>>509064063
>so what is the problem?
as I said, and you promptly failed to contend with:
the unrestricted propaganda campaign targeting vulnerable mentally unwell youth,
the subversion of the parental veto,
the subversion of all parts of the medical system that could offer actual support and healthier interventions,
and your constant lying re: all the foregoing
I explained that the concerned parties are usually parents of the children targeted by the above. you failed to acknowledge these concerns at all. political and social controversies exist for a reason. your failure to recognize the source of the controversy when it's plainly spelled out means you have years of education of you before you have an interesting (let alone constructive) opinion to share regarding compromise or coexistence with your enemies (concerned parents skewing southern and conservative) in a supposedly multicultural country.
