Surely that'll mean double murder will not be a thing anymore, right?

>>508677885 (OP)
>If abortion becomes legal in the UK
before starting shitty threads like this . . .perhaps you need to do some homework first?

Bloody mutts and their education.

>>508677885 (OP)
>implying women don't get to have their cake and eat it
A bold assumption in the modern age of gynocracies

>>508677885 (OP)
>If
Fucking idiot.
>is legal killing illegal killing?
Double shit-cunt.

>>508677885 (OP)
It's deeply hypocritical for individuals to passionately protest for abortion rights under the banner of "bodily autonomy," while remaining conspicuously silent—or even complicit—during the era of forced vaccination mandates imposed by many governments. This selective outrage exposes a deeper problem: the illusion of choice in a system that manufactures social conflict to keep the population divided and distracted. The abortion debate, often framed in stark binary terms, serves as a tool of divide-and-conquer—pitched as a moral or political crisis while far more invasive state controls go unchallenged. These “rights” movements are frequently funded or amplified by the same institutions that benefit from the chaos they create, offering people a false dichotomy to rally behind while obscuring the broader issue: an overarching system that selectively grants or revokes freedoms to maintain control. True autonomy isn’t about choosing between two pre-approved sides—it's about recognizing and rejecting the framework that limits the conversation to begin with.

>>508677985
There's nothing extra to know. I'm aware that it's legal if it's up to 5.5 months and it will be extended to 9 months. I just simplified my text, but it was worthless because there's always some double digit IQ guy that will pretend he doesn't know what someone is talking about and I'll have to explain it anyway.

>>508678283
>it is or isn't a human life depending on who kills it
Gynocracy

>>508678461
>there's always some double digit IQ guy that will pretend he doesn't know what someone is talking about and I'll have to explain it anyway.
This happens all the time.

You know the stupid screenshots from British Media that tell you somebody was arrested for 'Looking at a Police dog in a funny way'? . . .. when you actually look behind the clickbait, it's bollocks, they were arrested for something far worse.

I have explained these before but two posts later you get the same low IQ muppets saying 'hurr durr the UK is cucked . . .no freedom of speech' or 'Oi u got a loicence to look at dogs?'

Waste of time.

>>508678350
Thanks chatgpt more people need to realize democracy is just a PR tactic from the government