Control for company size

>globalization and mass immigration are good for workers -Biden, Obama, Hillary, Kamala

>>508650527 (OP)
the poors wage slave in india for a penny a day, you are not poor

>>508650699
It's good for shareholders, and that's all that matters.

>>508650588
Why? Companies didn't naturally get larger, government regulation imposed by the rich killed small business in the USA

>>508650527 (OP)

>>508650699
You forgot Bill Clinton, he started this mess.

>>508650588
What would that do? It's the top 350 companies in the US, is it not already controlled?

>>508650527 (OP)
Want a real blackpill?

If you genuinely tried to help the middle class raise wages, restore purchasing power, make housing affordable the system would break.
That’s not an exaggeration. That’s structural reality in a fiat debt-based, financialized system.

Why Helping the Middle Class Breaks the System
Let’s say you tried to actually fix things:

1. Make Housing Affordable?
Requires asset deflation
That would collapse mortgage-backed securities, pension funds, and bank collateral
The Fed would panic and inject liquidity to prevent affordability

2. Raise Wages Meaningfully?
Increases consumer demand
Triggers wage-price spiral fears
Forces interest rates up

Debt servicing becomes unpayable across government, corporate, and personal sectors

Credit markets seize recession layoffs

3. Reduce Costs (Healthcare, College)?
Cuts into major profit centers (Big Pharma, insurance, student loan servicers)
These are deeply tied into financial markets and political lobbying
Real cost reform = stock crashes, layoffs, political blowback

4. End QE / Stop Bailing Out Wall Street?
Asset bubbles deflate
“Too big to fail” institutions get exposed
Retirement portfolios collapse
Political suicide

>>508651603
can't say that here or you'll be called a commie
the system is perfect as long as anons think there's even the slimmest possibility that they'll be the ones exploiting people

>>508651712
I'd rather avoid getting into any debate of Commie vs Capitalist vs whatever.

My entire point is to help people understand why things suck so bad and seem to be getting worse.
What this really points to is the reality of a fiat debt based system like ours. I'm not saying one system is better, or not, in fact I don't think any system works when one group gets to take the majority of assets either through force or money printing.

>>508651946
well good luck. You'll be called a commie regardless lol. Nobody here has the capacity to even think about this, let alone debate you on it. The economy is just magic to these people.