>Federal Judge found training on copyrighted books by Meta falls under fair use.

And as always, were all living in Amerika, it's wundabah, and soon this cancer will come to Europe.
I for one cope and see the against our new robot overlords.

**What is the woke right?**
The woke right are those individuals who spend all day whining about "woke" stuff, yet they live completely immersed in the *wokesphere* and even get mad defending it:

> They use operating systems made by woke companies
> They use search engines run by woke companies
> They use web browsers developed by woke companies
> They use smartphones with logos from woke companies
> They buy clothes from woke brands
> They use email services from woke corporations
> They drive cars from companies with woke policies
> They even shave with razors made by woke companies

The actual woke crowd loves the woke right — all they do is fund their companies.

They sure will get mad at this post because their mind can't understand you can use alternatives to the wokesphere

Woke right mind doen't understang you can use the internet without giving all your data to apple/google/microsoft

You will see this thread will be filled buy american wokesphere-lovers calling me psyop because they need to defend their iwatch or something lol.

>>508857591
>they have grievances with society yet they participate in society, curious
Shut the fuck up nigger. "Just start your own internet" didn't work back then and it sure as FUCK won't work now

>>508857358 (OP)
They are turning themselves into our new gods and nobody is stopping them.

>>508858306

>>508857358 (OP)
honestly, i'd rather have judicial robots trained in whatever way to enforce morality over niggers and jew judges who are constantly and very blatantly batting for their own racial groups
>but the robot would do that, too
the robot can be criticized and called out for its kikery without having the protective insulation of being whatever miserable, culturally-untouchable brand of black or hebrew that most of ours are now

>Piracy is 100% legal now if you say you're pirating to train an AI

>>508858861
>“This ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta’s use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful,” Chhabria said. “It stands only for the proposition that these plaintiffs made the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record in support of the right one.”

This is a private Zuck law precedent, its not for you.

>>508857358 (OP)
It is and always was transformative fair use.
So is Ai art, music and whatever else.
That doesnt mean all use cases for generative Ai are legal.

>>508860024
>movie piracy is legal, because you transform it from a digital film file to memories in your head

>>508857358 (OP)
You are retarded it literally takes the data and uses to make things. lol

>>508860193
Individual human workers at META literally downloaded books, movies, songs, from torrent trackers, and let the AI model parse them. The robot isn't "reading a book", the programmer is pirating a book and having the robot parse through it. Then the robot, the product of this piracy, is sold for money.

The human is comitting the crime.

>>508860193
Also you are retarded if you don't think this will be used to get AI to learn on your private data on Facebook, for example your private messenger chat, or Instagram chat.

>>508860278
Yea but that's a completely different thing than fair use. And a lot harder to prove

>>508857358 (OP)
So I can pirate movies too as long as I'm training myself?

>>508860056
The illegal part is copying the video without permission. AI training doesn't copy the source data it just reads it>>508860278

>>508857591
Imagine telling people from 10 years ago that people would go to forums just to post generated ai slop content

>>508858306
They are killing all creativity. There is no incentive to create if they can just steal it and commercialize it.

>>508857358 (OP)
They're trying to feed a demon, most likely the anti christ. We're in the final stages sadly.