>>508889360 (OP)I heard someone anonymously online that they were reading news articles from experts that said maybe the US should do regime change in countries that are turning Muslim yet also already have nuclear weapons since those are massive global security risks. Because in 20 more years those countries in Europe will form their own Muslim block and most of NATO's biggest countries will be Muslim with Nukes.
Now would be the time to do it, he said, because these countries undergoing Muslim demographic replacement would be divided on the issue and thus would ineffectively be able to resist the restoration of democracy.
I thought that guy conveyed what the experts were saying pretty well, but I really am not sure about the whole thing.
That person also read an article in the New York Times that said the USA needs to do regime change in Canada. IDK personally, but from what he said the article had interesting points because they mentioned Canada is increasingly hostile and has a growing population of people that hate the USA, similar to Iraq. Also similar to Iraq, the government is against wildly popular policies that the people want implemented.
The guy I heard this from said the NYTs mentioned that they don't have true democracy (like Iraq and Iran) because they don't do the will of the people to limit immigrants to their already crowded and expensive towns.
Interesting, but IDK still.
Some other guy said CNN had an expert that spoke about regime change in the UK as well and I was shocked too because the expert said the UK is a situation similar to Iraq and Iran as well. They also don't have democracy and allow their population to get raped and do nothing about it. That guy said a lot of stuff, but I still don't know.
Interesting tho, because the USA always is doing regime change to Middle East countries to make them better.