>CNN is scum, MSDNC is scum, the New York Times is scum. They’re bad people, they’re sick
>What they’ve done is they’ve tried to make this unbelievable victory into something less

https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trump-lashes-out-at-scum-for-revealing-iran-bombing-was-botched/

>>508690221 (OP)
He's right!

What is he going to do? Cry about it?

>>508690221 (OP)
>Trump crying out in pain as he strikes you
Pure cinema. Funny how he’s not calling this one fake news.

>>508690497
The overwhelming majority of the population believes Trump over CNN you little faggot.

>>508690497
Yeah he won't say it's not true, he's just mad the media reported the news

>>508690619

>>508690221 (OP)
It's all so tiresome.

>>508690221 (OP)
This back and forth has been going on for a decade and he’s right. The majority of mainstream news is constantly calling America the bad guys and /pol/ is now siding with (((them)))

He tried blowing up a multi million years old mountain with a few thousand pounds of steel lmao

>>508690925
>constantly calling America the bad guys
No one is saying that.
They're just reported the fact that the bombs didn't hit anything of importance.
What's the alternative? You think they should lie to spare Trump's feelings?

>>508690221 (OP)
when i first read about the assessment i saw nowhere that it's level was "low confidence", that's indeed scum-ish

>>508690619
>Trump still isn’t saying CNN or MSNBC lied
this pseudo-daddy thing you got going on with Trump is fucking weird dude

There's just one simple question. Can american bunker buster penetrate almost 100 meters of rocks plus reinforced walls to reach the target or no.
If answer is yes then media is lying, if answer is no then trump

>>508690619
>the low IQ migger dimwits are in the majority therefore they must be right

Trump cultists are dysgenic freaks

>>508691879
You haven't read what they're reporting

>>508690221 (OP)
He's right.

It's all speculation at this point. All these news outlets had two viable versions of this story on their desk, and of course these arseholes are going to pick the one that makes America look bad.

>>508692957
Either they hit nuclear stuff and we would have seen evidence of it.
Or they didn't..
It's that simple

>>508693420
> Either the mission was a success or it was not

Great insight

>>508693984
>if there was a success there would be evidence of it

>>508693420
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The evidence of radiation or whatever might be hiding under the mountain that collapsed on top of it, eh?

The MSM chose to spin the story this way.

>>508694662
>I don't know anything about radiation
>But let me tell you some cope to defend Trump

>>508694662

>>508694743
I know enough about radiation to know a mountain of rock can block it, retard.

>>508696370
We already know the uranium was moved a head of time, because Trump tipped them off.
There is no radiation because there was nothing there.
Trump is only trying to soothe is wounded feelings

I think it's hilarious how reporters always rustle his jimmies and he crashes out.

>>508690221 (OP)
I agree. Obliteration of the facility was achieved. I did my own Battle Damage Assessment. The program was effectively nullified. However, one more salvo of the remainder of the penetrative bomb units and a generous package of the cruise missile, would send a message that insolence and denials of damage will not be tolerated.

>>508690784
>>508691530
>>508692394
>t. Leftypol trannies still seething and coping about Trump ten years later

>>508690982
They should have used jet fuel then