Just garbage over and over and over and over again. Its like there isn't a fundamental mechanism thst allows my hands to create in ways that my brain allows. I was "okay ish" at sculpting but that couldn't address certain ideas and/or complexity that I wanted.

Meanwhile, I can very easily generate logical flow on a prompt and obtain the more esoteric and obscure concepts to a better degree of satisfaction. It takes a little bit more work and some special formatting, but it works and seeing the product removes all stress I've had on the ideas.

You have no idea how psychologically painful it is to have ideas thst you can't put to paper so others might finally see what is going on inside your mind. It's not only frustrating, its maddening.

AI is a panacea from this madness.

>>508636796 (OP)
"artists" are ablist scum

>>508636796 (OP)
>the oldfaggot painter said as he sees the first camera being invented

>>508641386
Supposing someone can visualize an apple, we can so that part isn't hard. But I would never be able to put it on canvas. My brother probably could, but not me. Does this mean that artists can visualize the apple better than me?
On the opposite side of the coin, I would easily defeat my brother in actually describing the apple. It's color, it's taste, its weight, how it feels even when it's less than ripe.
Is my brother visualizing better by drawing a facsimile of it, or am I better because I can describe it? To a blind person, I win, but to a lot of others I lose.

I wonder what would Bob Ross would think about AI Art

>>508636796 (OP)
NOOOOOOO YOU CANT PRAISE YOURSELF FOR CREATIVELY MANIPULATING AN ARTISTIC MEDIUM WITH LITERACY

>>508642226
>here's a pretty little screen. Let's use black to cover it completely up

>>508641781
>>508642207
I suck at drawing but I am surprisingly good at sculpting (takingn into account that I have zero training). Maybe your call is somewhere else.
But I'm not talking about people with too much imagination but not enough artistic ability, I'm talking about people with so little imagination that anything AI poops out seems like a miracle. There is such a thing as people with good technical ability, but no artistic ability, look at the crowd of people who do pencil photo realistic drawings of celebrities, a filter could replace their work.

>>508637469
You can't create art with a computer, only images. Everyone with a brain knows none of this is art. Art museums are all over the country, all over the world and you can see both masterworks and the best communal works up close for free. That's the only way art can be viewed. Anons trade thumbnail jpegs and think that means something. I wouldn't expect you to understand. It's only by mammals for mammals.
>>508639596
It's just CGI. If you make marks by hand you'll know the truth, feel better and it'll render the digital works meaningless. No amount of CGI can compare to something you assemble by hand, a single broad brush stroke makes it all obsolete.

>>508641767
see, only AI can bring your retarded ideas to life
be humble

>>508642226
He would probably be hopeful this would free professional artists from having to labor for something they don't genuinely love, while also being disappointed at how so many younger people would see it as a reason to never even try.

>>508636796 (OP)
They are afraid because AI art will take over the garbage art industry while the few brilliant or tenacious artists will thrive. Most of the art world is overpaid or underpaid garbage, and AI will tear that apart

>>508642520
>You can't create art with a computer, only images
You can create art with a paintbrush, only a brushstroke

>>508642342
>LITERACY
Again, just having the ability to write does not make you a writer. The wave of AI usage is not people suddenly making art, it's people putting a window into their soulless and vapid selfs. NPCs LARPing as human

>>508642521
Overpayed furry twitter artists can bring any disgusting idea to life

>>508638683
that's what garbage food does anon

>>508639929
I feel like all the A.I content is liked in a vacuum outside of memes. Shitting out 1000 images and posting on your art account will just have you basically ignored. Artists aren't gonna stop making art because machines can do it faster. There's always something hyper specific people will want from their art like being in control of the compositions. Also there's artists out there with aphantasia that can still draw despite lacking an imagination.

>>508636796 (OP)
The artists that adopt AI will make some really cool shit. Artists can hyper specialize now, for example, they can focus on the subject and have AI handle the background. The video generation workflows with pose control and start/stop frames are wild. Some day a single artist will be able to make animations that are actually worth watching in a matter of weeks or months.

Based total artist death

>>508642476
My calling is definitely not anything artistic. (Unless you classify die repair an artform.) But art, in the classical sense, will probably be taken over by AI. Shit, 3D printing can sculpt if you tell it what to do. These machines will write your songs and movies, they'll act in your movies with whatever actions you wish, and they'll sculpt the entire set to boot (if a set is actually needed. Which I doubt).
The more that I think about it, we are fucked. Matrix/Terminator style all mixed into one.

AI music bullshit has impressed me more than AI visual art.
like i took this simple little melody i played out on some browser based piano
https://litter.catbox.moe/d7mceoptn6146bm4.mp3
then told it to make a song that's "minor key, math metal, haunting, foreboding, angelic, surreal, ghostly"
and then in 20 seconds got this
https://litter.catbox.moe/arhbm7thrfw2aprz.mp3
0:24 to 1:15 is fuckin' rad

>>508639306
Right bro

>>508637469
>all art is jpgs
Poorfag detected

>>508642696
I was thinking the same thing, but then I thought, "once an artist, or musician, creates a hit tune or art piece, the Ai will simply copy the style". So you get one piece that better be your magnum opus or masterwork.

>>508643735
Naw your art just sucks.

Sorry I can make passable for what I need

>>508643848
Actual art costs more money than you will ever see in 10 years

>>508643610
this music is nonsense with no real structure

>>508636796 (OP)

Retards don't understand that consumer AI is meant to make you cognitively dependent, while people with access to the frontier models are doing things you'll never know about until it's too late:

>ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools (2023)

>Engineering Model Leap71
https://leap71.com/gallery/

You retards are worried about AI slop from these consumer cattle production plants, meanwhile people are inventing a future you will never see because you're being told that AI is worthless and you believe it
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05376

>>508644281
are you familiar with the math metal genre?
i was wanting it to do something like this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iczM4AJWgY
but instrumental and with a more somber vibe and i think it nailed it.
it's supposed to have complex rhythms, odd time signatures, unpredictability, abrupt tempo changes, polyrhythms and riffs that rarely repeat.

>>508637356
The best AI slop has no tells. It's entirely a skill issue at this point. AI shartists don't know how to make images look good.

>>508637369
Fluoride stare is kind of scary

>>508638683
so it found the Red dye that's been being put in?
who woulda thought

AI art will only replace all the simple, low effort pictures, memes, etc. that people want to post just one time and are not really art.

Its just so much more convenient to have dall-e draw for me a sóyjak edit of some specific thing rather than waste half an hour on photoshop making it myself

It will also replace that globohomo artstyle and similar "minimalist" slop, which is not even art

>>508645196
show us
Because Veo doesnt work as martket AGAIN
>skill issue
yea, in training the models

>>508645196
that's not what baffles me, tho
the truly astonishing part about the subhuman AI-permacopers is that they've watched AI get exponentially better by the week for two years, and still reply with "BUT AI CAN'T DO X"
it's literal mental retardation, unironically