are any of the vaxxes safe? i dont trust any of them anymore after covid, i started a new job a few months ago and today i went for the yearly medical check.

doc told me a tetanus shot is mandated at this job, she was getting ready to vaccinate me but i told her i'm not going to take it. she got kinda angry and started ranting about how horrible tetanus is and how easy i can get it, how the vaccine is super safe and 100 years old. i told her i'm just not going to take it and left.

The failure of the red deer to materialize permanently buckbroke the antivax schizos' minds. These people were fully convinced that the vaccines would kill everyone in two weeks and all their problems would go away. They were even fantasizing about how their "pureblood seed" was going to be worth millions of dollars and women would suddenly have a reason to have sex with them (LOL!). As time went on and it became more obvious that nothing was going to happen, these people became increasingly unhinged, eating dangerous agricultural chemicals to treat a virus they didn't even believe existed, just because a scientist told them not to.

Now that it's obvious the end result of the vaccines wasn't a mass die off and the consequent loss of their virginity, but rather an end to the pandemic and their becoming even more socially isolated than before, it has become impossible for them to reconcile what they need to believe with the undeniable reality, and so now, 5 whole years after the pandemic, they are still utterly mind broken and have not progressed mentally since 2020. They continue to go on about how it's only 10 more years, spike proteins this and prions that, obsessively scouring the internet for the latest news of an 87 year old dying to blame on the jab.

Ironically, or perhaps appropriately, the antivaxxers are the only ones still experiencing the effects of the COVID pandemic. Everyone else has moved on. They are completely alone.

>>508703360 (OP)
https://x.com/joshg99/status/1937873469842075942

>>Since our pre-print on fetal loss after COVID vaccination in early pregnancy came out, a number of criticisms have been raised. Although almost all of them are addressed in the paper, I will take this opportunity to respond:

>1. The claim that the analysis doesn’t account for pandemic-related confounders is fundamentally wrong:

>- The robustness analysis shows that the influenza cohorts exhibit the same patterns in 2018-19 and the pandemic years, which is highly suggestive of minimal year-to-year changes.

>- The analysis includes multiple comparative control cohorts from the pandemic period that exhibit very different observed-to-expected patterns than those of the women vaccinated for COVID during weeks 8-13. This strongly suggests lack of consistent confounders that are unique to the pandemic period.

>- The observed-to-expected analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infections during pregnancy shows no signal.

>- The notion that there was something unique about the months when most women received dose 1 and 2 ignores the results for women vaccinated in those same months but in later weeks and also the results for dose 3, which was administered much later.

>2. The claim that the paper does not analyze what types of pregnancy losses account for the higher expected-to-observed numbers is also wrong:

>The paper includes careful analysis that clearly indicates that most of the excess comes from late fetal losses after weeks 20 and 25, which are clearly not elective.

>3. The claim that the paper ignores the possibility of unobserved confounding factors and selectively hypothesizes about a potential healthy vaccinee bias is again wrong:

>- The lower-than-expected fetal losses for influenza vaccinations both in 2018-19 with high rates of influenza and in 2020-21 with next to no influenza is highly suggestive of a healthy vaccinee bias and not a protective effect of vaccination.

>- The higher-than-expected observed fetal losses numbers for COVID vaccination during weeks 8-13 is not likely to be explained by an unhealthy vaccinee bias because of the prompt change from weeks 8-13 to weeks 14-27 that show lower-than-expected observed numbers.

>- The paper does acknowledge the possible existence of unobserved confounding factors. However, it is important to note that those will have to be unique to COVID vaccination during weeks 8-13 and not to influenza vaccination during weeks 8-13 or to COVID or influenza vaccination prior to pregnancy. The fact that there is significant overlap between women who vaccinated for COVID during weeks 8-13 and those who vaccinated for influenza, coupled with our inclusion of a variable controlling for the week in which pregnancies become high risk, makes it more challenging to hypothesize what these unobserved confounding factors might be.

>- As for SARS-CoV-2 infections later in pregnancy possibly explaining the findings: Of the women who vaccinated in weeks 8-13, 87 were subsequently infected during pregnancy with only 3 fetal losses (3.5%, much lower than expected). Of course, if a woman vaccinates during pregnancy but then loses her pregnancy due to infection, it means the vaccine isn’t providing adequate protection, which sort of defeats the purpose.

>4. About unvaccinated women: we looked at them but didn’t report it in the paper. The number of fetal losses is similar to expected, and the curves look a lot like those in Figure 3 for women who vaccinated prior to pregnancy. We will probably include this in future drafts.

>5. People have asked about vaccination before week 8. This is addressed in the paper: we want to avoid biases related to the propensity to report early miscarriage.

>>508704566
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.06.18.25329352v1

the paper itself TL;DR

>Women vaccinated in early pregnancy (weeks 8-13) had a higher-than-expected number of fetal losses:
>Dose 1 = 3.9 more per 100 women
>Dose 3 = 1.9 more per 100 women
>Based on data on >200K pregnancies in Israel

>>508703360 (OP)
Not worth the """affordable housing""" in fact what you've done to america is just as bad as the vax

Falun gong is unironic cancer

>>508703542
The only people who truly care anymore are vaxxies, at this point. I'm just here to laugh at the cattle coping.

>>508703360 (OP)
they are potentially hazardous. also tetanus is a joke I've had countless of rusty cuts 2 decades after my tetanus shot expired and ive never gotten anything. vaccines are a scam.


like 7 years ago i started to become red pilled about the phama industry health scam. most of these fears are truly just cash cows.

There was this at this time crazy guy who said even salmonella isn't actually dangerous. and i'ts present inyour gut anyway. so i did an experiment. I bought 24 eggs from a local guy completely covered in poop and blood. instead of cleaning them i cracked them open in a glass just like that,. so that i would get some kind of contamiation. and yep it worked. I contracted salmonella. guess what the effecs were of drinking 12 raw eggs in a day and contracting salmonella? you think i went into the hospital?

nope not at all. I had light diariehaa ffor a day and that's it. it was over.

also something weird happened. I haven't been sick since that day. which was like 6 or 7 years ago.

vaccines are a scam. don't take them. they only make you and the species weaker.

>>508703360 (OP)
DEATH TO ALL TRUMP VAX TAKERS!!

>>508703360 (OP)
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-vaccines-dont-cause-autism-then