Anonymous
ID: cxK5LPGG
6/27/2025, 3:43:12 PM No.508871487
I found this just a few minutes ago, and thought I'd share, but leave it to you to figure out which country they were talking about (not Iran). I'll provide the country downthread.
>>From the first days of the war, XXX commanders pointed to the alleged disloyalty of XXX’s Jewish population, its direct complicity with the enemy, and its involvement in espionage. Utilizing the broad authority entrusted to military authorities by wartime acts, the army began to solve the “problem” of Jewish disloyalty. In this “struggle” the army expelled Jews from various localities, took hostages, and restricted the movement of Jews near the front line. The General Headquarters (XXX) officially adopted these measures in a published statement in January XXXX that set forth the charges against the Jews. No distinction was made between Jews who were XX citizens and Jews in occupied XXX. The proposed measures were either supposed to ensure the Jews’ loyalty by instilling fear of expulsion or execution, or to eliminate the Jews’
>>From the first days of the war, XXX commanders pointed to the alleged disloyalty of XXX’s Jewish population, its direct complicity with the enemy, and its involvement in espionage. Utilizing the broad authority entrusted to military authorities by wartime acts, the army began to solve the “problem” of Jewish disloyalty. In this “struggle” the army expelled Jews from various localities, took hostages, and restricted the movement of Jews near the front line. The General Headquarters (XXX) officially adopted these measures in a published statement in January XXXX that set forth the charges against the Jews. No distinction was made between Jews who were XX citizens and Jews in occupied XXX. The proposed measures were either supposed to ensure the Jews’ loyalty by instilling fear of expulsion or execution, or to eliminate the Jews’
Replies:
