Why don't rival governments simply kill their opponents?
>they do, retard
Not as often as you'd think, tho. Think about it. They could do it way more.

>>509019656 (OP)
Because they do.

rip my nigga jack

They would have to have a fifth column and be solidly entrenched in the government like in the case of JFK.

>>509019656 (OP)
Turns out it's easier to just rig the elections so you never have any opponents.

>>509019656 (OP)
you mean assassinate, right?
It sets a bad precedent that would make leaders have to hide in bunkers all day. Also it infuriates the populace of the attacked country.
Only Israel does that shit, and they brag about it

>>509019956
Just like when America drone attacked that irainian general?

>>509019656 (OP)
The Geneva convention must be changed:
In times of severe conflict, governments must assassinate each other three times and be replaced in elections. Only if the conflict is still there after that, they are allowed to start a war. This guarantees eternal peace, because the politicians are first in line, instead of reveling in luxury while young men are send to slaughter.

>>509019656 (OP)
Hmm...

The results from assassinations in America are the worst presidents Wilson and LBJ.

>>509019656 (OP)
Because wars are fake.