I posted this in a thread on /k/, might as well post it here
What I think is currently going on with the dems and the courts is they find upholding name based bans on AR-15s untenable but are going to try to hold out as long as possible on the features shit and awbs in general. So, the NJ judge who tried to run out the clock and literally fucking retire in order to avoid giving a ruling gave the weird ruling of
>well you proved ARs are in common use so I am going to strike the part of the name based ban that says colt AR-15s but leave every other part of the ban because you didn't prove AKs are in common use
In the case where they told mexico to eat shit and die Kagan said AR-15s are the most common type of long arm and cited terry gross of NPR, lol, and last year in the bump stock case sotomayor conceded that
>He did so by affixing bump stocks to commonly available, semiautomatic rifles.
in the dissent.
So I think they didn't take that AWB case because the current plan is Roberts was either going to write the opinion himself or he was going to give it to like Kagan and they were going to give a narrow ass opinion that ARs can't be banned by name but mags and features are "accessories" and "accessories" don't get 2a protection.
Like even now cocksuckers on /news/ argue that suppressors are "accessories" even though by US law they are guns and by US law they have been guns since 1968. Under brandon the ATF argued suppressors are accessories and they have only changed that stance recently under trump so the fight isn't going to be
>are suppressors and barrels under 16 inches in common use
the fight is going to be
>are suppressors, mags, barrels and "aw" features arms or are they accessories
>and if they are accessories do they get 2A protection?
and the dems are just going to concede ARs are legal and 2A protected, just like they conceded on handguns more or less what they conceded on "sporting arms" like .22lrs, bolt action rifles and tube fed shotguns.

>>508697700 (OP)
>I posted this in a thread on /k/
Where it was promptly deleted

>>508697883
nah, jannies aren't hanging out in the containment BBB thread. I swear /k/ jannies only janny if you personally piss them off in their own thread or you make a thread

>>508697700 (OP)
>dems are just going to concede ARs are legal and 2A protected
I wish, but they want to get rid of the 2a to make white people easier to genocide.

>>508698558
>I wish,
they already did in NJ and it seems like kagan and sotymayor already did
>but they want to get rid of the 2a to make white people easier to genocide.
that's not litigation though, that's legislation and they are trying to minimize AR legality with mag bans

>>508697700 (OP)
checked,
Anon the FourBoxesDiner (Mark Smith) has a pretty good breakdown of what cases the U.S. Supreme Court is likely to take onto its docket, based on their own schedule, what the lower-court fights and panels are doing (they juggle the cases around to achieve anti-gun goals) etc.

This is a nationwide multibillion $$$$$ campaign of Lawfare, to deliberately deny Americans their natural rights, primarily focused on blue district population weight centers (which heavily tilt several states into the category of blue states, overall due to that single major urban center being blue)
This Lawfare, must be fought down to and at the local level. We can't simply wait around for the U.S. Supreme Court to take up cases and reverse them, in each of these embattled States.
Lawfare isn't just about billions of $$$$$, it's about a *long term* drawn out strategy of delay and denial. They simply do not care how many years, decades it takes for them to achieve Authoritarian Statist goals and overthrow of the second amendment, they will accomplish it with each single inroad and subversion of the courts and state legislatures (ballot measures, unconstitutional anti-2nd Amendment bills passed in state Legislatures).

You need to fight this tooth and nail at the local and state level. Don't wait for NRA-ILA and the U.S. Supreme Court, nationally

>>508699707
I live in jew jerseyistan. there isn't shit you can do because Reynolds v sims made it so cities are the only places that get any representation in state government and cities are full of nonAmericans who want to ban guns

AR-15 is the most common rifle in the US and is very similar to the rifle currently being used by the vast majority of the armed forces. It is the poster child for the 2nd Amendment. If it isn't covered, nothing is.

>>508698193
Wrong, they also janny if you shit on globohomo's armaments.

>>508697700 (OP)
>mags are accessories
I'm sure this is what they're going for, but it's insane and any judge that entertains it should be drawn and quartered. It's equivalent to arguing that a car's gas tank is an accessory.

>>508701046
oh, I don't post in gay ass no gunz threads

>>508700670
hence even the dem judges conceding that states can't ban AR-15s. they will now argue that pistol grips, adjustable stocks, flash hiders and mags are accessories
>>508701047
100%

>>508701231
They've somehow managed to paint themselves into every corner at once. It's almost impressive.

>>508697883
>>508697700 (OP)
Silencers were in common use before illegal and unconstitutional ban

>>508702934
yeah it's why antis are trying to frame them as accessories and not guns
>>508702255
there isn't much else they can do with the way heller made that retarded test to keep machine guns banned. they know they can't just overturn the common use test from the lower courts

>>508703129
At what point do Glock switches count as "in common use"?

>>508697700 (OP)
Gun control isn’t working.

>>508703475
Fuck. Wrong image.

>>508701231
that doesnt work because accessories are not serialized and there a billions of them already in private hands.
i believe the litigation is a red herring to distract from the culture war. they dont need to ban guns if people dont have kids and/or the kids dont like guns. they just need to wait for gun enthusiasts to die

>>508702934
>we aren’t banning cars, we’re just banning tires, mufflers, air filters, and sound deadening
I hate demons so much

>>508703475
>>508703545

>>508703475
did you post an age of consent map?

>>508703190
you would need a very well resourced defendant with very narrow circumstances to make that work.
if he lived in nigger city and there was proof of niggers murdering with autoglocks then he would be justified in owning an autoglock to defend himself.
but everything else has to be clear cut black and white legal. the only crime needs to be possession.

>>508704663
at least theyve stopped trying to use taxes to ban stuff

>>508697700 (OP)
Checked but if you are ever wondering what dems are going to do simply look at California where features are banned, accessories are banned, and most handguns are banned by name. Now they are upset people are building their own guns so SWB-704 will require background checks to purchase barrels. Everything starts in California and spreads to states like yours.

>>508703190
California is solving the Glock switch problem by banning all Glocks with AB 1127.

>>508704533
It's also trivial to make a grip or magazine yourself now.

>>508705399
The first machine gun John Browning made was a converted lever-action.
Banning guns because they CAN be converted into machine guns means banning ALL GUNS.

>>508705811
Checked and yes that is their goal.

>>508703129
Heller was a bullshit copout ruling and scalia was a cuck for keeping the NFA and GCA alive. Read the federalist papers and it's clear that 2a was designed not just to provide for the defense of the states, but to ensure that the people presented a credible threat to a tyrannical government. We need to stop relying on courts and get congress to pass legislation.

>>508706637
scalia was an even bigger cuck for that travesty of a case citizens united

>>508705399
>will require background checks to purchase barrels.
fucking gay for things like shotguns, though based on tfbtv apparently most shotgun sales are meme guns anyway

>>508706637
kennedy and roberts wouldn't rule with him on heller if he didn't cuck the ruling

>>508704686
that map is misleading

may-issue is a cop out for no issue. i knew a friend in CA that donated $13k to a sheriff's election campaign and he had NO problem getting his permit

everyone else can fuck off

>>508707032
Multiple cops have gotten their PP's slapped recently for selling licenses.

>>508700670
Most people don't understand that its just the modern ergonomical rifle design, we don't carry around wooden logs anymore.

>>508707032
once it went from may to shall, so many people got their carry in california

>>508707283
I like pointing out that they are the features that make rifles easier for smaller/weaker individuals (like most women) to use them.

Should all women be beholden to some man for their protection? Doesn't sound very progressive to me.

>>508707136
he wasn't selling, he "legitimately demonstrated need of a concealed carry firearm" (after donating to his campaign) this rot goes on all the time

what DOES go on in California like you said is cops selling off-roster handguns for money. they made this expensive scheme that costs hundreds of thousands to get your handgun certified for sale here, so many mfgs don't bother

cops are exempted (but of course they are), so they buy it, and then sell it for 300% profit to normies

>>508707463
There's also been a number of documented cases of cops selling the guns they confiscated from criminals back onto the black market.

>>508707032
may issue got banned

>>508707461
Also much safer.
Ambi controls, ambi safeties, pistol grips which allow for safer carry, etc..

>>508706920
It's fucking gay for anything to require a background check.

>>508707032
Yep and even then California got mad that some people were carrying so they passed SB2 which made CCW permits invalid almost everywhere. So now even if you pay and go through the months long process to obtain a CCW you can't carry anywhere that is considered a park or into any restaurant that serves alcohol (all of them).

>>508707463
the may issue shit got banned by bruen in 2022. every state is now shall issue, though hawaii might still be retarded

>>508707463
the off roster market for cops is HUGE in california and cops fight to protect their extra income
everyone has to buy their pistols through cops
its a giant fucking police mafia scam

>>508707720
Check this guy out. He absolutely RIPS despite not having hands.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj3J_6Bf0ys

>>508707720
ambi should be banned. lefties shouldn't be allowed to own guns

>>508707830
Bruen did nothing except demonstrate that states can openly defy the SC with impunity and now the court refuses to even hear another 2A case.

>>508708111
~1/3 of the population is left eye dominant.

>>508707745
after they doxxed everyone TWICE that were CCW holders im fuckin glad in didn't pay that scam. i dngaf about their permits, and i will do what i have to. they leakes my friends details twice

they had an investigation into the doxxings and even the fucking investigation final report said it was a bunch of shitty blue hair activists in the government

>a lack of professional rigor
was the cause. they tried to dress it up there too in the report

>>508708150
fuck em

>>508708111
Checked.

>>508708162
Yes they hate the people who try to follow their rules the most.

>>508708353
Here in Canada, the appeals court just ruled that licensed gun owners are "not entitled to procedural fairness". The government can and will violate all the restrictions it wrote for itself into the law and the courts will simply retroactively rubberstamp whatever abuse the government has decided to pile onto them.
We're waiting to find out if the supreme court will take the case.

As far as I'm concerned, if following the law does not protect you from government abuse, then the government is not entitled to collaboration.

>>508701231
>hence even the dem judges conceding that states can't ban AR-15s. they will now argue that pistol grips, adjustable stocks, flash hiders and mags are accessories

This is a crap argument and they will eventually bitch slap it down. The one thing the supreme court doesn't like is court cases which create more litigation endlessly. Seeing as how both gun rights supporters and gun control activists are totally litigious; it is getting out of hand the number and kind of cases. I would imagine they will give a firm SHALL NOT decision that is 9-0 by some miracle to quiet the number of lawsuits down to nothing and bitch slap the worst offenders (New York, California and Massachusetts) for wasting the courts time. If they go down the route you think they are going to, it is going to be endless litigation and the court loathes decisions that are ignored or disregarded which a decision on accessories like that would lead to the worst offenders going right back to total handgun bans and that would mean even more cases arguing the exact same things.

>>508708684
>The Supreme Court will save us!

>>508708641
fuck canada is a shithole

>>508709563
It was actually a nice place in the 1990's.

>>508709400
I addressed this in the OP. either it wasn't a good case or Roberts was going to do the bullshit I said in the OP
>>508708684
I can't think of anything else the antis can stand on other than muh accessories without undoing heller and bruen

>>508709646
in remember a lot of us anglos we like oh what did you do for summer (in the 90s)

i went to Canada it was really nice blah blah.

man you guys got it rough, like punched in the dick by a heavyweight. nobody wants to go there anymore because its not Canada now

>>508709709
>I addressed this in the OP. either it wasn't a good case or Roberts was going to do the bullshit I said in the OP
1. That's cope and it will be interesting to hear what excuse guntubers are going to have when the SC declines to hear Duncan v. Bonta.
2. Roberts is only 70 and he looks healthy which means he could be on the bench for decades more.

>>508710691
>Roberts is only 70 and he looks healthy which means he could be on the bench for decades more.
anyone remember the something awful pusher robot

>i am the pusher robot i push people down the stairs
>i see people they most go down the stairs

gives me an idea for the two diversity idiots that keep writing their 4th grade dissents with box of crayolas

>>508710691
you don't need to wait for roberts to die, you just need a case with a question broad enough that he can't try to jew it

>>508711990
What we need is for the Trump Administration to actually do something about these violations to our civil rights. Remember pic related? What happened with that?

Also why is it the Trump admin has formally asked the SC to take cases several times (which the SC then expedites) but they have never once asked the court to take a 2A case?

Nobody cares about the stupid tax stamps $200 isn't that much these days and plenty of states have straight up banned those things anyways (with many more to follow if it passes).

>>508713011
you are clearly a jew on a vpn

>>508713011
Trump is the one that banned bump stocks. He's not pro-2A.
>Nobody cares about the stupid tax stamps
Fuck that. There shouldn't even be a background check let alone a tax or the extra legal bullshit that goes with it.

>>508714150
>Trump is the one that banned bump stocks. He's not pro-2A.
you are also a jew, pajeet

>>508713613
Because I am advocating for the first supposedly pro-2A administration to actually do something pro-2A?

>>508714150
No boomer is actually pro-2A they can only be motivated to do pro-2A things.

>>508714558
>>508714785
because you are trying to get people to vote for anti gun jews like harris

>>508715264
I post in the hope that some how some day these thoughts make their way to someone influential enough to call out the Trump admin so that they can change for the better. Right now we have not even a tweet from them so of course the infringements will continue as normal.

>>508700070
2nd amendment ends with cold dead hands right?
Give the craziest all the guns they want. They will shoot first and take your guns from you. Gunfights are instant loss games. You have to sleep somwtime.

>>508697700 (OP)
what litigation legal theory are you talking about? sounds like you're focusing on a bunch of minutia when the actual problem is that no small arms should be banned, PERIOD. along with tanks, explosives, etc. you know... anything a well-regulated militia might need in order to fight an oppressive regime. that's the actual legal theory in question (which has been blatantly violated), not how to regulate things you screw onto your small arms.

>>508716221
>>508716982
sure thing kike

>>508717288
I'm describing what the courts are doing, retard

>>508717417
>>508717573
You sound like a teenager that just recently got into firearms and baby's first guntuber channel. You need to realize that while circlejerking in the guntuber echochamber certainly feels good it will never change anything and after years or decades you will get tired of the constant disappointments. Always waiting for the next big game-changing case only to be let down. What we need are new third party influencers.

>>508717288
Based nigga Heil Hitler.

>>508718576
sure thing there, anti gun kike

>>508709400
they keep trying to tell lower courts to stop flooding the courts with the same types of cases.

>>508709709
Muh accessories is a crap argument that will drive even more useless litigation. I can see them trying to claim you need a background check and registration for cleaning supplies and solvents. Will the court step in and decide that those are protected by the second amendment or will they keep letting this spiral forever.

>>508697700 (OP)
associate, hell, chief supreme court justice VanDyke when?

>>508719334
Why are you so against the idea of calling out republicans for doing nothing about 2A infringements? Why don't you want the SC to take a 2A case? Do you realize that after Bruen they are forced to rule in our favor and that is why they are dragging their feet?

>>508719680
>they keep trying to tell lower courts to stop flooding the courts with the same types of cases.
The reason that happens is because the SC refuses to take cases or issue clarifications. They are waiting for public opinion to sway like they did with gay marriage which is why we need normie influencers on our side talking about these clear CIVIL RIGHTS violations.

>>508719334
>t. pic rel

>>508708032
>not having hands.
still has arms, so he is armed

>>508721033
he's a anti-gunner pretending to be the schizo version of what he thinks a pro-gunner is, in order to make the pro @A side seem unhinged/unreasonable.
its classic jewry

>>508721632
*2A

>>508720973
dick vandyke?

>>508721209
>>508721033
sure thing there anti gun jeet

>>508721632
nah, you kikes are trying to demoralize people so you can get jewish dems elected

>>508721632
Perhaps but if that were the case you'd think he'd have more to say, some actual substance. Instead he's already empty which makes me think he's either young and misguided or a cheap bot. The latter is difficult to spot these days they even say nigger and denounce the Talmud.

>>508722081
>weak bait
kill yourself moomer

>>508721933
outing yourself as a anti and a no-guns faggot

>>508722830
hes got seething twitter reply guy written all over him, he's just in disguise.

>>508722830
you are the most jewish jeet nigger in existences
>>508723144
eat shit you anti gun kike. I own guns, you do not

>>508697700 (OP)
those that vote to restrict gun rights are committing a federal crime
rather than trying to defeat them in rigged courts people should be going after the criminals

>>508723395
no, you very obviously dont.
if you did, youd already know vandyke by name, and why he's important to our cause.
youre here to make pro-2a people look bad.
your bait game is atrocious, and youre a coffin-surfing, no-guns moomer troon who has been noticed.

>>508723395
What barrel do you think I should put on this and why?

>>508723745
eat shit, no gunz
>>508724368
idk one of my ARs has a criterion barrel and the other just has the factory barrel also that isnt your gun, faggot

>>508697700 (OP)
it's not just the 2a, but they are being pushed into a corner.

>>508724540
suck my dick moomer.
you didnt answer his question.

also i have an antique navy flare gun that looks oddly similar to that pic rel, minus the gold sight piece. you sure youre not lying to us?

also also, dust your screen ffs.

>>508697700 (OP)
>Category - Shotguns

>>508725024
you wouldnt believe the legal trickery we get up to in this country when it comes to classifying guns as certain things.
pic rel is just a small taste

>>508724963
you have no gunz you Jewish tranny

>>508718576
was never an ACOG fan, i tried it didn't like

1-6x LPVO and red dot w/ 3x mag niggers rise up

>>508723144
>he's got seething twitter reply guy written all over him, he's just in disguise.
Checked but I still think he's a kid. See >>508724540
posting with a shotgun because you only have to be 18 to purchase them. Probably a Maverick 88.

>>508725418
fair enough, will you start behaving so we can talk about this like adults then?

>>508725468
nice airshit

>>508717288
References to muh militia need to be dropped entirely. It's a poison pill meant to make gun rights advocates look like unhinged retards.
> why do you need a tank, anon???
> why do you need recreational ICBMs???
Because I'm an American and I can afford it.
Bottom text.

Fuck the Founding Fathers
Fuck the Second Ammendment
Fuck Public Safety

No access to anything you can purchase should ever be restricted licensing. All people have a natural right to untraceable, mail-order machineguns.

>>508708111
ambi is good for if you get blasted in or somehow break or cripple your rootin tootin shootin hand and gotta switch over

>>508725457
I'll take an ACOG + RMR over an LPVO any day. I do like my EXPS + mag combo though

>>508725611
>herschel is dis reeely free? i neva hoid of such a thing

>>508725752
that fixed 3x bothers me, the one i used was a Burris. usually they are all fixed at 3x

i haven't run it on the assault course to really try it out, but i kinda think i wouldn't like it either way

>>508708111
>https://youtu.be/PGrxHO-B2TY?

>>508725585
There is no airsoft KS7.

>>508725881
Seethe, shill
Never argue within the cages other people build around you.

>>508726123
i think Karl Sternau (bundeswehr zoggie) did a German rendition of the Brit grenadiers song, pretty cool

>>508726124
sure thing there, fagboi

>>508697700 (OP)
t

>>508726124
i have plans to superficially modify a rfb or rdb to make it look like the dmr from the halo games.
its shamefully nerdy, but i will have no regerts.
i just have to move first, i have no garage to work in right now.

>>508725468
>it literally glows
j/k I have no dog in this fight
>>508723745
I can tell you the entire history of anglo-american arms laws, defense laws, and the duty of rebellion from 1215 to the present day and I don't know who vandyke is so please enlighten me
>>508726123
why does this make me want to don woolen socks and stand in a field

>>508727120
Godspeed. I wanted this but now I want a DMR too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JaoL6ijtjo

>>508727262
hes a circuit judge (9th Circ CoA) that recently wrote a great dissent in a case called duncan v. bonta which is a california case that was about their magazine size limits, which is currently 10, for both rifles and pistols.
he went into explicit detail in his dissent talking about why the law is bullshit, its justifications are bullshit, and why it must be purged.
he even posted a really long video with the dissent showing himself handling and disassembling a bunch of pistols, talking about why parts of all of them are banned by california, even though theyre protected under the text of the 2A, and that most common configurations of the pistols include magazines that exceed 10 rounds.
it was a great thing to see, and was a decent crash course for normies to understand the restriction as capricious, and unconstitutional.
i saw his video on youtube.

honestly, he's the best candidate to be put on the SC in the near future.

>>508727508
friend build his own AR10 with Wilson Combat 6.5 sneedmoar upper, things like a laser pointer

i cannot recommend it more. zinging things at and beyond 600 yards like a laser pointer, semi auto too. hit hit hit every time

guys were paying 4x and more for a name brand oem build like that at the range. basically the upper is the entire important bits of the gun.

>>508728625
Thanks but honestly I just wanted to see if he would recognize an AR10. I've heard good things about 6.5 but wanted to stay .308 so as not to have to stock up on a new caliber. Perhaps someone else ITT just starting out (like the anon I was replying to) will go with 6.5 as it does seem to be the future.

>>508698193
/k/ jannies are unironically Israeli loyalist feds

>>508730350
you forgot ethnically jewish in with all that zog faggotry also

and a clearly mentally handicapped terminally stupid mother fucker that used his power.word@employer email address to jannie this place

>>508704663
Also adding a $500/gallon gas tax that takes 6 months to be approved c:

>>508703475
>>508704774

KEK
Destiny had a funny joke once. He said to be a member of the libertarian party you need to get 45/50 right on age of consent laws.

>>508728625
The fitment of the lower and upper still matters for precision shooting. There's slack on my PSA, but that doesn't matter for a 5.56 SHALL rifle.

Reminder that only 1% or so of /pol/ owns guns. The rest are gays, liberals, or live in ban state & foreign countries.

>>508731194
just get an accuwedge.
>>508730350
>>508730786
a bunch of them are yuros or leafs who can't own guns

>>508731194
>There's slack on my PSA
So just shim it or stick an o-ring in there?

>>508731311
>>508731320
I did get an accuwedge. I'm just saying for a long range precision rifle, upper/lower slack is much worse. Correct me if I'm wrong.

>>508701047
You'll get a sane dissent from Thomas and that's it.
>>508728625
I'm holding out for a real fucking NATO Steyr when I get out of California.

>>508731543
>I'm just saying for a long range precision rifle, upper/lower slack is much worse. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Not measurably. Obviously, yes, it's a thing you pay more money for the rifle to avoid, but it's not going to turn a hit into a miss on any decent sized target at any meaningful range. But thankfully, it's also something that if you do have, you can fix with a $0.01 rubber o-ring.

>>508731194
Get an accuwedge

Seriously; why is this allowed? Why are states allowed to violate the 2nd amendment openly and with no consequences?

>Muh Supreme Court!

Takes years to do anything, and has passed on many cases, including several this very term. Why isn't the US Congress passing federal laws protecting the 2nd Amendment while the GOP has control? That's the biggest question here.

>>508732066
>Why are states allowed to violate the 2nd amendment openly and with no consequences?

Because no one is willing to take them to court over it. The Federal government only sues states over things they find it politically expedient or valuable to have adjudicated, and gun laws are not something the Federal government has cared about since basically ever. So the only way anything, be it magazine bans or label bans or pistol brace stuff, or any of that actually makes it to higher courts at all is because a citizen had to break those laws, and then sue the state to prove they're unconstitutional. And doing so requires massive personal and financial risk as it will be years of unimaginably expensive legal battles and personal sacrifice with the very real risk of serving prison time in the interim, at minimum.

So, you want to get a magazine ban removed? Break the law, get arrested, fight it, and keep fighting it until it finally makes it to the Supreme Court.

>>508732066
>Why isn't the US Congress passing federal laws protecting the 2nd Amendment while the GOP has control?
Because guns are a niche issue and no one in Congress is worried about the fallout of not supporting or helping to push 2A legislation. They gain very little in political capital if they do, and they lose nothing if they don't.

>>508697700 (OP)
All what you said IS BEFORE BRUEN!
>BRUEN FROM THE TOP ROPES
>B'AWMYGAWD THOSE RESTRICTIONS HAD A FAMILY!!!

>>508732369
>Because no one is willing to take them to court over it.
More like Jews infested the court systems on purpose and made it too expensive to get the law enforced. The idea a gun with a barrel too short being illegal, is absurd.

>>508732066
roberts is being a faggot and the filibuster. ACB might be being a fag too

>>508732794
I'm not disagreeing with you. But I'm saying that there's no way to get that issue ruled on by a court unless it's the central issue of a court case that is actually being fought and appealed. So if you want it to be adjudicated, you have to make it a thing.

Look man, I want the NFA gone and I want all of the laws on guns repealed (except for blacks and browns, I want them banned from having guns). But saying "Gun laws are cringe lol!" on Twitter ain't really gonna do shit. Someone has to put their body on the line.

>>508732066
Checked and it's because jews own the media and they don't talk about 2A civil rights violations.

>>508732659
Bruen was 3 years ago and still your Hi-Point is illegal to buy in California.

>>508732842
>ACB might be being a fag too
I don't know why anyone thinks ACB is a conservative. She's a liberal through and through, and AWFL in every sense of the word. The only conservative value she identifies with is abortion. For everything else, she's just as much the white liberal parent of adopted brown children as any other Democrat. She hates Trump, she has no love for the 2A or anything traditional, and she's not pro-America.

>>508732794
>>508732369
>>508732066
the jews stall the shit out of lawsuits. Young's case in hawaii took like 20 years to resolve and they ruled against him (and then bruen happened mooting it)
when bruen happened the scotus remanded one of the NJ cases, either the mag or the awb case down back to the previous court and then that court remanded it down again even though they weren't supposed to and then that court asked for discovery on a case they already litigated and then they let the state ask for an extension on the last day twice.

>>508726282
The militia was stated by the founders to be every white man between 18 and 45.

Never allow your enemy to redefine your own terms.

>>508733170
she wrote a pro gun ruling or dissent when on the lower court, that's what everyone is going on

>>508733020
>But saying "Gun laws are cringe lol!" on Twitter ain't really gonna do shit
Depends on who says it. What we need is for a person or group of people to convince the republicans to formally and publicly ask the SC to take 2A cases. This is not unheard of as the republicans already do that all the time and the court DOES abide. If someone Trump likes started going off about this on Twitter he might actually do it. Duncan v. Bonta would be ideal.

>>508732369
>So, you want to get a magazine ban removed? Break the law, get arrested, fight it, and keep fighting it until it finally makes it to the Supreme Court.
To me it sounds like whatever pro-gun actors you have over there should just start sponsoring people to do just this. I know I'd gladly give my time if I was financially compensated. Basically I get paid, you get to use me as a pawn in this legal battle.

Why is it that people are either indifferent about guns or are total fucking autists about guns?

>>508733634
>meme flag
>1 post by this id

>>508733473
>What we need is for a person or group of people to convince the republicans to formally and publicly ask the SC to take 2A cases.

Not going to happen. Most of the more aggressive 2A people in Congress are Freedom Caucus and Trump is getting into fist fights with them. Trump is ambivalent about guns at best and dumb about them at worst. The majority of the Republicans care more about money and influence, and the 2A lobby offers neither.

>>508697700 (OP)
>>are suppressors, mags, barrels and "aw" features arms or are they accessories
>>and if they are accessories do they get 2A protection?
so original intent is just totally out the window huh

>>508733634
Unironically an idpol thing. Some people make being a tranny the focus of their identity, some people make guns the focus of their identity. Many if not most don't really care about either.

>>508733539
>To me it sounds like whatever pro-gun actors you have over there should just start sponsoring people to do just this.
There are organizations and groups that specifically fund the legal cases around these issues and support those that are the defendants in them, but it's still a hard sell just because there's no promise that support will be there and if you're any sort of business or whatever, violating ATF laws is a fast track to losing your business forever, hundreds of thousands in fines, and 15 years in jail.

>>508703190
Caetano
50,000 stun guns is common use

>>508733020
>I need to spend years in jail and spend 7 figures to jews, to maybe get my rights back
Nah

>>508716982
Historically universal armament leads to the crazies shot in the back and removed from the gene pool.

>>508733634
Some people have been in dangerous situations where the police were useless, and others live coddled lives and believe bullshit.

>>508725468
>>508726124
>>508727508
>>508728625
>>508729386
cringe fat people

>>508733808
They ask the Supreme Court to take cases all the time. It's not some big deal that requires millions of dollars changing hands in the shadows. I believe the problem is that the millions of frustrated gun owners across the country are unaware that this path forward is even a possibility because the media has not mentioned even once it for obvious reasons. I believe it is my job to spread this idea in the hopes someone actually important will see it. What is your plan?

>>508731194
Accu wedge.

>>508734214
Whew, the 3D printed ones alone probably outnumber that, let alone the wish.com ones.

>>508731059
who the hell cares?
buy an ad for your name brand internet boyfriend
fucking faggot shit

>>508697700 (OP)

>>508730350

>>508728390
thanks
I will spread the word
I'm tired of presidents outsourcing their SC picks to the federalist society

>>508704663
>of course you can own a 26 gun frigate, sir
>and here's you're letter of marque. welcome to the naval militia!
>WAIT JUST ONE GOT DANG SECOND, ARE THOSE TOPSAILS??

>>508706842
>that travesty of a case citizens united
sorry hillary but you can't ban political speech just because it's critical of you

>>508728390
9th circuit you say
thank you mr. trump
I've been out of the loop too long, that this video exists at all is almost unbelievable

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMC7Ntd4d4c

>>508697883
>Where it was promptly deleted
idiot, it wasn't about ukraine or trannys showing their builds in /arg/ so obviously off topic.

>>508736424

>>508725752
offset red dot blocks your path
quicker transition, maintains your cheek weld and far lower height over bore

>>508697700 (OP)
arguing over bolt on parts is the dumbest fucking thing ever, and i ignore all of it
>SHALL NOT INFRINGE
even if that's not clear enough, we have the disabilities act, sue them into oblivion