>>508763165 (OP)
voted for it

>article from 8 years ago
Have you been reposting this for 8 years?

>>508763165 (OP)
Based low inhibition ethnic bad boy.

>>508763165 (OP)
Not my fucking problem

>>508763165 (OP)
it goes back to 6000 BC when there was a y chromosome bottleneck. You see, 17 women bred for everyone one man, and there are mass graves found with men, old women and small children in them. Violent men went around the world and killed all the non breeders and then breed the rest. This is a biological fact

Mexicans doing the work, yet again.

>>508763165 (OP)
>being out alone without a male family member is dangerous
The muzzies got that part right

>>508763165 (OP)
I've spent ten mins on tiktok and I now believe 90% of women need a righteous beating at the hands of a man.
I'm just saying it would fix a lot of shit . Old lady taking too long at the store buying scratchers? Beat her down

why do women keep letting abuse chads have access to them?

you can obviously tell which dudes are going to be harmless and simpy. that doesn't give them pussy tingles though

so they go out of their way to get abused lol

>>508763165 (OP)
Sentence him, its a wetback. He probably needs to be on a bus back to Honduras

>>508763514
Spectrum is hereditary but violent is influence. Woman (young one) instinct always right

>>508763165 (OP)
Both genders are bad, but women get away with being evil almost all of the time

>>508763165 (OP)
Men have no idea what being punched is like THEY LIVE LIFE ON EASY MODE (and even steal phrases from smarter people!)

>>508763347

>>508763460
Wife asking stupid questions again while on the phone with her friends...

>>508763623
>but violent is influence
behavior is genetic. people will just repeat patterns their entire life.

>>508763165 (OP)
She said nigger.

>>508763929
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04375-6

>>508764185
Hm
Yes—in simple terms, that’s basically what the study suggests.

Around 5,000–7,000 years ago, many parts of the world saw the rise of patrilineal clans (male-line descent groups). These clans often engaged in violent conflicts, and when one group wiped out another, the defeated men's Y-chromosomes disappeared entirely—because Y-chromosomes are passed only from father to son.

Meanwhile, women were often absorbed into the winning groups through marriage or capture, so mitochondrial DNA (inherited through mothers) stayed more diverse.

So yes:

> A few dominant male lineages “won” through violence or social dominance, and their genes spread while others vanished.
It’s less about individual “violent men” and more about structured, male-led kin groups violently outcompeting others, reshaping the genetic landscape for millennia.

>>508763165 (OP)
Their mothers raised them that way.

>>508763165 (OP)
Looks like the man is very phenotypical.

Women's violence is only kept in check by men. Remove men from a culture and savage women will quickly fill the power vacuum and treat other women far worse than men do.