>>508749469>>labor theory of value>this isnt about that dumb shit you fucking nerd. its pretty straightforward.You literally said labor has value. You're a moron.
>if theres tons of diamonds everywhere then theyre not worth as much, even with demand, right?NO, use basic logic, if we have one trillion diamonds, and there is almost no demand, they will be worth almost nothing, if there is a huge demand, the diamonds will still cost a lot, even though there are so many of them, because price is ultimately dependent on demand, you are right that if there is demand, then supply will matter, but supply cannot create demand, because demand is based on value and value is subjective and not based on supply. Therefore, having a supply of labor, no matter how much, is not inherently valuable.
What i am saying is, labor is not value, the value comes first and the labor is a means to an end. In other words, labor is not inherently valuable.
>by your logic, all value is subjectiveNo, i specifically said economic value.
>since it depends upon demand (which as you said, may or may not exist).What? Demand exists if people subjectively value some good, there is no scientific way to determine this and put human beings in some kind of box.
>I find that logic to be pedantic.Find it however you want it's still logic.
>ideology is for midwit pieces of shit like youFair enough kek.