>>508816523>I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case,I'm not a Bible scholar, but it is what the Bible actually say, IIHUC.
When N-Europe was Christianized the theology was that we were Israelis that had forgotten where we came from.
Later during the reformation Hebrew, Israelite and jew became synonyms, and that the old testament is about jews is a fairly modern interpretation.
Jews are not mentioned in the 11 first books of the bible, so Adam, Abraham, Noah etc wasn't jews, as Jews were the sons of Judah.
INRI could is interpreted as Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum but Israelium(?) would work just as well.
>That's why it's just easier to believe in valhalla for meWyrd(fate) is true, even if nothing supernatural exist. Odin could not conquer fate, but he could influence it enough so Ragnarok became a draw and the world could be reborn rather than let the Jotuns(jews) win.
Christ conquered death and offered redemption, so you could argue that our ancestors chose the sweet lie rather than the bitter truth, when they became Christians.
In old Nordic sources it says that Christ created the world, so they really thought that at a point, so I wonder how old the Bible really is.
The Norwegian rune poem for instance say this.
https://youtu.be/64CACoHNBEI?si=NU_C97T0xBXMWb-0&t=120