As many of you are aware, the grifters on YouTube are using /pol/ memes as a means to harvest views for "edgy" channels that exist only for the benefit of projects such as Pogo and Zephyr.

One such channel is named in the title here and while the overall theme of this content is red pill, the commentary underlying it is being used as a vehicle for propaganda aimed at redpilled men.

A prime example of this is the phrase, "she voted for it," where this is a popular response to stories of migrants raping women and children. This is a lie and a use of victim-blaming intended to trick Western White men into standing down and allowing these women to "get what they deserve."

>the majority of the West voted NO to open borders
>the jews forced the issue upon us
>the jews imported vast numbers of migrants to insure that the host civilizations were overwhelmed
>the jews subverted the law and courts to accommodate the invaders in the commission of their crimes

No one voted for their children to be raped. No one voted for their homeland to be destroyed. No one voted for any of this bullshit.

The issue with this channel is that it pretends to promote red pill awareness BUT DELETES COMMENTS that disagree with the propaganda in the commentary section.

Fuck these grifters. And fuck YouTube.

>>508640051 (OP)
Yes, they've been doing that since at least 2009 on here.

>grifters on YouTube are using /pol/ memes
Let them occupy the memes of yesteryear so we can advance towards the memes of tomorrow

The purpose of saying "she voted for it" is to take issue with oblivious liberals who support mass immigration, are shocked by the consequences of it, and then throw a fit when you point out the connection. Normies in general are apt to bury their heads in the sand until something directly affects them

>>508640051 (OP)
you just know shes looking at her black boyfriend

>>508640263

I don't care about the memes; that is just how they conceal or camouflage their intentions; which are to insinuate to the viewers through the upvote of comments that are essentially communist propaganda. You're prevented from voicing any disagreement with statements that are blatantly false and harmful to the victims of migrant crime; this design is to give the appearance of full public support.

The contrast between complaining about migration, on the one hand, via memes and videos hijacked or mirrored from other sources; while, on the other, hosting a bot farm of communist propaganda which essentially says that "the West deserves to be invaded and raped" is what I'm drawing attention to - as it seems to be going unnoticed (although, this is likely due to the deletion of commentary pointing it out).

I'd like shine a line on these psyops to prevent them from being successful; the West can't afford to give a rape-pass to foreigners based upon the false presuppositions of jews that the victims (even though most of them are underage) voted for their own victimization.

>>508640878

I know a lot more than you would believe; in due time, even (you) will suffer the consequences of your corruption.

>>508640051 (OP)
>grifters on YouTube

>>508641270
When someone says "she voted for it", it's a very hyperbolic way to say women shouldn't vote, which is very antifeminist. Isn't that how you understand it?

>>508640118
>first post deleted post.

>>508640863

There are levels to this game and while, from your perspective, it may seem that you're "owning the liberals," from a meta perspective of social engineering, this "she voted for it" campaign of lies is designed to further the division between the People (based upon the fallacy and failure of a two-party political system) by advocating for callousness, heartlessness, and permission in response to migrant criminality.

The essence of the propaganda is: "do nothing and enjoy the misery of your political enemies - until something similar happens to you and/or your family."

This is bullshit and you've been deceived into playing a game where the only winners are the jews.

>>508641872

The first post was by a German flag and still shows up on my view of this thread. He said:

>Yes, they've been doing that since at least 2009 on here.

Don't know why it would be deleted?

>>508640051 (OP)
what channels? i only use youtube to listen to music

>>508642119
i was just pointing out the irony

>>508641689
See
>>508641939

>>508640051 (OP)
There is an effort to divide men and women, feminism on the left. Add karen , both L and R. Then the " she voted for it " meme.
White Men must connect and re assert their power.

>>508641689

Every party in White nations are open borders, so all voters voted for it . Trump is the lone vote that is measurably better
But
Some openly promote it
A better phrase would have had idea if you are pro migrant you are responsible for this.
Also , "Karen "is anti White

>>508641939
It's more a recognition that you, personally, can't do anything about the problem so long as half the population continues to enable it

>>508640051 (OP)
women quite literally did vote for it though

>>508640051 (OP)
>White_Beauty
That whore is a Mongoloid from Russia
It fucking amazes me how people can't spot the difference between European Whites and Mongoloid Mutt " Whites "

>>508642257
Do you agree with this anon >>508642278 when he says
>"Every party in White nations are open borders"

The fact is that Kikes drive a specific brand of "social justice" that promotes open borders and one side claims to resist it. We are operating on the claim, or the stated principle, not the reality of their corruption.

>>508642383

Half the population? Half of the population doesn't even vote; so, half of half of the population, you mean to say? I don't actually know how many people vote but if there were any power in voting between Left (shabbos golem) and Right (shabbos golem), then you'd likely be living under a monarchy or despot instead of a jewish oligarchy hiding itself behind a facade of democracy (voter fraud).

Half of no country anywhere in the world voted for demographic replacement and the rape of it's women and children.

>>508642660

I agree but only that this is the way reality is distorted by the dilemma of only having a choice between Left versus Right; where both sides are controlled by the same anti White interests.

>>508643322
I agree with you that saying "she voted for it" is probably something we should stop saying, but you admit it's a /pol/ meme. Are you saying there are using it out of context? Anyway, I personally think we should fight this battle from within, as Democrats. Show women they shouldn't vote by arguing in favor of their interests. Im a registered Democrat since 9 months ago or so

>jewtube
I'm not reading that

>>508643565

I originally seen the "she voted for it" lie here on /pol/ but I wouldn't say it's organic to this community. I view it as outside influence seeking to use /pol/ as a platform for harmful propaganda; it's definitely not in the interest of the West to adopt a policy of allowing criminality to evade justice simply because the victims are presumably leftist voters (and as said previously, the majority are underage girls so it's a blatantly false premise that "they voted for it.")

As far the usage of the meme, it's used within the context of victim-blaming and insinuating that Western men should allow it to happen.

>>508644101
>I originally seen the "she voted for it" lie here on /pol/ but I wouldn't say it's organic to this community
It was originally a /pol/ "meme" and that's using the term very loosely. It was more of a call and response type affect. People post Western White women getting done some way by a foreigner and someone else would post "She voted for it.
But the main point as been stated is that it's meant you wouldn't have the problems you have if the people getting fucked over by them would stop voting for it.

>>508644101
OK, that's the disconnect. For clarity, I think you'll want to attack the meme itself and make the YouTube channels your evidence, not attack the YouTube channels and use the meme as evidence.

>>508644101
what's this? what's this? an actual thread with (some at least) people in it??

almost everything here is inorganic. "their" memes are only getting better because they're helped by ai, so they seem less retarded than they were in the past (evil can only corrupt...)

And yes, 'they voted for it' is a clever, evil worm inside one's head. Apparently half-truth, but corrupting. Very effective

>>508640051 (OP)
Trvke bump.
Time to act back.

>>508644744
>because they're helped by ai,
Most of the major AI has been trained on /pol/ datasets, they're just programmed to label most of the content on here as "against their guidelines". This website is a bot hell. And they use LLM's to do it.

I just noticed that the title of my thread is missing.

>Legion of Men

This is the bullshit that I'm talking about; censorship and suppression of information to accommodate social engineering, psyops, and fifth Gen warfare.

I know that I titled this thread, "Legion of Men," so why was it deleted?