>>508711510You're the retard here. $15 per minute for a video with a 10 minute minimum doesn't mean you just assume that since she's working 8 hours, she can fill all 8 of those hours with non stop filming and selling of back to back to back to back videos. I'll take her "I make $5,000 per hour" number at face value in lieu of a different headcanon number I just made up in my head like you.
>>508711894She says in the article she started gaining intentionally to make the content when she was 275 pounds, so she gained 525 pounds of fat while making the content. While I understand she's just a hedonist degenerate and it was a means to an end, and while I agree she would be a fatass no matter what, I doubt she would be 800 pounds if she wasn't being paid by fetishists who want to see her eat and gain more and more weight.
>>508712175He stated that she's probably making 4 figures per hour on the basis of "trust me bro". He then pivoted to the idea of "that's a lot of money to make for not working very much" and questioned the 8 hours per day working number. The number of hours worked is a meaningless contention anyway. This woman is too fat and undoubtedly way too lazy to be doing anything for income but eating and filming herself, so even if she's making 5k per week working 20 minutes per day it's not like she's using the free time she's saving to run her other businesses. We all know she's sitting on her fat ass eating because she's an immobile blob.