>>508790945Hey it's the thing BTC appeals to, neither of us gets to set that level of absurdity.
BTC is funny as a ongoingexperiment but to me it's just like this even less reliable valuta - regular ones have power and institutions behind them, Bitcoin is literally "trust me bro".
It exists by the grace of there being evenless trust in other systems to the point of risking BTC.
Plus the earlier weaknesses i pointed out can still end it even in weakened form - plenty of semi-separated "internets" already exist making it potentially inoperable, as well as decryption risks from quantum computers (or just better regular ones) are a thing.
The point , however, remains unchanged:
Gold has value regardless of anything or any opinion, Bitcoin is the opposite; it exists only so long as infrastructure and opinion actuvely support it doing so.