They're trying to fill the airwaves with debate over whether/how much "Iran's nuclear capabilities" were destroyed by the attack as a trick straight off of a used car lot - "thinking past the sale". The entire conversation presupposes the existence of the thing they really want you to think in the first place - "Iran has/is close to building nukes" - smuggling the conclusion they want everyone to draw into the dialogue as an unexamined assumption while your attention is elsewhere.

Do not participate. The next time some asshole tries to draw you into a debate about the bombing, bring the conversation back to where we were before this psyop started: "They said Iraq had WMD's too, go fuck yourself."

The Iranian government already conceded that they were building nukes, and that those nukes were subsequently destroyed.

I just change the debate by saying that America would get better if the top 20 cities were nuked.

>>508789956
Sauce?

>enriches uranium far beyond what's required
>"nooo we're not trying to make a weapon haha :)"

>>508790370
There is a fatwah against wmd from the Ayatollah, bro. Saddam killed 10k Iranians with his chemical weapons, delivered by Donald Rumsfeld.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei%27s_fatwa_against_nuclear_weapons

>>508789769 (OP)
Good point and well said. Bump.

>>508789956
>>508790370
>Iran says this
>Intel says they have that
We don't care. This isn't a topic with clear facts on the table where the media just does its usual spin nonsense.

The last time these people wanted a war, they flat-out lied right up to the point of perjury and beyond. Iran has been "weeks away" from a nuke since before most posters on /pol/ were born. Go fuck yourselves.