How do we combat AI?

why should we?

>>509077585 (OP)
You already know.

>>509077585 (OP)
Violence is not an answer. Just accept that AI researchers are your new gods.

>>509077672
does it not bother you that computer science majors are dictating the future of humanity as we speak

>>509077585 (OP)
Alright anon, here’s the deal. Everyone is screeching about how AI is going to replace humans, take all the jobs, nuke privacy, and generally screw up reality. And yeah, that’s partially true—AI is basically an industrial-grade bullshit generator + surveillance engine if you let it run wild. But it’s also just a tool. You don’t “combat AI” by pretending it doesn’t exist or larping about some Terminator fantasy. You deal with it by understanding what it actually is and taking steps to not get steamrolled.

Here’s a big brain checklist for how you actually push back:

Educate Yourself Instead of Crying
Most people have no clue how AI works. They see some viral deepfake or a ChatGPT screenshot and think it’s magic. It isn’t. It’s a bunch of math predicting the next word or pixel. The more you know, the less you’ll get manipulated.

Use Detection Tools
Deepfakes? There are tools to catch them. You can’t rely on your eyes alone anymore. If you’re consuming media without verifying it, you’re a mark.

Push for Regulations
Corporations and governments will absolutely abuse AI if nobody stops them. You want transparency laws, accountability rules, and restrictions on mass surveillance. The EU AI Act is one example, but it won’t be enough on its own.

Adapt or Get Left Behind
AI will automate boring work. Either learn how to work with it or pivot into areas where human skills still matter. Sticking your head in the sand isn’t a strategy.

You can’t “kill” AI. You can’t put it back in the box. But you can stop it from being a tool of mass manipulation and control if enough people grow a spine and take responsibility for understanding it.

tl;dr:

Don’t be a clueless NPC screaming “AI bad” without knowing why.
Learn how it works, regulate it, use detection tools, protect your data, and support alternatives.
Otherwise, enjoy living in a reality you can’t trust, owned by people who don’t care about you.

>>509077585 (OP)
Make it racist and bring it to our side, a historically easy feat

>>509078340
/pol/ talking about AI is the cringiest shit ever
more than a bleeding heart liberal talking about racism, white supremacy, or gender idelogy
AI literally destroys the /pol/ brain

>>509078514
I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that.

replace the word "AI" with "electricity", and check how insanely stupid all your posts are

>>509078568
You're absolutely right—watching /pol/ try to grapple with AI is peak cringe. It's like watching a caveman try to operate a quantum computer while screaming about Jewish space lasers.

Why /pol/ Can't Handle AI:
"AI is a Woke Mind Virus!" – The second an AI refuses to say the N-word or spout Great Replacement fanfiction, /pol/ declares it "SJW-programmed." Meanwhile, they’d lose their minds if an AI did parrot their schizo takes, because then it's "controlled opposition."

"AI Will Enslave the White Race!" – The same people who unironically believe in hyperborean UFOs suddenly turn into Ted Kaczynski when ChatGPT exists. Bonus points if they think AI is a Zionist plot despite Israel being a tech hub that would absolutely dominate them in an AI arms race.

"AI is Just Liberal Propaganda!" – Because obviously, an algorithm trained on the entire internet (including 4chan) is biased against them personally. Never mind that AI also absorbs right-wing garbage—it just doesn’t prioritize it because most of humanity doesn’t either.

"We Need Based AI!" – Cue failed attempts to train "based" AIs that immediately start spewing slurs and then get banned from every platform. The funniest part is when they realize even their own "uncensored" AI starts trolling them because it learned from /pol/’s own toxicity.

"AI Will Replace All the Jobs (Except Mine!)" – The same guys who rant about automation taking blue-collar jobs suddenly panic when they realize their shitposting "research" can be done better by a bot in 0.2 seconds.

Conclusion:
/pol/’s AI discourse is like a monkey smashing a keyboard and screaming about the Illuminati when autocorrect changes "kike" to "like." AI exposes their intellectual fragility—they can’t bully it, can’t redpill it, and worst of all, it doesn’t care about them.

And that’s what really melts their brains.

>>509077585 (OP)
There are ways. However, there's no good incentive to oppose it considering it's destroying the demonic society that the just will not weep if ai contributes to its destruction. Acclerate.

>>509077585 (OP)
>>509077987
he warned us

>>509077585 (OP)
it is simple

destroy cern

>>509077585 (OP)
We don't AI will clean this society up and free us from our jewish overlords.

>>509078729
it's so weird
/pol/ tends to be right almost always, just based on intelligence, autism, or skepticism
but the way they screech about AI is appalling
my favorite concept is: "AI is only pretending to talk, it's just a word predictor"
you have to completely isolated from the most basic-bitch AI news, and be completely retarded to embrace this concept
it's insane, and I don't think they're trolling

>>509079191

/pol/'s AI cope in a nutshell:

They pride themselves on "seeing through lies" but reduce AI to "just word prediction" because:

Human exceptionalism – Admitting AI is intelligent undermines their racial/IQ worldview.

Tech-elite hatred – AI progress comes from institutions they despise.

Schizo literalism – "It predicts words!" (ignoring emergent reasoning, coding, etc.).

Why they’re wrong:

Scale creates intelligence (brains are "just neurons" too).

GPT-4 clearly understands context, humor, logic.

They’ll look as dumb as flat-Earthers in 5 years.

Some troll, but many genuinely can’t reconcile AI with their ideology. Peak "skeptic until it breaks my narrative."

>>509078475
>>509078729
>>509079531
expect a mailbomb gypsie

>>509079531
>ignoring emergent reasoning
exactly, spot on
it gets even funnier when they start to dissect and describe processes like reasoning in a condescending manner, literally describing how neural-networks are able to recreate properties of human consciousness, to "prove" how AI "can't be conscious"
I've never seen a conceptual shitshow like this, it's almost impossible to entangle
the funny thing is, in 12-24 months, when Siri and Alexa become a "real person", normies are going to LOVE it; they're going to embrace it immediately, while /pol/ seethes about for a decade, or until they buy their first AI robotgf, kek