>>508649536 (OP)>form of flexIn a sense. Women are very cult cum-by-yah types, and they way they test you for authoritarian compliance is straight up lying to your face. Calling a woman a female is not offensive in the least. BUT, by saying it is, you have a choice: bend the knee and accept it, thus proving you are part of the woman borg collective and not in need of additional nagging to bring you to heel, OR you don't accept it, get excommunicated from the little female collective and get shamed nonstop from their henpecking. Unless you are Chad, then you can call her a cunt to her face and she gets wet.
Other notable examples is "all women are 10s" and "healthy at every size". These things are clearly on their face false, but women DEMAND you accept this bullshit as a form of cuckoldry. It's basically shit testing, but on the social scale.
Historically, men never put up with shit - that is what scold bridles were for. Bitch be nagging? Fucking muzzle her. Only blue pill cucked men put up with this crap, and of course women never reward these men for compliance in any way.
>>508650877Females is a larger catch all - women refers to adult only females, while females includes the girls too. It's part of the lexicon due to the science jargon red pillers have from psych and so-sci. Ladies is no longer relevant post 1900, no woman is a lady in the current year.