This is the reason you actually want small government.

>>508787603 (OP)
All sides want this.

OP wrecked.

>>508787603 (OP)
I think you're confusing smaller with condensed

>>508787603 (OP)
I don't want a small government

I just don't want a government that's so big that drags down private sector... which is what makes all the stuff we need, from housing to medical supplies to technology...

if government is so big it devours private sector.... where are they going to get their resources from? ... are they going to tax each other? lol

it's better to tax 10% from $1000 than 50% from $100

tax 10% --> economy grows faster
tax 50% --> economy stagnates or shrinks

idk why communists never figure this out, it's so simple

>>508787603 (OP)

I want no government, asshole Anon

>>508787603 (OP)
>Can't control the money
>Can't control the army
>Can't control the law
Perfect indeed

>>508787693
This. It's not meant as fewer people, but fewer encroachment into public life.
>>508787603 (OP)
Kindly consult the chart.

>>508787603 (OP)
Small government means dictatorship of corporations.

>>508787745
matate indio comunista

>>508787813
If you make under $12500 a year in the United States you pay no federal income tax

>>508787885
Theyre already like that they just have enough people to play pretend while they ruin my country.

>>508787603 (OP)
Smaller government isn't about the number of people, lmao

>>508787603 (OP)
Less shekels spent on lobby. Any other retarded questions?

>>508787951
Tu primero negro desclasado

>>508787603 (OP)
We've established that regardless of size, it invariably goes off the rails. When it does, it would be preferable to only have one motherfucker to behead rather than hundreds, if not thousands.

>>508787603 (OP)
Acktually a leftist cartoon that is kinda funny.

>>508787603 (OP)
Its still centralized. Centralization is the problem

>>508787603 (OP)
>
>>508787890
by fewer encroachment obviously meant less

>>508788051
>flag
checks out

>what I really want

>>508787603 (OP)
Retarded bait thread but long before this no-kings media psyop I naturally came to the conclusion that monarchy would be infinitely preferable to our current setup for an array of reasons, chiefly among them being that:
1. The masses are unbelievably stupid and will always need to be told what to do.
2. The decentralized nature of our "liberal democracy" all but guarantees we can never actually do anything to adequately punish or stomp out the abject evil and blatant hostility towards the populace our "elected officials" display via their nation destroying pocket-lining policies. If a king is being a bastard you can revolt and kill him, but in this system knocking out one termite just makes way for 10 more to crawl out of the woodwork in its stead.
3. Rootless cosmopolitan politicians have no stake in the future of the country they're running! Even if they have kids they have enough fuck-you tier money to live gated, completely separate lives divorced from the consequences of their actions!
And so on and so forth. TLDR people are unironcially too retarded for democracy, dont know what's good for them, and at least you can up and kill a shitty king

>>508787603 (OP)
True. Everyone would be freer. I hate democracy and the antichrist.

>>508787603 (OP)
Yep. The lolbertarian mindset boiled down is "I should be free to do what the fuck I want", which eventually ends up "I should be allowed to tell people what to do and get my way".

What they want is the natural state, where men were free to impose their will to the extent they could. They are fine with sucking up to someone more powerful than they want, the only thing they dont like is playing in a game that has rules thought up and imposed by some goody-two-shoes without the economic power or capacity for violence to back it up

>>508787603 (OP)
>when you say small government you actually mean authoritarian!!!
Shut the fuck up

>>508788190
you dropped these ((( )))

>>508787603 (OP)
That's the exact opposite of small government

>>508787603 (OP)
Do the people still have their guns...?

>>508788221
*more powerful than themselves

>>508788221
another day, another sweden being a faggot.
clockwork

>>508787890
I keep getting stuck in this loop

>>508787890
oy vey but you don't understand, it's complex and multifaceted you see, and subject to the tragedy of the commons oy vey

>>508788221
>I should be free to do what the fuck I want", which eventually ends up "I should be allowed to tell people what to do and get my way".
This does not logically follow

>>508787603 (OP)
This is powerful content.

>>508788304
GOOD

>>508787603 (OP)
This image is retarded and so is the argument that trump is shrinking government because this picture is just the legislature and not the 50,000 armed cops in death squads preventing you from not paying taxes or criticizing israel.

>>508787603 (OP)
>low IQ tard actually thinks "small government" means physical
lol
lmao

>>508787603 (OP)
Why do people pretend Biden didn't do literally this?

>>508787603 (OP)
Less taxes. Better if none. Government should function on a skeleton, and leaders should have all their assets at hand so they lose everything alongside the country they rule

>>508787603 (OP)
this toddler stupidity bait again...

"small" means less state power, limited government intervention

>>508788326
Lolberts have a lot of bullshit like the NAP which they dont actually believe in, and their political allegiances have proven it conclusively at this point. It's like with the commies that used to talk a lot of bullshit about respecting the individual, the worker etc, but sooner or later you have to understand someone by how they act - not by what they say.

Lolberts will support a strongman any given week of the day if he's an old-school natural state strongman grabbing power and bending people to his will, in the school of Genghis Khan. At that point they'll be there sucking his dick for favors.

>>508788492
>>508788462
wouldn't a government with less responsibilities also necessarily be a government made up of fewer people?

and so also necessarily, the power of the entire government is now concentrated into fewer and fewer people. it's a slippery slope and history shows us exactly where it leads.

>>508787603 (OP)
That's not at all what people mean when they say "small government".
The absolute last thing you'd want to shrink for smaller government would be the actual highest level of parliament.
The things people want reduced are the number of faceless buerocrats impeding on their private, personal lives by way of rentseeking, parasitic laws, taxes and practices.
For example, in Germany:
>roughly 5,4 million people work for government in the public service sector
>our current state quota is roughly 50%, aka HALF of all spending is accounted for by the government, instead of private consumers or businesses
"Large goverment" means we are stuck in a quagmire of wasteful, bullshit spending and buerocratic corruption and stagnant paper pushing.

>>508788190
>at least you can up and kill a shitty king
i think i would much prefer just voting differently instead of literally risking my life lol

>>508788674
You're not thinking right. This only happens when you're already a den of corruption, or the public sucks so hard, you need to find ways to privatize the sun if you must. In that context, governments would unvariably be your enemies, not fellow citizens serving you and the community's needs. Few people means less to kill. A bullet puts an end to faggotry. More accountability. You also need to make such decision making power a tale of necessary expenses instead of trying being the shitty impulse force all governments fake to be. If you wear a crown, you're a glorified accountant, not a regal, soft handed, limp wristed, mouth flappening do nothing waste of space, one that's easy to replace

>>508787603 (OP)
Feudal Monarchies are objectively a superior form of government than whatever the entire West is currently doing and this cannot be debated or proven wrong.

>>508787603 (OP)
No, the reason is that 40% of my salary is stolen to finance welfare scammers and Israel bombing children in Gaza.

>>508787603 (OP)
/ck/ is having some picnics.

https://boards.4chan.org/ck/thread/21426868#top

/pol/ is invited. Hopefully you guys bring a bag of chips or a 12 pack of mountain dew. No /k/ brownies please.

>>508787603 (OP)
>smaller govt = less representatives
No it means less bureaucracy
>AKA unelected officials / agencies / laws / taxes / overreach

WHY ARE LEFTISTS SO GODDAMN STUPID

>>508789086
>Few people means less to kill.
so you want to shrink our military forces as well and leave us defenseless to foreign invasion?

>>508787603 (OP)
me as the jester who gets executed for telling the wrong joke

>>508787922
Corporations are just governments with a different name

>>508787603 (OP)
>All sides want this
fuck no cunt!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83qBRmM00R4

>>508789574
Every citizen should be a soldier. All of them packed and ready.

>>508787603 (OP)
A big government produces no real value its just paperwork - it's the same with big corporations they loose their efficiency the bigger they grow and especially unsupervised

>>508788188

Exactly, Anon

Then Co-oping with one's own people while respecting natural borders and individual effort / individual earnings... Good men know right from wrong with common ground

All government "people" "do" is "do law" and "do government" and are hypocritical parasitic scumbags with agendas, always

>>508789777
and who will lead that army?

I was already treaded on so I'm not a yellow flag... For the idiots that don't get it

BDSM games are cool with mutual compatible women that belong to me... I don't want to be controlled by men nor control other men Anons

Governments are gay and hypocritical and parasitic by design

Separations from reptile "fellow whites" and Niggerjews... Problems solved also

>>508787603 (OP)
Why pay millions of useless fucks to make society more shitty when one guy can do it?

>>508790119
Someone, when need arises. If you don't have military formation since childhood you're wasting time, and that needs a martial culture. A martial culture is conditio sine qua non of a healthy society. When need arises, you will have the easiest of times deciding who leads becomes almost irrelevant. Defensive warfare doesn't even need a centralized chain of command to work, and that's on the most exaggerated fantasy where an army wants to deal with a place where even the guy who cuts the hair is lethal. Soldiers are citizens, so they defend their homes. If you want to wage war elsewhere, i don't have the tiniest notion of how can you do that without cucking the entire system to a Caesar

>>508787603 (OP)
You're a slippery slope retard. We're nowhere near the 2nd or 3rd panels in your comic, much less the 4th. Our government is so big that Congress passes bills that its members admit that they didn't read because they're too long. Our government is so big that even they don't know how many laws it has. Our government is so big that billions are spent on wasteful programs that Americans don't even know about and don't want to fund. Our government is comically oversized and when you're this big, wanting to make reasonable cuts is the only thing that makes sense.

>>508787603 (OP)
this is a straw man of what small government people believe though, not that i agree with them since i am a proud statist.

>>508790528
You can't refute this without sounding mad.

>>508787745
The private sector that fucks you every day? Yeah, I also enjoy being poisoned and harmed by fuckers who don't want to be regulated. No love for the govt, but without those checks and balances motherfuckers just do whatever they want and expect you to eat it up.

>>508793290
Or we could just.. not encourage people to fuck shit up for money? Instead of settling for the lesser of two evils?

based

>>508787922
People say this bullshit all the time but it’s nonsense. Large, powerful corporations exist only where there are large, powerful states. The southern hemisphere is full of “libertarian paradises” with weak laws and minimal infrastructure but it’s a corporate ghost town with the largest businesses being clan-owned operations of a few hundred people at most. Big corporations cannot survive without big government, because only a larger government can backstop the risks that accrue as a business grows in size. The bigger a business gets the more it depends on courts to enforce contracts, infrastructure like power/water/roads/ports, and police/military to defend physical assets.
>but we have corporate exploitation of the global south at home
Yeah and all those multinationals are domiciled in the West where there’s enough government for them to exist in the first place and whose governments will bail them out when third world shit happens.
>but the East India company
Was the British government in drag.
>but United Fruit
Was the US government in drag. Smedley Bulter covered this ages ago

This is not “real corporation has never been tried”. Companies didn’t exist for most of human history because we lacked the governmental structures necessary for them and companies only grew in size when the capability/capacity of government met their needs.

>>508787745
Regulations are written in the blood of people they could have saved. While it's all well and good to review industrial regulation we must remember that regulations are often written after people died. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire was caused because the owners chained the doors shut and refused to ventilate the work floor. All in the name of profit. 120 girls died for their greed. Half of them from jumping to their deaths because it was less painful than burning to death.

>>508787979
>If you make under $12500 a year in the United States you pay no federal income tax
True but you still pay state (state dependent) income tax, Medicare, city income tax (city dependent), and OASDI (social security) taxes. You'll get government benefits like SNAP for a couple hundo a month and gov funded Medicaid medical coverage.

>>508787603 (OP)
yeah everyone wants to be the king of their own property and not have leftoids, niggers and statists trying to tell me to get the 14 broken down golf carts off the front of my lawn

>>508794328
OSHA faggots will be hung from lampposts next to the kikes

>>508787603 (OP)
>he thinks being a king/lord is a bad thing
Since when? I'd love to go back to feudal times. My ancestry is full of successful mercenaries who made bank off of their excursions in the feudal world before settling down as farmers.

>>508787603 (OP)
Nah, in the first pic the king is just out of sight as his corrupt lackeys squabble in pretend-democracy.

That's why the swamp is draining and complaining.

>>508787890
Dumb chart. Most important things the government pays for fall under the infinite important but you wouldn't pay for it loop.

>>508787603 (OP)
Liberals are too retarded to understand what a bicameral legislature is let alone what small government or Federalism actually means.

>>508787603 (OP)
Government leeches want big Gov. to steal people's tax dollars.
aka niggers

>>508787603 (OP)
Literally perfect. No more "uhhh duh i dont know who proposed the bill that ruined your life uhh i think it was the guys at the other party"

>>508796839
And the rope will fail because it didn't meet the safety standards of supporting human weight.

>>508788190
Basically. People are fucking cattle. At least a monarch is honest about who is running the show.

>>508787603 (OP)
Unironically, a dictatorship under a single individual who only has the best intentions for the people is the ultimate form of government. The problem is that most men are incapable of maintaining their integrity with that level of power, and usually end up corrupt and selfish, but those few rare leaders of men out there have made the greatest kingdoms and empires under the policy of a single all-powerful leader.

>>508796884
Because Henry VIII, Willhelm II, Nicholas II, Lois XVI, Ivan IV, and Caligula. All kings, all terrible, all impossible to remove before they caused disaster.

>>508787603 (OP)
American isn't my native language, but I'm pretty sure when they say "smaller governement" they don't mean fewer representatives but rather less involvement in the citizens lives

>>508793910
>Big corporations cannot survive without big government
This