Thread 508969855 - /pol/ [Archived: 729 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: bysIzF5DUnited States
6/28/2025, 7:21:20 PM No.508969855
1751052877531305
1751052877531305
md5: 7b68d5dfd82821e36cebdfda782e0f11🔍
I really want to know what was the real archeological history was with these Israelites and were they actually what the bible claims they were?

I've researched this much on the subject and I found out the following
>Absolutely zero evidence of anything happening the book of Exodus in real life, no evidence of the patriarchs such as Abraham and Isaac and Jacob.
>No evidence that the Israelites were ever in Egypt, let alone enslaved
>No evidence of the conquest of Canaan by Joshua
>Jerusalem by the iron age was only a tiny hill country town and never a capital
>Earliest mentioning of the Israelites as a people or nation was on some Egyptian stone marble in the late 13th century bc, nothing discovered prior to that date
>God was originally Yahweh and then in before was a god named El and was part of a pagan cult of the Canaanite pantheon
>Israelite kingdom only showed up in the 10th or 9th century bc
>Regularly practiced Yahwehism where God had a consort named asherah
>Only started actually being monotheistic after returning from exile in Babylon and establishing a second temple

Does this mean that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are worshipping a god that has its roots in typical Canaanite polytheism? And therefore false if you were to guess?
Replies: >>508971851 >>508972281 >>508972635 >>508974502 >>508975807
Anonymous ID: 8TGcfOaxUnited States
6/28/2025, 7:48:55 PM No.508971851
>>508969855 (OP)
israelites were canaanite people
the bible is fiction
they wrote the torah in jerusalem right before babylonian conquest
they were never in egypt, they fabricated all their folklore and revenge fantasy and built their myth and stories by borrowing from surrounding people
Replies: >>508975084
Anonymous ID: XxuJjRcKUnited States
6/28/2025, 7:55:25 PM No.508972281
p007_0_02_1
p007_0_02_1
md5: 8e883af20bd00ee4724b62fa0966e6d5🔍
>>508969855 (OP)
>I really want to know what was the real archeological history was with these Israelites and were they actually what the bible claims they were?
They were mushroom eaters. What the Egyptains called Aten, or the sun
Jesus was a mushroom--
Figure it out
Anonymous ID: edpTKTarUnited States
6/28/2025, 8:00:39 PM No.508972635
>>508969855 (OP)
yeah man.
I'm was about to call you a faggot...but everyone has to start somehwere. OBVIOUSLY the Abrahamic god is a made up basterd bitch or other lower entity if it demands child sacrifice, the martyrdom theme of christianity was to create slaves who would sacrifice themselves, like you see White people doing right now, the Muslims were created as lambs to the slaughter as well, the Jews hold the mysticism and run shit on some level but htey have plebs too and their god is the demiurge....runs the material flesh plain no getting around it.
I reccommend watching youtube videos of
Dr. Amon Hillman who translates ancient Greek and says ALL of it comes from Greek source anywway, even the Hebrew is pre-dated by the Greek...it's all fake and gay to run society in a monolithic type way to keep the slaves as slaves(decentralization is the only way out). Also watch timeline hunter on youtube as well.
Anonymous ID: pMlDG9DdNetherlands
6/28/2025, 8:26:26 PM No.508974502
>>508969855 (OP)
Most Christians don't even recognize the obvious inconsistencies and contradictions within the Bible itself, let alone the contradictions between their stories and archaeological evidence.
Anonymous ID: QKCNEXomUnited States
6/28/2025, 8:34:39 PM No.508975084
>>508971851
Everything in the OT is just We Wuz Kangz fanfic based on the myths and histories of the real civilizations around them. The Kingdom of David never existed. That area was controlled by the Egyptians and Assyrians. The description of the temple in Jerusalem is actually the Temple of Marduk in Babylon.
None of it is real.
Anonymous ID: km2J6JN0United Arab Emirates
6/28/2025, 8:45:18 PM No.508975807
>>508969855 (OP)
yes the bible contradicts history. what you're talking about was mainstream and well known for decades among archeologist and published peer reviewed academics. however it wasn't well known amongst every to day people. And this probably still the case to this day. Most people probably don't know that the bible's account of history contradicts the material evidence of those bygone eras. even in countries where belief in the bible is declining. And the people who stop beliving in the bible probably do so for reasons other than it's contradiction to history. I mean most people think biblical writings are bronze age and iron age writings. When the bulk of the bible is most likely from the Hellenistic period. not even from the Persian period.

>be archaeologist
>dig around Sinai for decades
>find literally zero evidence of millions of Israelites wandering for 40 years
>Exodus not even once
>read about Jericho walls falling from trumpet blast
>actually check Jericho
>city was already destroyed centuries before Joshua would’ve arrived
>bible cope intensifies
>open Bible
>David and Solomon had giga-kingdom with gold, palaces, empire vibes
>check archaeological record
>barely find a few huts and broken pottery
>“unified monarchy” my ass
>see Philistines mentioned in Abraham’s time
>they didn’t even exist yet
>bible.exe has stopped working
>global flood with Noah and zoo boat
>geology and archaeology: “nah bro, never happened”
>no flood layers, no mass extinction, no ark debris
>boat story just vibes
>look up ancient records from Egypt, Assyria, Babylon
>expect epic Bible battles and plagues
>records: “who?”
>Bible getting ghosted by history
>dig in Canaan
>expect foreign Israelite invaders
>instead find Canaanites slowly evolving into Israelites
>“conquest of Canaan” was just a rebrand
>analyze Hebrew texts
>turns out most were written centuries after events they describe
>tfw your holy book is historical fanfic