https://archive.is/52l5W
Contrary to what many jews will say in this thread there is NO RULING from SCOTUS that states that the children of illegal aliens are citizens, that is NOT what the 14th amendment says either and it is NOT what the author of Clause 1 of the 14th amendment says in constitutional record, and it is NOT what SCOTUS precedent says in Wong Kim Ark.
>Here is how it stands today:
1: Constitution says that children of illegals do NOT have citizenship.
2: Precedent set by SCOTUS in Wong Kim Ark states that children of LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS have citizenship.
3: The author of 14th Amendment Clause 1 Senator Jacob Howard, specifically excludes the children of illegal aliens from birthright citizenship when he offers his definition of the words "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof"
4: On June 27th, 2025 SCOTUS ruled that the National Injunctions that were placed against Trumps Executive Order were unlawful and thus the Trump Administration was granted the ability in multiple states to enforce his Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship.
>Trumps Executive Order is as follows:
“policy of the United States” to no longer ISSUE or ACCEPT documentation of citizenship in two scenarios: “(1) when [a] person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when [a] person’s mother’s presence in the United States was lawful but temporary, and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.”
THEREFORE a ruling is required by SCOTUS NOW to clarify if the children of illegal aliens are covered under the 14th amendment and given all of the historical context and precedent set by previous SCOTUS majority opinions... the answer is CRYSTAL CLEAR that they are NOT protected under the 14th Amendment.
>As it stands right now:
a child born of illegal migrant parents could be denied Documentation and Citizenship status in Ohio but if that same child were to be born in California that child would be granted citizenship - This disjointed chaos will force SCOTUS to make a ruling on the constitutionality of the 14th Amendment as it pertains to the Children of Illegal Migrants within the year and in the meantime the Trump Administration gets to enforce their Executive Order in any state that doesn't fight them on it such as Texas or Ohio, etc.
>How it should be and likely WILL be interpreted by SCOTUS:
The jurisdiction clause, as originally understood, grants birthright citizenship only to children whose parents have full, exclusive allegiance to the United States. The Constitutional text in history shows that children of illegal aliens and illegal aliens who are in the United States temporarily are not citizens by birthright under
the 14th Amendment.
The drafters of the 14th Amendment understood not to grant citizenship to persons, quote, ‘‘owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty.’’ In the first cases decided after ratification, the Supreme Court held that ‘‘jurisdiction’’ in the 14th Amendment means not nearly subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States but completely-but completely-subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.
Of course, illegal aliens and legal temporary United States residents do not owe complete, direct, and immediate allegiance to the United States. Therefore, their children are not citizens by birthright under the 14th Amendment.
Tomorrow it'll be back to "federal court halts Trump order."
The next day, "Trump order a go."
etc. ad nauseum
>>508909532There are no more courts to appeal to, there is no higher court than SCOTUS - The individual cases in the states will still proceed and the statewide injunctions will continue. This will create a disjointed court system where children born to illegals in Boston are handed documentation and proof of citizenship and then the family moves to Texas and the child's documents will be refused because under their state they are following the Executive Order from POTUS this will accelerate the process in which SCOTUS has to make a ruling on the 14th Amendment which is a good thing because they have been punting it for 130+ years!
Reminder of previous rulings:
Sure—here’s the same text split into separate entries for clarity, still under 1000 characters in total:
---
United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898):
A child born in the U.S. is a citizen, even if parents are not citizens.
"Every person born in the United States…becomes at once a citizen."
---
Plyler v. Doe (1982):
Undocumented immigrants are still subject to U.S. jurisdiction.
"No plausible distinction…can be drawn."
---
INS v. Rios-Pineda (1985):
"There is no question that the child, born in the United States, is a citizen."
---
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004):
"The Fourteenth Amendment draws a clear line: persons born in the United States…are citizens."
---
Sessions v. Morales-Santana (2017):
"The Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause…declaring that all persons born…are citizens."
---
Courts have consistently affirmed birthright citizenship with only narrow exceptions like children of diplomats or enemy occupiers.
‐---------
Good luck at congress, Chuds.
>>508910120>AI generated slopat least write your own posts, shill.
>>508909532>federal court halts Trump orderYou retard, the Supreme Court mogs every other "judge" in the U.S.
>>508910120The only one of those that touches on Birthright Citizenship under Clause 1 of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution is Wong Kim.
Stop using AI to think for you, fucking dipshit.
>>508910577It also fucks with Voter Rolls in like half the country.
>SCOTUS punted birthright citizenship issue
NOTHING EVER HAPPENS
>>508910392They are all jurisprudence. You should use AI or something bro, your head isn't cutting it.
Doesn't affected birthright citizenship. Only injunctions.
Supreme court has effectively turned the US into 94 states via federal districts.
You have to get an injunction in each district now instead of nationwide.
Injunctions against Biden shit that were previously nation wide are now limited to a specific federal district
Shitskin
md5: 9923069b7ecde9067fe2938f93f2a980
🔍
>>508910577Thank God. I'm tired of looking at shitskins pretending to be American to exploit what's left of this country
If OP could read and comprehend past a 5th grade level they would understand what
>grants Trump’s request to narrow injunctions
doesn't mean
>children of illegals do NOT have citizenship.
Nothing ever happens and IN FACT. Trump just made it 100 TIMES HARDER for something to happen
>>508910250They'll just nullify by refusing to enforce the law. What are the Feds going to do, arrest judges?
Democrats will reverse this when George W trump starts a war in iran and loses the election in 2028
>>508910250Go ahead & lock 'em up. How many locked up so far? Oh, that's right, none.
Latinx BTFO, legals are next but first we need to invade Mexico so that the fifth column already inside the USA chimp out and carry out terror attacks for Mexico, then everyone will be against all Latinx.
>>508909532They can't do nationwide injunctions anymore. The Supreme Court is the final say
>>508911088>>508911581Kids born in fornia and york will get the passport every time.
>>508909532they ended that too in a separate ruling
also they defunded planned parenthood and are sending the cat eaters back to haiti, all these decisions came down just today lol
you're fucked right through
So blue states will continue to issue state injunctions against this. This will cause them to get flooded with even more illegals in the US since red states won’t protect them. Let’s see how niggere chimp out when their shithole cities are even more over ran by spics
>>508911309yep
already did, did you forget? you nitwit
>>508912247not really, they have to actually sue or appeal directly to the supreme court, after a normal process
it's over, you lost
>>508911309>What are the Feds going to do, arrest judges?Correct. Judges can absolutely be arrested for obstruction of justice. They do not have special immunity to prosecution.
>>508912527You may want to look up what "binding precedent" means.
>>508910354That’s antisemitism and protected under the law.
I dont get the autism of common law. Why you niggers praise your shitty original constitution as a holy document and then let a bunch of boomers making meme hypotheticals questions interpret the document as autistically possible instead of doing real legislation? I mean in the end the autistic legal rambling is ignored by everyone and you just start shouting at each other over political drivel.
>>508910120Whoops, looks like those rulings are going away
>>508909169 (OP)>SCOTUS ALLOWSThose retards don't allow shit, a fucking grand jury of citizens out ranks those morons.
>>508910626Would be fucking hilarious if half of these sanctuary states implode because their framework of anchor babies become fractured due to retroactive ruling. That would be such a massive happening that part of me believes we will be massively disappointed in a future ruling
>>508915329Trump is not gonna stop on this. This issue literally saved his life. He was rough his first term, but he played gentle. The gloves are off now and the other guy is being battered. Completely
>>508910120Yes and illegals are enemy occupiers and will be declared as such. A foreigner who breaks us law and does not turn themselves in is an enemy of the state if they reside in the nations border
