Anonymous
ID: QMBPjg5K
6/29/2025, 6:07:49 PM No.509045291
Is the user with ID 9GC1H83Q, who participated in the craniometry discussion in thread >>508898879 , still here?
You only posted a few skull images without citing a single credible academic paper or source to support your claims.
When I presented craniometric data that contradicted your claims, you just dismissed it without evidence, calling it 'dirty chinks lie and cheat' — and that was it.
Now that the thread has been archived and replies are no longer possible, I couldn’t just let it go — it’s just not in my nature. So I’m posting this follow-up.
If you’re reading this, please provide a proper source to support your claims. If not, then you’re no different from the gooklandians and dirty chinks you referred to as having low IQs.
Plus, since I haven't been active here before, this post might not be a good fit for me. I apologize for that.
You only posted a few skull images without citing a single credible academic paper or source to support your claims.
When I presented craniometric data that contradicted your claims, you just dismissed it without evidence, calling it 'dirty chinks lie and cheat' — and that was it.
Now that the thread has been archived and replies are no longer possible, I couldn’t just let it go — it’s just not in my nature. So I’m posting this follow-up.
If you’re reading this, please provide a proper source to support your claims. If not, then you’re no different from the gooklandians and dirty chinks you referred to as having low IQs.
Plus, since I haven't been active here before, this post might not be a good fit for me. I apologize for that.
Replies:
