>Palantir le bad
>Big Tech le bad
>NSA le bad
>Privacy le good
Is there an actual good argument for this other than you have a lot of CP saved on your PC?

>>508917660 (OP)
>if you're not doing anything wrong you have nothing to hide

>>508917660 (OP)
you're a concern trolling troon shill that's scared of the cia's info becoming government property.

If privacy doesn't matter tell me your full name and workplace so I can inform them you use /pol/

shut up commie

>>508917660 (OP)
No because they're all using the same technology so the whole thing has been incredibly dishonest and a giant waste of time

>>508917660 (OP)

Because bad is a subjective term defined by those in power and can easily be changed to mean anything. For example, they could decide calling you a fucking faggot is a problem, and then where would I be?

>>508917660 (OP)
1 post by this id

Privacy is the right to be left alone. The basis of freedom.
Not being harassed by governments, businesses or criminals or anyone if they have no business with you.

>>508917660 (OP)
kinda my thinking about the situation
I obviously know I am on the truman show so I try real hard to align my every action to public consumption.

>>508917660 (OP)
Ain't nothing like a piece of pussy except maybe the Indy 500.

>1PBTID
All fields faggots.

>>508917660 (OP)

>>508917660 (OP)
>blanket warrants for me, not for thee
How about an organization of people in the bottom half of society is granted monitoring rights for the top 15% and every government official, to include all electronic communication and financial actions, and get funded by Congress? This seems fair.