>>508888644That's casualties, the strategic calculus more or less remained the same.
Iran still has enrichment capability, missile cities underground, people rallying around the flag and the regime is completely vindicated.
Israel still can't achieve their strategic goals alone, they need the US and the US still desires a deal and a way to keep tabs on the nuclear program, this attack on Iran is extremely unpopular.
Any serious war will be too costly and Iran can stretch it out painfully long, they've got the manpower and material for it and have already shown the capability to retaliate and survive.
It's sort of like Russia vs. Ukraine, Ukraine in some aspects punches above its weight but it's dependent on Western support and has a relatively smaller population than Russia.
Israel is the same, just far more prepared, even smaller and more advanced but it requires expensive Western support.
Constant refueling done by both the US and Germany, anti-air by the UK and the French and that's not even to mention how expensive the upkeep of the Iron Dome, David Sling and Arrow 2 and 3 is.
Every hit Israel takes is more devastating than what it dishes out to the Iranians. In pure attrition, they're entirely dependent on Western support, which would falter as theaters like China and Russia gain more importance.